Maybe he’s hoping there’s an off chance that someone from psychz.net is
subscribed and listening. After all they run a network and this is an
operational mailing list.
at 10:54 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
Why are you telling us here on Nanog?
-mel
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:55 PM Dan Hollis wrote:
> I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing so.
>
>
it's totally possible that the person who 'runs' the abuse@ is not the
person that 'runs' the mail system at the places in question.
the larger the organization the ce
On 25/07/2018 05:37, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
> Exactly, getting the right and updated info is so tricky that people only
> filter Private+Reserved ASNs. Because of the same reason more than 600
> unallocated ASNs are in the routing table as per the CIDR-Report.
>
> Wouldn't that be simple to parse th
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
> --- valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
>
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 00:43:35 +0200, Niels Bakker said:
> > Fine as a personal exercise, of course. The inability to download
> > modules seems sadistic to me, though.
>
--- valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 00:43:35 +0200, Niels Bakker said:
> Fine as a personal exercise, of course. The inability to download
> modules seems sadistic to me, though.
And given the adage "Never create a rule you can't enforce", I
wo
Why are you telling us here on Nanog?
-mel
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:43 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
> In article you write:
>> I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing so.
>
> See Canute, King.
>
> R's,
> John
Was out. Late reply...
--- niels=na...@bakker.net wrote:
From: Niels Bakker
* sur...@mauigateway.com (Scott Weeks) [Sat 21 Jul 2018, 22:38 CEST]:
>I had already done this in PERL, but, even though we have PERL, we
>are not allowed to download modules here. So, I'm redoing it in
>Expect. I
Hi Bill,
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 at 23:03 William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:24 AM, Aftab Siddiqui
> wrote:
> > Q - Generally, Private or Reserved ASNs are considered as Bogon ASN but
> > what about unallocated ASNs?
>
> Hi Aftab,
>
> You can reasonably think of a bogon as any Intern
In article you write:
>I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing so.
See Canute, King.
R's,
John
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 at 06:12 Radu-Adrian Feurdean <
na...@radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, at 13:24, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
> > Q - Generally, Private or Reserved ASNs are considered as Bogon ASN but
> > what about unallocated ASNs?
>
> If you don't have an automated up
I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing so.
-Dan
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Mel Beckman wrote:
Dan,
Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your complaint
is.
-mel via cell
On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24
I bet you can search the nanog list archive and find this very discussion
topic surface about ever 8-12 months...
folk always fall in this trap (or a form of it):
"Welp, we've had 1 too many people in $CORP get infected via email, spam
filter all the things!!!"
... wait...
"Oh, yea duh.. ou
Seemed pretty clear to me. He sent an abuse report to ab...@psychz.net and
it was rejected as spam.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 8:11 PM Mel Beckman wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your
> complaint is.
>
> -mel via cell
>
> > On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 P
Dan,
Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your complaint
is.
-mel via cell
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
>> can we please just stop this nonsense?
>>
>> ip under your direct
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> can we please just stop this nonsense?
>
> ip under your direct control originates sewage. you should accept reports
> as-is.
>
> requiring victims of your sewage to go through special contortions to
> report it to you is not accep
can we please just stop this nonsense?
ip under your direct control originates sewage. you should accept reports as-is.
requiring victims of your sewage to go through special contortions to
report it to you is not acceptable.
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
radar.qrator.net serves as a complementary view to bgp.he.net and AS205869
does show as peered with AS6939 there.
Jason
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 3:02 PM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
>
> In message <20180724.090316.47077931.sth...@nethelp.no>,
> sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>
> >All prefixes still vi
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, at 13:24, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
> Q - Generally, Private or Reserved ASNs are considered as Bogon ASN but
> what about unallocated ASNs?
If you don't have an automated update process running at decent time intervals
(one week or more often, under no circumstance less than on
In message <20180724.090316.47077931.sth...@nethelp.no>,
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>All prefixes still visible here (Oslo, Norway), through HE. Here's your
>original table augmented with the AS paths I see on our border routers:
>
>ASN RouteAS path
>
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:36:21PM +0530, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your advice. I was aware of IXP Manager and there
> were certain issues we faced due to which we couldn't use it when we
> tried last time (which was a few months ago before the latest stable
> release). I wish to re-
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Ramy Hashish wrote:
> I am planning to build up a security team of fresh engineers whom are
> "network oriented", any advice on the knowledge resources we can start
> with?
