FYI.
Cheers,
Mark.
--- Begin Message ---
Greetings to you all.
We would like to take this opportunity to introduce to
you a new network operators group, SAFNOG.
SAFNOG stands for Southern Africa Network Operators
Group. As you might guess, it is a NOG for the Southern
African region, with a vis
Randy Bush wrote:
>i am on the apricot 2014 pc. we do not have a submission on nap defense. can
>someone please do one?
I can, see my reply on apops.
---
Roland Dobbins
i am on the apricot 2014 pc. we do not have a submission on ntp
defense. can someone please do one?
randy
On Jan 28, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Jan 28, 2014, at 1:50 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:06:31 -0500, Jared Mauch said:
>>
>>> 52731 ASN7922
>>
>>> It includes IP address where you send a DNS packet to it and another IP
>>> address responds
There are plenty Direct Connect partners that’ll be happy to take your data
from NOTA in Miami to a remote AWS location. See:
http://aws.amazon.com/directconnect/partners/
On 1/28/14, 2:55 PM, "Warren Bailey"
mailto:wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>>
wrote:
We¹re looking at potential co
So essentially, you are looking for a 'direct' x-connect to AWS ?
and not wanting to go thru a peering fabric or any other network ?
Regards
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snap
Hello all.
Kindly see below/attached, per subject.
Please distribute within your local/regional communities.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Mark.
--- Begin Message ---
Greetings to you all.
We would like to take this opportunity to introduce to
you a new network operators group, SAFNOG.
SAFNOG stands for S
On 1/28/2014 1:07 PM, Nick Olsen wrote:
While I see what you're saying. It's still not "Spoofed".
The device in question receives the request. And then generates a response
with the src address of the egress interface of the device dst to the IP
and port that requested it... In this case. The G
Correct, The assumption is that NAT was in use here.
After a quick phone conversation with Jared. We concluded that at least in
the specific case I was speaking about, I was correct in that nothing was
"Spoofed". However, Explained further in detail about what he sees from
other IP's on that li
Jarad is correct. There is lack of BCP38 filtering in the CPE ASN.
Either the packet has gone
"probe" -> CPE ->(*) recursive server -> "probe"
or
"probe" -> CPE -> recursive server -> CPE ->(*) "probe"
(*) indicates the packet that should have been blocked depending apon
how
On Jan 28, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Nick Olsen wrote:
> While I see what you're saying. It's still not "Spoofed".
>
> The device in question receives the request. And then generates a response
> with the src address of the egress interface of the device dst to the IP and
> port that requested it...
While I see what you're saying. It's still not "Spoofed".
The device in question receives the request. And then generates a response
with the src address of the egress interface of the device dst to the IP
and port that requested it... In this case. The GRE tunnel. Unless I'm
missing something
On Jan 28, 2014, at 2:57 PM, Nick Olsen wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> Our's listed for AS36295 are two customers, Which I know for a fact have
> their default route set out of a GRE tunnel interface. So while we hand them
> the request to their interface IP we've assigned them. The response is
> actu
On Jan 28, 2014, at 2:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/2014 2:16 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2014, at 1:50 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:06:31 -0500, Jared Mauch said:
>>>
52731 ASN7922
>>>
It includes IP address where you se
Agreed.
Our's listed for AS36295 are two customers, Which I know for a fact have their
default route set out of a GRE tunnel interface. So while we hand them the
request to their interface IP we've assigned them. The response is actually
sent, And transported via the customers GRE Tunnel, And H
David,
* David Miller (dmil...@tiggee.com) wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 2014, at 1:50 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> >> Hang on Jared, I'm trying to wrap my head around this. You're saying that
> >> AS7922 has over 50K IP addresses which, if you send a DNS query to that IP,
> >> you get an answer
On 1/28/2014 2:16 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Jan 28, 2014, at 1:50 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:06:31 -0500, Jared Mauch said:
>>
>>> 52731 ASN7922
>>
>>> It includes IP address where you send a DNS packet to it and another IP
>>> address responds to the q
On Jan 28, 2014, at 1:50 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:06:31 -0500, Jared Mauch said:
>
>> 52731 ASN7922
>
>> It includes IP address where you send a DNS packet to it and another IP
>> address responds to the query, e.g.:
>
>> The data only includes those where
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:06:31 -0500, Jared Mauch said:
> 52731 ASN7922
> It includes IP address where you send a DNS packet to it and another IP
> address responds to the query, e.g.:
> The data only includes those where the source-ASN and dest-asn of these
> packets dont match.
Hang on
Tracking a really world-class AT&T fiber outage in MD:
> > Our AT&T service delivery manager just updated the list for us:
> >
> > · 7 OC192s
> > · 7 OC48
> > · 22 Core T3/DS3s
> > · 8 additional T3/DS3s
[ Apologies for the lack of attribution; they fell apart while I was
trying to clip the quo
We see this all the time with banking sites and some of the stock
trading ones
Todd
On 1/28/2014 5:06 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jan 26, 2014, at 12:47 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
something like 6 years ago, and couldn't get any traction on it then;
I'm not sure I think much has changed -- appar
...on Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:37:14AM +0100, Octavio Alfageme wrote:
> network, but we are starting to need a better inventory of services and
> network
> resources and better troubleticketing procedures. We can not afford acquiring
For the inventory and documentation part, Netdot is pretty c
On Jan 26, 2014, at 12:47 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> something like 6 years ago, and couldn't get any traction on it then;
> I'm not sure I think much has changed -- apparently, extracting your
> BP thoughts from mailing list postings and putting them into a wiki is
> more effort than most NANOG
23 matches
Mail list logo
