On 23/Oct/15 23:02, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> There is running code now for IETF HOMENET using Quagga that speaks
> IS-IS over IPv6 (using IP proto 124) if you want to, it's configurable
> per-interface.
>
> I do not know at this time what the status is for mainline Quagga
> IS-IS, but I've
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Pablo Lucena wrote:
A lot of carriers use ISIS in the core so they can make use of the'
overload bit' with a 'set-overload-bit on-startup wait-for-bgp". Keeps
them from black holing Traffic while BGP reconverges., when you have
millions of routes to converge it can take
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Mark Tinka wrote:
I'm not really sure what the hold-up is, but I know Mikael, together
with the good folks at netDEF (Martin and Alistair) are working hard on
fixing these issues. While I have not had much time to provide them with
feedback on their progress, it is high on
> A lot of carriers use ISIS in the core so they can make use of the'
> overload bit' with a 'set-overload-bit on-startup wait-for-bgp". Keeps
> them from black holing Traffic while BGP reconverges., when you have
> millions of routes to converge it can take forever. It's also a really
> handy
A lot of carriers use ISIS in the core so they can make use of the' overload
bit' with a 'set-overload-bit on-startup wait-for-bgp". Keeps them from black
holing Traffic while BGP reconverges., when you have millions of routes to
converge it can take forever. It's also a really handy tool w
Its oauth they require now. Thunderbird bug
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=849540
On 23/10/2015 19:20, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Christopher Morrow"
>
>> Incoming settings
>> IMAP server: imap.gmail.com
>> Port: 993
>> Security type: SSL (always)
Not protocols as much as less secure ssl ciphers is my guess
--srs
> On 23-Oct-2015, at 9:50 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Christopher Morrow"
>
>> Incoming settings
>> IMAP server: imap.gmail.com
>> Port: 993
>> Security type: SSL (always)
>>
>> Outgoin
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:41 AM, marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr
wrote:
> sorry for that, but the only one I've heard about switching his core IGP is
> Yahoo. I've no precision, and it's really interest me.
> I know that there had OSPF in the DC area, and ISIS in the core, and decide
> to switch the cor
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:57 AM, marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ?
> IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what reason ?
> Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some international
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Morrow"
> Incoming settings
> IMAP server: imap.gmail.com
> Port: 993
> Security type: SSL (always)
>
> Outgoing settings
> SMTP server: smtp.gmail.com
> Port: 465
> Security type: SSL (always)
Hijack: to use k9mail with gmail IMAP, I have to en
- Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Morrow"
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Jay Ashworth
> wrote:
> > We need to do host-mode IPSEC out of AWS to a company in the DC/VA area that
> > is on L3; AWS apparently will only do network mode IPSEC, and they won't
> > take
> > that, so
Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Krenn, Thomas A
wrote:
> We're told by AT&T this started around 11:30 CT and by XO that it was
> resolved around 22:00 CT. Seems a link between AS7018 and AS2828 was
> saturated in Chicago.
>
>
> Tom Krenn | Optum
> IT Networ
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> We need to do host-mode IPSEC out of AWS to a company in the DC/VA area that
> is on L3; AWS apparently will only do network mode IPSEC, and they won't take
> that, so we'll need to hop.
>
'will only do network mode' because the VM you
We need to do host-mode IPSEC out of AWS to a company in the DC/VA area that
is on L3; AWS apparently will only do network mode IPSEC, and they won't take
that, so we'll need to hop.
Anyone got a VPS provider in that area they like so we can set up the
bank-shot?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashwo
ghu saave us from more committees
On 23/Oct/15 11:00, marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr wrote:
> by having multiple areas, therefore ABR which deny routers and network
> LSA, you introduce summarization (ABR only send summary LSA, mean
> subnet info, not topology info) in your network.
> Thus you loose informations and do not have a com
by having multiple areas, therefore ABR which deny routers and network
LSA, you introduce summarization (ABR only send summary LSA, mean subnet
info, not topology info) in your network.
Thus you loose informations and do not have a complete topology of your
network. I guess MPLS/TE prefer to sea
On 23 October 2015 at 11:54, Mark Tinka wrote:
Hey,
> Well, on the basis that an attack is made easier if you are running
> IS-IS on a vulnerable interface, in theory, an attack would be highly
> difficult if a vulnerable interface were not running IS-IS to begin with.
Assuming that interface w
On 23/Oct/15 10:48, Saku Ytti wrote:
> I believe this is because you need 802.3 (as opposed to EthernetII)
> and rudimentary CLNS implementation, both which are very annoying from
> programmer point of view.
I'm not really sure what the hold-up is, but I know Mikael, together
with the good folk
On 23 October 2015 at 08:31, Mark Tinka wrote:
Hey,
> Quagga is an example of a case where IS-IS is seriously lagging behind
> OSPF to the point of not being useable at all.
I believe this is because you need 802.3 (as opposed to EthernetII)
and rudimentary CLNS implementation, both which are v
sorry for that, but the only one I've heard about switching his core IGP
is Yahoo. I've no precision, and it's really interest me.
I know that there had OSPF in the DC area, and ISIS in the core, and
decide to switch the core from ISIS to OSPF.
Why spend so much time/risk to switch from ISIS to O
21 matches
Mail list logo
