Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems

2018-01-17 Thread Grant Taylor via NANOG
#Devil'sAdvocate On 01/17/2018 07:28 AM, Colton Conor wrote: If one were to deploy whitebox switches, X86 servers, low cost ARM and MIBPS CPE devices, and basically anything that can run linux today, what network operating system would you recommend? Linux. I fail to see the need for

Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems

2018-01-17 Thread Raymond Burkholder
On 01/17/2018 07:48 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote: On Wed 2018-Jan-17 23:11:14 +, Matthew Smee wrote: Yeah, it'd be silly for organisations to try and standardise their environments for services or infrastructure. Was this spoken tongue-in-check, or in all

Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems

2018-01-17 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Wed 2018-Jan-17 23:11:14 +, Matthew Smee wrote: Yeah, it'd be silly for organisations to try and standardise their environments for services or infrastructure. I'm somewhat in two minds there. Options to tackle operational complexity/expense: Option

RE: Open Souce Network Operating Systems

2018-01-17 Thread Matthew Smee
Yeah, it'd be silly for organisations to try and standardise their environments for services or infrastructure. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Rich Kulawiec Sent: Thursday, 18 January 2018 4:03 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Open Souce

Promoting Exchanges for Enhanced Routing of Information So Networks are Great (PEERING) Act

2018-01-17 Thread Dave Temkin
New bill out today as part of a larger set of broadband infrastructure bills, the result of some of the NANOG community's conversations with House staffers (and likely other 3rd parties influence): H.R. , “Promoting Exchanges for Enhanced Routing of Information So Networks are Great (PEERING)

Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems

2018-01-17 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:28:13AM -0600, Colton Conor wrote: > The goal would be to have a universal network operating system that > runs across a variety of devices. And for certain uses, that would be handy. Of course it would also be handy to an attacker who found or purchased or was given

RE: Open Souce Network Operating Systems

2018-01-17 Thread Edwin Pers
> Is there anything that can do it all today? VyOS, maybe. You'd have a fun time getting it working across the full set of hardware you're thinking of though

Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems

2018-01-17 Thread Hugo Slabbert
There's AT's dNOS effort[1], though I think that wasn't really targeting CPE so much as DC and carrier type WAN gear. A single platform for DC, aggregation, and other SP roles is already pretty ambitious. Adding CPE into the mix as well is another big stretch even beyond that. It's also

Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems

2018-01-17 Thread Ruairi Carroll
Hey, Have a look at a similar thread from recently: http://seclists.org/nanog/2018/Jan/180 /Ruairi On 17 January 2018 at 14:28, Colton Conor wrote: > If one were to deploy whitebox switches, X86 servers, low cost ARM and > MIBPS CPE devices, and basically anything that

Open Souce Network Operating Systems

2018-01-17 Thread Colton Conor
If one were to deploy whitebox switches, X86 servers, low cost ARM and MIBPS CPE devices, and basically anything that can run linux today, what network operating system would you recommend? The goal would be to have a universal network operating system that runs across a variety of devices. >From

Re: Blockchain and Networking

2018-01-17 Thread Fredrik Korsbäck
On 2018-01-13 03:26, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:20 PM, wrote: On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:28:19 -0500, William Herrin said: On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Dale W. Carder wrote: Traceroute or any other path diagnostics comes