#Devil'sAdvocate
On 01/17/2018 07:28 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
If one were to deploy whitebox switches, X86 servers, low cost ARM and
MIBPS CPE devices, and basically anything that can run linux today, what
network operating system would you recommend?
Linux.
I fail to see the need for
On 01/17/2018 07:48 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
On Wed 2018-Jan-17 23:11:14 +, Matthew Smee
wrote:
Yeah, it'd be silly for organisations to try and standardise their
environments for services or infrastructure.
Was this spoken tongue-in-check, or in all
On Wed 2018-Jan-17 23:11:14 +, Matthew Smee
wrote:
Yeah, it'd be silly for organisations to try and standardise their environments
for services or infrastructure.
I'm somewhat in two minds there. Options to tackle operational
complexity/expense:
Option
Yeah, it'd be silly for organisations to try and standardise their environments
for services or infrastructure.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Rich Kulawiec
Sent: Thursday, 18 January 2018 4:03 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Open Souce
New bill out today as part of a larger set of broadband infrastructure
bills, the result of some of the NANOG community's conversations with House
staffers (and likely other 3rd parties influence):
H.R. , “Promoting Exchanges for Enhanced Routing of Information So
Networks are Great (PEERING)
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:28:13AM -0600, Colton Conor wrote:
> The goal would be to have a universal network operating system that
> runs across a variety of devices.
And for certain uses, that would be handy.
Of course it would also be handy to an attacker who found or purchased
or was given
> Is there anything that can do it all today?
VyOS, maybe. You'd have a fun time getting it working across the full set of
hardware you're thinking of though
There's AT's dNOS effort[1], though I think that wasn't really targeting
CPE so much as DC and carrier type WAN gear. A single platform for DC,
aggregation, and other SP roles is already pretty ambitious. Adding CPE
into the mix as well is another big stretch even beyond that.
It's also
Hey,
Have a look at a similar thread from recently:
http://seclists.org/nanog/2018/Jan/180
/Ruairi
On 17 January 2018 at 14:28, Colton Conor wrote:
> If one were to deploy whitebox switches, X86 servers, low cost ARM and
> MIBPS CPE devices, and basically anything that
If one were to deploy whitebox switches, X86 servers, low cost ARM and
MIBPS CPE devices, and basically anything that can run linux today, what
network operating system would you recommend? The goal would be to have a
universal network operating system that runs across a variety of devices.
>From
On 2018-01-13 03:26, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:20 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:28:19 -0500, William Herrin said:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Dale W. Carder wrote:
Traceroute or any other path diagnostics comes
11 matches
Mail list logo