There’s also this gem from 2005 or 2007 days. I’ve heard Cisco staff was
involved in its creation.
http://www.mattzrelak.com/mp3/t1down.htm
—Chris
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 8:14 AM, Ca By wrote:
>
> See below for high value of the list, both items are very pleasing
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at
Shoot an email to ipad...@centurylink.com and we'll give you a hand. If you are
an active customer with valid circuit ID getting help from the NOC on this
should be a solution they know how to provide, if you have reached the correct
center. Folks that are not or have left behind old entries
On 9/5/19 2:05 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> I was doing some IRR clean-up and after a few successful updates, I'm no
> longer able to alter or delete our objects in rr.level3.com.
>
> Emails to r...@level3.com result in no action and no response. I've tried
> reaching out to the Level3 (Centurylink)
Oddly enough, I created a Z Org for legacy resources and got hit up on
linked-in by IPv4 brokers as well as some spam from Cogent.
Annoying.
> On Aug 4, 2019, at 09:29, Tim Burke wrote:
>
> Done, Sir. Thanks.
>
> Tim Burke
> t...@burke.us
>
>> On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, at 10:42 PM, John Curran
Many others have already recommended these, but I suggest installing test
VMs of both phpipam and nipap and seeing which works best for your use
case.
NIPAP has fairly extensive tools supporting automation for provisioning.
phpipam has a few additional functions on top of only ip address
I was doing some IRR clean-up and after a few successful updates, I'm no
longer able to alter or delete our objects in rr.level3.com.
Emails to r...@level3.com result in no action and no response. I've tried
reaching out to the Level3 (Centurylink) NOC via email and phone, and
can't seem to
I’ve both been exposed to newer and better tools - and been annoyed at the
noise - in NANOG for almost 2 decades now.
So far phpipam has suited our needs. However it takes quite a few clicks to
get things done, and anytime you can remove friction you have an opportunity
for a better product.
I wish Digital Ocean would put as much effort into policing their network; at
least two thirds of the malicious traffic hitting our customers comes from an
even split between them and OVH.
From: NANOG on behalf of Mel Beckman
Date: Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 10:48 AM
To: Phillip Carroll
I highly recommend Netbox. We use it for our Source of Truth.
From: NANOG on behalf of Mehmet Akcin
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 3:52:09 AM
To: Nuno Vieira
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
I forgot to mention
Check phpipam
[ https://phpipam.net/ | https://phpipam.net/ ]
From: "Mehmet Akcin"
To: "North American Network Operators' Group"
Sent: Thursday, 5 September, 2019 09:35:19
Subject: IPAM recommendations
Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus (almost
Thanks for confirming. This is exactly what I think.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 23:47 Mel Beckman wrote:
> I agree with Phil, Netbox is a great opens source IPAM project. We
> currently use ManageEngine, but I plan to switch to Netbox when our current
> license is up for renewal. NetBox. The
I agree with Phil, Netbox is a great opens source IPAM project. We currently
use ManageEngine, but I plan to switch to Netbox when our current license is up
for renewal. NetBox. The project is supported by Digital Ocean, which is the
kind of corporate sponsorship that keeps open source project
On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 21:20:19 +0900, Mehmet Akcin said:
> I was using another product till few days ago (i won’t mention name) i am
> not happy and decided to go with something open source
Can you mention why you're unhappy with the product? Price, a critical
feature that was lacking, something
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Andrew
Latham
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 8:20 AM
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: IPAM recommendations
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Please check the mailing list archives as a resource. I made a short list last
time
Please check the mailing list archives as a resource. I made a short list
last time https://lathama.net/DCIM which looks to be June 20th 2018
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:37 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must, almost..).
See below for high value of the list, both items are very pleasing
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:10 AM Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On 05/09/2019 08:09, Kasper Adel wrote:
>
> No. This is art & tech from 12 years ago:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y36fG2Oba0
>
> -Hank
>
> In SPRING a time when
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 2:58 AM Todd Underwood wrote:
>
> that's unkind and is taking advantage of the attention and goodwill of
> the community here. this is becoming a pattern.
>
+1 on this noisy pattern. Hire an consultant to google these things for
you.
>
On 05/09/2019 08:09, Kasper Adel wrote:
No. This is art & tech from 12 years ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y36fG2Oba0
-Hank
In SPRING a time when segment and routing had no mismatch, a time when
isis and ospf ate a forbidden encap, all they had to do was forward
bgp like its hot,
* m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) [Thu 05 Sep 2019, 14:17 CEST]:
I don’t think this is a reasonable understanding of Nanog. Nanog
members ask each other for operational tool recommendations all the
time, and since these products are right up the alley of Nanog’s
mission — network operations —
phpIPAM
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 03:36, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
>
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must,
Lets focus on the technology. Netbox is solid. I am leaning towards this
since its open source and there is some librenms integration.
I was using another product till few days ago (i won’t mention name) i am
not happy and decided to go with something open source
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 21:16 Mel
Todd,
I don’t think this is a reasonable understanding of Nanog. Nanog members ask
each other for operational tool recommendations all the time, and since these
products are right up the alley of Nanog’s mission — network operations — it’s
a perfectly reasonable use of Nanog.
But you read a
i don't think that this is a reasonable use of nanog. if you have research
to present and then a question to ask, that's totally great. this is
especially true if you can add evaluative criteria and information before
asking questions from people who have relevant experience.
you read a single
I forgot to mention Netbox https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox
integration (of some kind ) with LibreNMS is plus
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:51 PM Nuno Vieira wrote:
> Check phpipam
>
> https://phpipam.net/
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Mehmet Akcin"
> *To: *"North
Not much beyond this,
https://appuals.com/the-5-best-ip-address-management-ipam-software/
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:39 PM Todd Underwood wrote:
> What have you evaluated so far? Can you share your evaluation grid, how
> you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific
>
What have you evaluated so far? Can you share your evaluation grid, how
you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific
interesting findings so far?
Thanks!
t
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:37 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open
Subject: IPAM recommendations Date: Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:35:19PM +0900
Quoting Mehmet Akcin (meh...@akcin.net):
> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must, almost..). 40-50K IPs to be managed.
nipap
infoblox if you are an enterprise needing AD
Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
(almost must, almost..). 40-50K IPs to be managed.
thanks in advance.
28 matches
Mail list logo
