On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 08/01/2014 18:14, Christopher Morrow wrote:
question... there's people that have done this before even :)
Well,
Out of 25 accounts, 22 where for spamming. Even with captcha, etc.
Since then I put a mention to contact modera...@bcp38.info for
account creation.
You'll see it if you are going through the [Log in] link
Well,
Those poor guys are under perma DNS Amplifcation DDoS for what seems
to be 2 weeks now.
About 7 days ago they started sending us emails for what is less
than 2MB worth of data (~500 packets) which is about how long it takes
for filters to take effect.
But after 1 week of
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net wrote:
Well,
Those poor guys are under perma DNS Amplifcation DDoS for what seems
to be 2 weeks now.
they seem to be hosted at internap, you'd think they could just ask
internap to fix this for them instead, eh?
On Jan 24, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net wrote:
Is there a [Spoofing Tracking Squad] out there?
( We're on GT-T/nLayer/Tinet )
You haven’t been able to get GTT/nLayer/TINet to track the traffic back?
Details are welcome, either here or in private. There are
On Jan 24, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
You haven’t been able to get GTT/nLayer/TINet to track the traffic back?
Details are welcome, either here or in private. There are plenty of people
who will chase and fix this stuff when they’re aware of it.
When OpenResolver Project was
On 24 January 2014 16:23, Chris Boyd cb...@gizmopartners.com wrote:
On Jan 24, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
You haven’t been able to get GTT/nLayer/TINet to track the traffic back?
Details are welcome, either here or in private. There are plenty of people
who will chase and fix
To all,
Has anyone successfully tunneled L2 PDU's (STP, CDP, LLDP) over a L2TPv3
pseudowire tunnel, i.e. should I be able to see CDP neighbors across the
tunnel? For some reason if I encapsulated dot1q on a router sub-interface and
try and pass traffic across the trunk the downstream switch
Yes, 10 years ago on 10720, CDP and LACP worked like a charm
Regards,
Jeff
On Jan 24, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com wrote:
To all,
Has anyone successfully tunneled L2 PDU's (STP, CDP, LLDP) over a L2TPv3
pseudowire tunnel, i.e. should I be able to see CDP
Sorry for the noise, but we are looking for somebody that can help us track
down a single IP address that is seemingly blackholed by TW/RR in a core
somewhere in Atlanta. We have verified that the IP doesn't have any abuse
history and isn't blackholed from our end. Just started this morning.
A while back I enlisted help for setting up a small email list server.
It is now complete but only AOL is blocking my outbound email.
Using their tools they did not report my IP as having a bad reputation.
I applied for white listing my single IP and provided ALL the necessary
feedback and
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
On Jan 24, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Robert Webb rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
A while back I enlisted help for setting up a small email list server. It is
now complete but only AOL is blocking my outbound email.
Using their tools they did not report my IP as having a bad reputation. I
applied for
On 01/24/2014 01:14 PM, Robert Webb wrote:
A while back I enlisted help for setting up a small email list server.
It is now complete but only AOL is blocking my outbound email.
Using their tools they did not report my IP as having a bad
reputation. I applied for white listing my single IP
On 1/24/2014 2:53 PM, Robert Webb wrote:
A while back I enlisted help for setting up a small email list server.
It is now complete but only AOL is blocking my outbound email.
Send me your IP (off list if desired) and I'll evaluate it and possibly
provide some feedback that may be helpful!
--
Given how much traffic these days is CDN and streaming, is that number
really supportable?
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer
On Jan 24, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Given how much traffic these days is CDN and streaming, is that number
really supportable?
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet
http://www.seattleix.net/agg.htm
On 01/24/2014 09:08 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Given how much traffic these days is CDN and streaming, is that number
really supportable?
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet
In the interview they are saying that if Google is down, lots of people
don't have
I understand OSPF default calculation for cost doesn't include delay. I am
looking for a formula that I can use to manually set the OSPF costs that
factors in delay.
When using OSPF's default costs, the shortest path is not always the optimal
path.
Example
New York to Los Angeles. Assuming
- Original Message -
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet
It's just been pointed out to me that, even though Marketplace just posted
the link to that piece, the dateline is from August. My apologies for
not
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Stefan Neufeind
na...@stefan-neufeind.de wrote:
In the interview they are saying that if Google is down, lots of people
don't have DNS anymore. So that accounts for an even larger drop than
just no Youtube. Hmm - why would people use those resolvers, besides
Some networks I have worked with took the average latency of each link and
assigned that (with some constant multiple) as the interface cost.
Of course this all fails miserably if you are using anything like MPLS
underneath your OSPF.
Owen
On Jan 24, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Erik Sundberg
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Neufeind na...@stefan-neufeind.de
On 01/24/2014 09:08 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Given how much traffic these days is CDN and streaming, is that
number really supportable?
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet
On 1/24/2014 12:31 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jay Ashworthj...@baylink.com
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet
It's just been pointed out to me that, even though Marketplace just posted
the link to that piece, the
Some networks I have worked with took the average latency of each link and
assigned that (with some constant multiple) as the interface cost.
Of course this all fails miserably if you are using anything like MPLS
underneath your OSPF.
But then when using MPLS underneath, then MPLS
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:22:58 +0100, Stefan Neufeind said:
just no Youtube. Hmm - why would people use those resolvers, besides
being lazy in configuring a proper resolver-address.
