> Well, if you take a route, change its origin as your own (or any
> other) and re-announce it (perhaps just a smaller prefix of it) I
> would assume some intent.
>
> Or they are super whoopsies.
the original 7007, telkom malasia, ... were super whoopsies. the
classic of redistributing bgp into
Er, I should have mentioned 'Spokane, WA'.
On Nov 19, 2015 4:39 PM, "Aaron C. de Bruyn" wrote:
> I know the east side of my state was nailed with a big storm. The Gov
> declared a state of emergency.
>
> Comcast service for several of my clients has understandably been down
> since Tuesday.
>
>
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:24:09 -0800, Arturo Servin said:
> Well, if you take a route, change its origin as your own (or any other) and
> re-announce it (perhaps just a smaller prefix of it) I would assume some
> intent.
>
> Or they are super whoopsies.
AS7007 was a whoopsie. And in fact, I'll go
I know the east side of my state was nailed with a big storm. The Gov
declared a state of emergency.
Comcast service for several of my clients has understandably been down
since Tuesday.
I called in a few times over the last two days and the automated message
keeps saying "service should be rest
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:15 PM, wrote:
> > How about Origin Obfuscation
>
> Obfuscation implies intent. Most leaks and mis-announcements don't
> have intent because they're whoopsies.
>
Well, if you take a route, change its origin as your own (or any other) and
re-announce it (perhaps just a
Origin NAT? ;)
Ken
> On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:15 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:21:32 -0600, David Edelman said:
>> How about Origin Obfuscation
>
> Obfuscation implies intent. Most leaks and mis-announcements don't
> have intent because they're whoopsies.
On 11/19/15 6:08 AM, John Peach wrote:
> Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge
> spike in rejections from AOL recently?
We also saw a large increase in this "AOL will not accept delivery of
this message" problem earlier this week, despite also having "good
reputation"
Hi,
On 11/18/2015 05:28 PM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote:
I'm evaluating different datacenters and vendors accross the globe and it
isn't worthy to perform tests like DNS, traceroute, ping and HTTP GET from
my office. I need to be able to perform this tests remotely, from multiple
endpoints.
As
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:30:17 -0600
Blake Hudson wrote:
>
>
> John Peach wrote on 11/19/2015 8:08 AM:
> > Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge
> > spike in rejections from AOL recently?
> Yes.
>
> > There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a
John Peach wrote on 11/19/2015 8:08 AM:
Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge
spike in rejections from AOL recently?
Yes.
There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a
generic message:
Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383
> So 7007 (laundering) might be (or not) a subset of a hijack which is a
> subset of mis-origination.
> What's the tree for a leak? I think a more structured approach is
> necessary if we are to delve on
> both technical definitions and intent.
you can make it as complex as you want. and you're n
folks,
we are seeking additional Ark vantage points
( http://www.caida.org/projects/ark/ )
to support a variety of projects but especially motivated by our
NSF-funded project to map and measure interconnection in the Internet:
http://www.caida.org/funding/nets-congestion/
(recent pape
Hello Kurt,
Like others have commented RIPE Atlas works very well and many people use
it with much success. The only limiting factor for you will be HTTP GET
tests but for other tests you mentioned it will run fine. I would
definitely recommend to give it one more try.
I would like to mention our
Randy Bush wrote:
> some friends and i were talking about recent routing cfs, and found we
> needed a clearer taxonomy. i throw this out.
>
> leak - i receive P and send it on to folk to whom i should not send
>it for business reasons (transit, peer, ...)
>
> mis-origination - i originat
Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge
spike in rejections from AOL recently?
There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a
generic message:
Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383:
mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol error
15 matches
Mail list logo
