On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> [snip]
>
+1 for MX or ASR 9000.
> Cisco ASR 9000, Juniper MX, Huawei NE40E, Alcatel-Lucent 7750, those kinds
> of routers are the ones I hear people using. Some go for the new Sup2T for
> the 6500, but I don't know how much more CPU
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Stefan wrote:
As $subj may infer, do you guys follow any type of network lifecycle in
your environment? If so - what would be some criteria you would consider
critical:
You'll probably get lots of different answers to this question depending
on where people are working. T
As $subj may infer, do you guys follow any type of network lifecycle in
your environment? If so - what would be some criteria you would consider
critical:
- consistent rate of cash flow, year after year, while replacing aging gear
(allowing for consistent budgetary planning)
- risk reduction while
+1 for Brocade MLXe. Used on our edge and *knock on wood* have not had any
issues with it ever. Full BGP routing table, multiple VRFs, QoS / bandwidth
management.
We also have a few Brocade CER series routers, which are awesome as well for
metro edge. And for political reasons a bunch of Cisco
+1 for Brocade MLXe. Good Price. Good stuff. Good TAC.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
> Am 29.11.2013 06:37, schrieb Jawaid Desktop:
> > We're a service provider, and we have a network full of Cat6509's.
> > We are finding that we are outgrowing them from the standpoin
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 11:51:46 -0500, Cutler James R said:
> According to Comcast's DOCSIS Devices page,
> http://mydeviceinfo.comcast.net/?s=3Di&so=1&e=0&d3=1&tier=-1&sc=84
> the Cisco DPC3008 is not supported for IPv6. You could always try
> enabling IPv6 on a system directly connected to the Cis
On Dec 9, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Cutler James R
> wrote:
>
>> This is disappointing to me as a user but good for me as an Apple stockholder
>
> I stopped using their [network] hardware and shifted to using real
> Access-Points do perform that f
On Dec 9, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Cutler James R wrote:
> This is disappointing to me as a user but good for me as an Apple stockholder
I stopped using their [network] hardware and shifted to using real
Access-Points do perform that function. They provide too little intelligence
when there is trou
On Dec 9, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Cutler James R wrote:
>
>> My conclusion is that Apple does not yet support IPv6 in any fashion for
>> Wireless Guest networks.
>
> Works for me on 7.7.2 on the latest hardware (802.1ac version with time
> capsule hdd
On 12/9/13 2:03 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Dec 9, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
It costs you nothing to let people use capacity that would otherwise go
to waste, and it increases the perceived value of your service. Your
customers will eventually find themselves depending on that exces
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Cutler James R wrote:
My conclusion is that Apple does not yet support IPv6 in any fashion for
Wireless Guest networks.
Works for me on 7.7.2 on the latest hardware (802.1ac version with time
capsule hdd). PD and everything.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Michael Brown
wrote:
> > On 13-12-09 01:19 PM, John Lightfoot wrote:
> >>
> >> We don't even support IPv5 yet, so it will be a while before we support
> >> v6.
> >
> > Naturally, as the odd-numbered rele
Hello,
It's probably an old problem which was already debated here.
We (130.79/16, AS2259) can't reach 143.104/16 (AS20252).
Actually, all packets are dropped on their way back to our network.
The probable cause is a conjunction of routing asymetry and uRPF check :
- 143.104/16 is behind a US uni
On Dec 9, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Cutler James R
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I opted for my minimal-effort solution. I installed a Motorola SB6121 and a
>> 5th gen Airport Extreme and turned them on. Of course I configured the
>> Airport Extreme
On Dec 9, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Cutler James R
> wrote:
>
>> According to Comcast’s DOCSIS Devices page,
>> http://mydeviceinfo.comcast.net/?s=i&so=1&e=0&d3=1&tier=-1&sc=84, the Cisco
>> DPC3008 is not supported for IPv6. You could a
- Original Message -
> From: "Jared Mauch"
> While fiber installation can be expensive, one needs to ask the local
> municipalities to install extra conduit every time the earth is broken
> for a local project.
You will perhaps recall that I put NANOG through teaching me that exact
thing
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Michael Brown wrote:
> On 13-12-09 01:19 PM, John Lightfoot wrote:
>>
>> We don't even support IPv5 yet, so it will be a while before we support
>> v6.
>
> Naturally, as the odd-numbered releases of IP are experimental. They should
> be focusing on the even-numbered
On Dec 9, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>> It costs you nothing to let people use capacity that would otherwise go
>> to waste, and it increases the perceived value of your service. Your
>> customers will eventually find themselves depending on that excess
>> capacity often enough that
On 13-12-09 01:19 PM, John Lightfoot wrote:
We don't even support IPv5 yet, so it will be a while before we support v6.
Naturally, as the odd-numbered releases of IP are experimental. They
should be focusing on the even-numbered releases for production use.
M.
--
Michael Brown| Th
On 12/5/13 5:39 PM, Rogan Schlassa wrote:
> Please dont reply back with such legal disclaimers. It is basically SPAM
> and of course nonsense.
>
> The thought that you can send a email and force your companies terms on us
> is ridiculous.
>
> If CISCO forces that in your sig then for one tell the
Since my Fios router has a way to configure IPv6 on it, I turned it on to
see but I couldn't get it to work. I called their technical to ask for
help/information about IPv6 support and was told "We don't even support
IPv5 yet, so it will be a while before we support v6."
John Lightfoot
On 12/9
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Justin M. Streiner
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> if work doesn't eat my evening I'll make an attempt at that
>> tonight/tomorrow.