A lot of people make value judgements on the relative likelyhood of finding
evil in DNS packets coming from
Hi,
Well the abusers started to use burst and then switching targeted IP.
Last time I opened a ticket with GT-T/nLayer for a ~120Mbps NTP DDoS
Amplification attempt toward 2 of my IP's.
. after 2h, I called them directly to be told they lost my
original request;
.
On 14-01-24 03:40 PM, Shrdlu wrote:
On 1/24/2014 12:31 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jay Ashworthj...@baylink.com
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet
It's just been pointed out to me that, even though Marketplace just
Eric,
Issues:
1.OSPF (SPF) can only produce a SPT based on cost (metric).
Anything else would require CSPF rather than SPF.
2. Delay is not distributed as part of an IGP update
Typical constrains distributed are: bandwidth, color, some others
In IETF we are working to also be able to
Hello everyone,
I work for a small service provider starting to offer MPLS services between
Europe and several african countries. At present time we own a small Cisco
network, but we are starting to need a better inventory of services and network
resources and better troubleticketing procedures.
Robert,
Please email me the details. Also please provide the ticket number for
investigation. Thanks.
Vish Subramanian
AOL Mail Postmaster Operations
-Original Message-
From: Robert Webb rw...@ropeguru.com
To: nanog nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Fri, Jan 24, 2014 1:17 pm
Subject: AOL
On Jan 24, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Raymond Burkholder r...@oneunified.net wrote:
Some networks I have worked with took the average latency of each link and
assigned that (with some constant multiple) as the interface cost.
Of course this all fails miserably if you are using anything like MPLS
- Original Message -
From: Shrdlu shr...@deaddrop.org
You sure? I think that there is an actual outage, unrelated to the
article you'd posted.
http://techcrunch.com/2014/01/24/gmail-glitch-is-causing-thousands-of-emails-to-be-sent-to-one-mans-hotmail-account/
There was an outage
- Original Message -
From: Octavio Alfageme palae...@palaemon.es
we are starting to need a better inventory of services and network
resources and better troubleticketing procedures. We can not afford acquiring
complicated and expensive tools at present time.I would be grateful if
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net wrote:
Hi,
Well the abusers started to use burst and then switching targeted IP.
Last time I opened a ticket with GT-T/nLayer for a ~120Mbps NTP DDoS
Amplification attempt toward 2 of my IP's.
. after 2h,
This report has been generated at Fri Jan 24 21:13:35 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
BGP Update Report
Interval: 16-Jan-14 -to- 23-Jan-14 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS14420 44341 2.2% 183.2 -- CORPORACION NACIONAL DE
TELECOMUNICACIONES - CNT EP
2 -
On 01/24/2014 09:46 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:22:58 +0100, Stefan Neufeind said:
just no Youtube. Hmm - why would people use those resolvers, besides
being lazy in configuring a proper resolver-address.
A lot of people make value judgements on the relative
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Neufeind na...@stefan-neufeind.de
If it's just some DNS your provider hands out, I agree it's not much
better as well. (But you might possibly assume your provider has less
interst to spy on all your emails, your dns-queries and the like.)
You might
There was a lot of discussion about this figure back in August when the
relevant outage occurred.
From memory, a large percentage of the traffic drop was from other sites
breaking as a result of Google not being available. ie, a site completely
unrelated to Google, potentially being served by a
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Stefan Neufeind
na...@stefan-neufeind.de wrote:
interst to spy on all your emails, your dns-queries and the like.)
FUD much? have you read the public-dns ToS and privacy statements?
if you haven't you might want to:
- Original Message -
From: Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au
A non-trivial percentage of the Internet is in some way or other dependent
on things like Google Analytics/maps/etc, Facebook likes, Twitter recent
tweets, etc, such that if any of those services are not available the site
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Jeff Tantsura
jeff.tants...@ericsson.comwrote:
Eric,
Issues:
1.OSPF (SPF) can only produce a SPT based on cost (metric).
Anything else would require CSPF rather than SPF.
A CSPF based protocol would be a suitable algorithm for adding hard
constraints,
On 14-01-24 05:22 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
If you can't, RT is pretty nice, though quite a bit more complex. It used
to have an asset tracking snap-on, but I don't know what the status of that
is now that the main package has revved to 4.0.
+1 on RT being awesome, but a little daunting to set
On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Octavio Alfageme palae...@palaemon.es wrote:
Hello everyone,
I work for a small service provider starting to offer MPLS services between
Europe and several african countries. At present time we own a small Cisco
network, but we are starting to need a better
Hello,
Can someone from Charter Communications enlighten us to if you are
having any issues or reach out to me directly.
We are seeing some interesting traceroutes from St. Louis, Mo to St.
Louis Charter customers via Level3, Qwest, or Cogent. Packets are being
sent all over resulting in
The auto-cost capability in some vendors devices seems to have left many
people ignoring the link metrics within their IGP. From what I recall in
the standards - bandwidth is one possible link metric but certainly not
the only one. Network designers are free (and I would encourage to) pick
On Jan 25, 2014, at 6:07 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
I wonder what percentage of large website operators whose site designs have
such external dependencies have had it occur to them to include those
external services in their monitoring systems?
This presupposes that they
48 matches
Mail list logo
