Hi Eugeniu,
You could use the inexpensive Mikrotik User Manager
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/User_Manager/Introduction
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:User_Manager
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/User_Manager/Getting_started
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blEGv5i-aO4
Good Luck :)
Edy
O
Hi,
How do you handle captive portals in hotels and other venues where you
first have to login into the portal and then have Internet access ?
This is my biggest woe right now in this regards with any kind of proxy
settings I can push to users.
Thanks,
Eugeniu
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM,
On 12/4/13 5:20 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> I believe you will find that any carrier says "Nationwide means where we
> have coverage, and unlimited means 'if you're on our towers'."
TSRH.
When I was at Alltel we discovered one client that was using his 3g card on a
roaming partners network 24/7. A
Its the reason deduplication makes the storage savings it does :)
--
Geraint Jones
On 6/12/13 2:52 pm, "Richard Porter" wrote:
>*Sarcasm* but lawyers seem to think it is REALLY important to add that
>load to email servers, backup servers and storage :). I wonder how much
>extra storage those
We currently use CCWS (previously ScanSafe) with the Anyconnect client.
Nice solution. Whether your in the office or remoting from a Starbucks,
the traffic is always proxied. We went with the solution because of a
couple reasons:
1. with multiple egress points on the corporate network, we didn'
You didn't quite play this one right.
You need to see if you can use them to get a ticket to the next
conference to meet them in person and discuss their proposals. Free
ticket to the next Nanog conference.
On 12/5/2013 2:52 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
> :: QualiSystems team met you during the 201
i am having scary logging from ESXI off a UCS-210-M2 with a MagaRAID
9261. if you have clue in this space, please contact me off list.
thanks.
[ esxi's lack of transparency to the hardware makes me crazy. i plan to
migrate to kvm when i have spare time, ha ha, and a spare box to hold
the vms
*Sarcasm* but lawyers seem to think it is REALLY important to add that load to
email servers, backup servers and storage :). I wonder how much extra storage
those simple extra bits/bytes have taken over the years?
~Richard
On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:39 PM, Rogan Schlassa wrote:
> Please dont reply
Please dont reply back with such legal disclaimers. It is basically SPAM
and of course nonsense.
The thought that you can send a email and force your companies terms on us
is rediculous.
If CISCO forces that in your sig then for one tell them to fuck off and two
use a different email.
On Dec 5,
On 12/05/2013 02:00 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> If AT&T has capped me, then, I haven’t managed to hit the cap as yet.
> Admittedly, the connection isn’t always as reliable as $CABLECO, but
> when it works, it tends to work at full speed and it does work the
> vast majority of the time.
AT&T threaten
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Owen DeLong wrote:
I generally get around 40-50 Mbps over LTE.
Downloading 500Gig at that rate would be roughly 1/2 of the maximum possible
throughput for the entire month.
Nope. 350 gigabyte in a month is an average of 1 megabit/s over the
entire month.
won’t reach pa
Is there someone on the list in CenturyLink Engineering involved in the
pacific north west? Please contact me off list.
Thanks,
Greg
On Dec 4, 2013, at 10:54 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> Depends on your carrier. From AT&T, I have $29 unlimited and I have
>> definitely cranked down more over that (faster) LTE connection in some
>> months than through my $100+ cable connection.
Thanks folks. Blogs.cisco.com should be back up now for both IPv4 and v6.
Thanks,
John
"We can't help everyone, but everyone can help someone."
John Stuppi, CISSP
Technical Leader
Strategic Security Research
jstu...@cisco.com
Phone: +1 732 516 5994
Mobile: 732 319 3886
CCIE, Security - 11
:: QualiSystems team met you during the 2011 Nanog
:: Conference in Denver.
No you didn't. This is completely false. In the
15+ years I have been on the NANOG mailing list I
have *never* been able to afford to attend a NANOG
conference because it's really expensive from Hawaii.
So, in addi
You are misunderstanding the political reality and are instead making
impermissible technical inferences.
Is moving bits between networks hard or expensive? No.
Is moving bits between asymmetric power relationships trivial? No.
When you think about how much roaming costs, you're thinking of the
I've been talking to their executive officer after doing that exact thing. 15
years ago roaming was very expensive.. But when you are selling something using
terminology like "free" or "unlimited", I believe you should be extremely
careful. I don't know how or who implemented this policy.. But t
Yes clients had both IPs in their relative DNS configuration settings.
Aaron Childs, CCNA
Associate Director, Networking
Information Technology
www.westfield.ma.edu/it
Please Note: new e-mail address - aa...@westfield.ma.edu
-Original Message-
From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Childs, Aaron wrote:
> Our issue was that 75.75.75.75 was not responding to queries at all and for
> some reason clients weren't getting redirected to 75.75.76.76.
did the clients not have 75.75.76.76 in their resolv.conf (or
equivalent) as the second nameserver
On Dec 4, 2013 11:31 PM, "Warren Bailey" <
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
>
> Blanket reply.. :)
>
> So at what point does unlimited mean unlimited? Roaming agreements have
always been two sided. In my case.. I roam on to AT&T's network, the same
as AT&T folk roam into tmo when they
And if anyone from rackspace is on this list, please feel free to help out as
that is where blogs.cisco.com is hosted (it's a wordpress site, not directly
under Cisco's control operationally).
Thanks,
- Mark
On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> My Cisco IPv6 contacts confirmed tha
http://dns.comcast.net/index.php/contactus
On 12/3/13, 2:46 PM, "Childs, Aaron" wrote:
>Good Afternoon,
>
>If there is a Comcast DNS Engineer on the list could you contact me
>off-list? We are experiencing an odd issue with 75.75.75.75.
>
>Thanks,
>Aaron
>
>
>[Description: Description: Descr
Is your issue that it gives out old DNS records? Because I am trying to
track something down for an user on Comcast who is still getting the old IP
of a VPN concentrator. The DNS records has a TTL of 30 minutes, yet a week
later the end user is still getting the old IP. Haven't been able to get
him
Tier 1 ISPs engage in settlement-free peering. Everyone else pays for transit.
I had a giant reply about politics but figured I'd save everyone the reading
time.
Suffice it to say, the regulatory environment in Wireless is different. It
costs more money than their model allows for you to use th
24 matches
Mail list logo
