As precaution, you should always deny ipv6 unicast on v4 sessions, and
vice versa.
On 5/3/2014 午後 03:01, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:
Between peering routers on a dual-stacked network, is it considered best
practices to have two BGP sessions (on
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:
>
> Between peering routers on a dual-stacked network, is it considered best
> practices to have two BGP sessions (one for v4 and one for v6) between
> them? Or is it better to put v4 in the v6 session or v6 in the v4 session?
>
> According to d
I need a sanity check.
An incumbent in Canada has revealed that its voice service on FTTP
deployments is based on H.248 MEGACO (Media Gateway Controller).
Are there any examples of CLEC access to such FTTP deployments ?
(for instance, an area where the copper was removed, leaving only fibre
to h
On May 2, 2014, at 12:44 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:
>
> Between peering routers on a dual-stacked network, is it considered best
> practices to have two BGP sessions (one for v4 and one for v6) between them?
> Or is it better to put v4 in the v6 session or v6 in the v4 session?
Separate v4 and v
2014-05-02 16:36 GMT+02:00 Matthew Galgoci :
>
> Hey There,
>
> I was just wondering, for people who are doing netflow analysis with
> open source tools and who are doing at least 10k or more flows per
> second, what are you using?
>
> I know of three tool sets:
>
> - The classic osu flow-tools an
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>
> On May 2, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:
>
> >
> > Between peering routers on a dual-stacked network, is it considered best
> > practices to have two BGP sessions (one for v4 and one for v6) between
> > them? Or is it better to put
BGP Update Report
Interval: 24-Apr-14 -to- 01-May-14 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS7029 179743 8.1% 788.3 -- WINDSTREAM - Windstream
Communications Inc,US
2 - AS9829
This report has been generated at Fri May 2 21:13:55 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Hi Mans,
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Måns Nilsson wrote:
> This is a field where v4 next-hops are essential to make things
> work. In that context, allocating 100.64.0.0/10 to CGN was
> especially un-clever...
>
Would you expound a bit on what you mean here? I don't quite follow but I
am ve
Subject: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack) Date: Fri, May 02, 2014 at
07:44:33PM + Quoting Deepak Jain (dee...@ai.net):
>
> Between peering routers on a dual-stacked network, is it considered best
> practices to have two BGP sessions (one for v4 and one for v6) between them?
> Or is
>
> Between peering routers on a dual-stacked network, is it considered best
> practices to have two BGP sessions (one for v4 and one for v6) between them?
> Or is it better to put v4 in the v6 session or v6 in the v4 session?
>
> According to docs, obviously all of these are supported and if
Two different sessions using two different transport protocols. The v4 BGP
session should have address family v6 disabled and vice versa. Exchange v4
routes over a v4 TCP connection, exchange v6 routes over a v6 TCP connection.
Just treat them as independent protocols.
-Laszlo
On May 2, 2
On May 2, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:
>
> Between peering routers on a dual-stacked network, is it considered best
> practices to have two BGP sessions (one for v4 and one for v6) between them?
> Or is it better to put v4 in the v6 session or v6 in the v4 session?
We use v4 transpor
Between peering routers on a dual-stacked network, is it considered best
practices to have two BGP sessions (one for v4 and one for v6) between them? Or
is it better to put v4 in the v6 session or v6 in the v4 session?
According to docs, obviously all of these are supported and if both sides ar
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap
"NANOG" wrote on 05/02/2014
11:00:15 AM:
> From: freed...@freedman.net (Avi Freedman)
>
> There's also SiLK from CMU. It's powerful but has a learning curve.
>
SiLK is very good. See FlowViewer for a powerful front-end to the tool.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/flowviewer/
Also supports
pmacct (http://www.pmacct.net/) is another pretty awesome open source tool.
Leslie
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Avi Freedman wrote:
>
> There's also SiLK from CMU. It's powerful but has a learning curve.
>
> I also see pmacct being used both by some end networks and by
> some vendors as part
There's also SiLK from CMU. It's powerful but has a learning curve.
I also see pmacct being used both by some end networks and by
some vendors as part of systems.
Avi
> Hey There,
>
> I was just wondering, for people who are doing netflow analysis with
> open source tools and who are doing a
On 2014-05-02 16:36, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
[..]
> Is there anything else I've missed? A few folks here really seem to like
> nfsen/nfdump.
For OSS that is pretty much it that really matters (maybe you could add
Argus if you really want though).
For a long long list, check out Simon Leinen's site
On May 2, 2014, at 9:36 PM, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
> A few folks here really seem to like
> nfsen/nfdump.
The good thing about nfdump/nfsen is that you can customize it and do a lot
with it, and it's easy to get set up and running.
This is the canonical list of open-source NetFlow tools:
Hey There,
I was just wondering, for people who are doing netflow analysis with
open source tools and who are doing at least 10k or more flows per
second, what are you using?
I know of three tool sets:
- The classic osu flow-tools and the modern continuation/fork.
- ntop
- nfdump/nfsen
Is ther
Well,
I was just a suit drone into one of their 100 little IT firm around
the world.
The nearest I got to an actual AA associate was during a 1 month
project in Chicago (:
Wasted my time really... They billed 3 months to their clients, for
a project that took 1 month, and I was a
22 matches
Mail list logo