Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

2016-07-11 Thread Davide Davini
On 01/07/2016 21:52, Mike Jones wrote: > I am in contact with a couple of network operators trying to prod them > to deploy IPv6, I figured that 10 minutes to send a couple of emails > was worth the effort to make them "see a customer demand" (now none of > them can use the excuse that nobody has a

Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <222bac2d-800b-93c7-7d17-bd469e858...@gmail.com>, Davide Davini writ es: > On 01/07/2016 21:52, Mike Jones wrote: > > I am in contact with a couple of network operators trying to prod them > > to deploy IPv6, I figured that 10 minutes to send a couple of emails > > was worth the effort

Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

2016-07-11 Thread Davide Davini
On 11/07/2016 09:24, Mark Andrews wrote: >> Our provider sale representative, who is the most tech savvy sale-rep I >> ever encountered by far, which is not a very high bar, but still, said >> something like: >> "You shouldn't worry about that, we have plenty of IPv4 addresses >> left... and beside

Re: New Office, New Network. Questions.

2016-07-11 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:53:52 +0300, Nikolai Petrov said: > 1. Currently we do not have IPv6 in our network but I have seen the ISP is > giving us a "/56 Block" which from what I understand is a couple hundred "/64 > Subnets". I think you can only have /64 subnets in IPv6. In our IPv4 setup we You

Re: New Office, New Network. Questions.

2016-07-11 Thread alvin nanog
hi nikolai - oops.. this got long based on my experiences/opinions :-) On 07/10/16 at 09:53pm, Nikolai Petrov wrote: > We are moving to our new offices in two months and I have access to the > building already. > My task is to set up the entire network for the company. > The previous administra

New Office, New Network. Questions.

2016-07-11 Thread Nikolai Petrov
Hello NANOG, I am Nikolai and I am a Network Administrator in a Russian middle-sized company. We do not have a large list with Networks in Russia so I am using the American list. I hope you can help me with some problems that I have. We are moving to our new offices in two months and I have acc

Re: New Office, New Network. Questions.

2016-07-11 Thread William Herrin
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Nikolai Petrov wrote: > I thought of taking the chance to remove some > "technical debt" and make everything from > scratch again. Hi Nikolai, This is a rookie mistake. Every in-place system encodes business knowledge, most of it forgotten and much of it still re

Comcast postmaster?

2016-07-11 Thread Brian Rak
Is there anyone here that can put me in touch with a Comcast mail server administrator? It seems that they've firewalled off some of our IPv6 space, and I can't seem to find any contact information. Interestingly, I can't even fill out their blocklist removal form, because it only accepts IPv

Re: New Office, New Network. Questions.

2016-07-11 Thread Scott Weeks
--- b...@herrin.us wrote: From: William Herrin > Also, can I use "VRRP" to load balance traffic to > our DNS look-up "recursor"? No. VRRP is a failover system. It has nothing to do with load balancing. I have seen this before: rtr1 and rtr2

Re: packet loss question

2016-07-11 Thread James Greig
That's the one:) Kind regards James Greig > On 11 Jul 2016, at 01:26, Mel Beckman wrote: > > James, > > You may be thinking of this presentation: > > https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Sunday/RAS_Traceroute_N47_Sun.pdf > > -mel beckman > >> On Jul 10, 2016, at 4:49 PM,

Re: packet loss question

2016-07-11 Thread cpolish
On 2016-07-11 11:26, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <25577fe1-6366-4d6d-b82e-a779193cb...@beckman.org>, Mel Beckman > writ > The Internet Standard MTU's are 68 octets for IPv4 (RFC 791) and > 1280 octets for IPv6 (RFC 2460). > > Every size greater than those is subject to negotiation. Now mo