To add to the academic programs -
CU Boulder has an excellent telecom program f
>> It's curious phenomena where we are very willing to ignore all the
>> data points that disagree with us, and accept the one data point that
>> agrees with us, even when admitted to be fabrication.
> Some people just always prefer to do the opposite of everyone else,
> and/or the obvious. I have
Hi Tim & Job
Thanks a lot for your advice. I was aware of IXP Manager and there were
certain issues we faced due to which we couldn't use it when we tried last
time (which was a few months ago before the latest stable release). I wish
to re-visit and keep on re-visiting it until we can make it wo
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Ramy Hashish wrote:
> I am planning to build up a security team of fresh engineers whom are
> "network oriented", any advice on the knowledge resources we can start
> with?
1. Start with one or more engineers who aren't "fresh". This is more
expensive, p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To add to Suresh's list, Iowa State University (iastate.edu) offers a
graduate major program and an undergraduate minor program in cyber
security (a.k.a. Information Assurance). They also run an annual
cyber defense competition (ISEAGE).
On 7/24/20
If the Intertubes are going to all be under water in 15 years, then we need
a new cartoon from the New Yorker. I suggest this:
On the Internet nobody knows you are a phish
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 5:01 PM
To: William
How often does someone ask you for a breakfast sandwich? 😀
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:19 PM Bob Evans
wrote:
> How much ocean water displacement is taking place in Hawaii as a result of
> eruptions? How about volcanoes we don't know about deep in the ocean?
>
> In the last 5 years, California go
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:24 AM, Aftab Siddiqui
wrote:
> Q - Generally, Private or Reserved ASNs are considered as Bogon ASN but
> what about unallocated ASNs?
Hi Aftab,
You can reasonably think of a bogon as any Internet number resource
which according to the registration authority should not a
>> Dead for me via:
>> HE
>> NTT
>> COX
>
> Likewise here, via a bunch of other transits. I saw them from HE this morning
> but they appear to have been withdrawn now.
Also gone from HE from my vantage point in Oslo, Norway.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
> Dead for me via:
> HE
> NTT
> COX
Likewise here, via a bunch of other transits. I saw them from HE this morning
but they appear to have been withdrawn now.
Dead for me via:
HE
NTT
COX
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 3:03 AM, wrote:
> > I'd greatly appreciate it if readers of this post would help me to to
> confirm
> > that the non-routing of the above block is both universal and complete...
> > as it is, at least, from where I am sitting... but at this p
Hi Everyone,
Just wanted to understand something about Bogons.
As per RFC3871 - A "Bogon" (plural: "bogons") is a packet with an IP source
address in an address block not yet allocated by IANA or the Regional
Internet Registries (ARIN, RIPE, APNIC...) as well as all addresses
reserved for private
My guessing, it is rather a proof than a cause. Apple wanted to push their
dev to see more ipv6 traffic with HE algorithm before working with IPv6 only
-based on their assumption that the throughput may be better over IPv6 and with
better V6 implementation eventually they are not going to
Not a MOOC. But several schools now have graduate programs in security. Off
the top of my head, Georgia Tech, UAB, GMU ..
They might offer some shorter courses as well, for working professionals.
Take a look.
From: Ramy Hashish
Date: Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 2:33 PM
To: "Compton, Ric
Thank you Christopher, Compton and Suresh, that was helpful.
I am still looking for more.
Does anyone want to recommend any MOOC?
Thanks,
Ramy
On 23 July 2018 at 17:30, Compton, Rich A wrote:
> Barry Greene's site has some good info on ISP security as well:
> http://www.senki.org
>
> On 7/2
> I'd greatly appreciate it if readers of this post would help me to to confirm
> that the non-routing of the above block is both universal and complete...
> as it is, at least, from where I am sitting... but at this point I have
> nothing and nobody to rail against. (Or so I thought! But while w
36 matches
Mail list logo
