Re: trace from behind tata noam

On 06/12/2018 01:19, Randy Bush wrote: a host in as4128, 198.180.152.15, is having problems getting to stuff behind as6453 (tata). so i try to get an atlas traceroute toward 198.180.152.15 from as6453. but atlas whines Probes selection: Your selected ASN is not covered by our network so

trace from behind tata noam

a host in as4128, 198.180.152.15, is having problems getting to stuff behind as6453 (tata). so i try to get an atlas traceroute toward 198.180.152.15 from as6453. but atlas whines Probes selection: Your selected ASN is not covered by our network so not even one measly probe. if anyone

Re: Monitoring service that has a human component?

For my 9-5 we have a company that has a 24/7 NOC that watches all of our boxes. They CEO is in the US and the NOC guys are seas. They are generally very responsive. It's very affordable (about $200.00 per box per month). These guys work real well but they are sort of work in the Box. We need to

Re: Monitoring service that has a human component?

Whats your budget? The outsourced NOC firms tend to be expensive (I've looked at them for a project), and they are also not that fast, so dont expect someone to determine if an alarm is valid within a few minutes, instead, in goes into their queue and waits for a tech to pick it up, so it

Re: Monitoring service that has a human component?

> On Dec 5, 2018, at 5:01 PM, David H wrote: > > Hey all, was curious if anyone knows of a website monitoring service that has > the option to incorporate a human component into the decision and escalation > tree? I’m trying to help a customer find a way around false positives > bogging

Monitoring service that has a human component?

Hey all, was curious if anyone knows of a website monitoring service that has the option to incorporate a human component into the decision and escalation tree? I’m trying to help a customer find a way around false positives bogging down their NOC staff, by having a human determine the

Re: L3 Network topology in YANG

Hi Yannis, I know that there are some folks using pyangbind with models that correspond to topology including rfc8346, similarly, some folks are using goyang +ygot (where using Go) for dealing with their topology models in

Re: Network Atlas End of Year 2018 Update

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:37 PM Mehmet Akcin wrote: > Hi Majdi, > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:12 PM Majdi S. Abbas wrote: > >> >> > https://www.networkatlas.org/blog/eoy2018 >> >> >> Hey Mehmet, >> >> Thanks for putting together this resource for the community. >> >> Can

Re: Network Atlas End of Year 2018 Update

Hi Majdi, On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:12 PM Majdi S. Abbas wrote: > > > https://www.networkatlas.org/blog/eoy2018 > > > Hey Mehmet, > > Thanks for putting together this resource for the community. > > Can you expand on some of these line items? I'm at a bit of a > loss as

Re: Network Atlas End of Year 2018 Update

On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 05:31:48PM -0800, Mehmet Akcin wrote: > Next up, let me address the elephant in the room. As many of you know, > Network Atlas’ Kickstarter for $100K for 2019 funding came up short of > meeting its goal(we cancelled it before the time because many of you > reached out

used hardware reseller

Hi there I am looking to buy juniper qfx and some dwdm gear to be shipped overseas (indonesia, thailand, colombia, chile...) I am looking to see if therr are any preferred hardware resellers people would recommend? If you know a way to buy local that would be fantastic otherwise shipping it is