>
>
> Thanks for reminding me that I need to get back on Verizon's case about
> getting IPv6 on Fios... :|
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
if work doesn't eat my evening I'll make an attempt at that tonight/tomorrow.
Thanks for reminding me that I need to get back on Verizon's case about
getting IPv6 on Fios... :|
jms
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> (this raised itself above my level of 'fixed in a weekend' project, so
>> my comcast v6 lays fallow... NOTE: this is NOT comcast's fault, in my
>> eyes.)
>
> i could take a picture, but i think you would recognize the boat. sigh.
I should be
Dear Colleagues,
We have published the program for JANOG 33 and welcome you to join us in
Beppu City, Japan, from 23rd-24th Jan 2014.
Most sessions are in Japanese only but there are a few sessions in English.
You are also welcome to connect with us through facebook and twitter for
updates in E
Oh, I agree. If I plug the Netgear box directly into my network,
everything works great. I
really believe it is a pFsene/m0n0wall issue.
Robert
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 11:44:14 -0500
Jared Mauch wrote:
I have no issues with the comcast business netgear box and normal
ra+dhcpv6. Not trying anythin
On 13-12-09 11:19 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
yea, so my 'saga' started with:
1) "dlink 615 doesn't like dhcp-pd ... and is flat broken for v6"
I had very borken things happen at home on my dlink-615 with their
busted-ass IPv6 code. Specifics are here:
http://serverfault.com/q/252083/2101
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> http://comcast6.net/ tells me that the local cmts is v6 enabled. my
> modem, a cisco dpc3008, is in the supported products list. so how do
> i turn the sucker on?
According to Comcast’s DOCSIS Devices page,
http://mydeviceinfo.comcast.net/?s=
I have no issues with the comcast business netgear box and normal ra+dhcpv6.
Not trying anything fancy as when I do, I spend too much time doing tech
support for my family. Flat lan makes it work.
Jared Mauch
> On Dec 9, 2013, at 11:32 AM, wrote:
>
> I feel your pain. I am on the Comcast Bus
- Original Message -
> From: "Phil Karn"
> On 12/06/2013 05:54 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> > Currently, without a limit, there is nothing to convince a end user to
> > make any attempt at conserving bandwidth and no revenue to cover the
> > cost of additional equipment to serve high bandw
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 11:19:18 -0500
Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
do you see PD from your modem? or RA's?
still trying to educate the opwnwrt (attitude adjustment on netgear
3800).
root@wrt-biwa:~# opkg update
Downloading
http://downloads.openw
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 11:19:18AM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> do you see PD from your modem? or RA's?
> >
> > still trying to educate the opwnwrt (attitude adjustment on netgear
> > 3800).
...
> yea, so my 'saga' started with:
> 1)
> (this raised itself above my level of 'fixed in a weekend' project, so
> my comcast v6 lays fallow... NOTE: this is NOT comcast's fault, in my
> eyes.)
i could take a picture, but i think you would recognize the boat. sigh.
randy
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> do you see PD from your modem? or RA's?
>
> still trying to educate the opwnwrt (attitude adjustment on netgear
> 3800).
>
> root@wrt-biwa:~# opkg update
> Downloading
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment/12.09/ar71xx/generic/pac
> do you see PD from your modem? or RA's?
still trying to educate the opwnwrt (attitude adjustment on netgear
3800).
root@wrt-biwa:~# opkg update
Downloading
http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment/12.09/ar71xx/generic/packages//Packages.gz.
Inflating
http://downloads.openwrt.org/attit
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> http://comcast6.net/ tells me that the local cmts is v6 enabled. my
> modem, a cisco dpc3008, is in the supported products list. so how do
> i turn the sucker on?
do you see PD from your modem? or RA's? (guessing probably not, or
you'd not be
On 12/8/2013 9:48 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Very specifically:
A 3270 that took 5 seconds of delay and then *snapped* the entire screen
up at once was perceived as "faster" than a 9600 tty that painted the same
entire screen in about a second and a half or so. Don't remember who it
was either, bu
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:34:07PM -0800, Robert L Mathews wrote:
> Sadly, ICANN compliance will not do a thing for any individual domain
> name incident. Their mechanism for such things is to pass complaints on
> to the registrar, even when the registrar IS the problem, as if they're
> the Better
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:37:05 +, Gary Buhrmaster said:
> It has been a long long time, but for the truly crazy, I
> thought it was possible to write single characters at a
> time (using a Set Buffer Address and then the character)
> as long as you had set up the field attributes previously.
> L
http://comcast6.net/ tells me that the local cmts is v6 enabled. my
modem, a cisco dpc3008, is in the supported products list. so how do
i turn the sucker on?
randy
Skype previously showed a warning message showing that the Skype API /
Third party applications would stop working as of December 2013.
I would bet there was a silent forceful update to the software...
--
-JH
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> I just caught an alert on my
I just caught an alert on my desktop about high disk activity by Skype,
looking at the details it shows a 472MB of disk write activity, no
notification of upgrade or any other messages.
Trying to see if I can find what was recently written.
This the first time I see a report about such high disk
On 04/12/13 23:48, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Please tell me what provider is selling 100Mbit for $20-30 in the 408-532-
> area of San Jose, California.
>
> Currently, the only provider capable of delivering more than 768k wired
> here is charging me $100+/month for 30-50Mbps maximum.
>
> I could g
43 matches
Mail list logo
