Re: FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service

2020-11-02 Thread Eric Kuhnke
The press release doesn't reference at all, but Aeronet (the largest WISP in Puerto Rico, and an operator of gigabit class service in MDUs) has been testing Facebook/Terragraph 802.11ay 60 GHz based, point to multipoint last mile stuff for a while now. Very short range, high speed, high capacity.

PeeringDB Satisfaction Survey open now til November 20th

2020-11-02 Thread Steve McManus
PeeringDB is a non-profit, freely available, user-maintained, database of networks, and the go-to location for interconnection data. The database facilitates the global interconnection of networks at Internet Exchange Points (IXPs), data centers, and other interconnection facilities, and is the

Re: Youtube TV Location error. Google Confirms issue but can't fix.

2020-11-02 Thread Josh Luthman
Did you try this? https://support.google.com/websearch/workflow/9308722 Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:01 PM Nate Burke wrote: > Anyone here from the Youtube TV side of Google? I've had a

RSS Feed for this list?

2020-11-02 Thread Timothy Brown
Hi, I noticed that now the old gossamer-threads.com archives of the NANOG mailing list are redirecting to a hosting company or MSP. I used to consume these archives via RSS as it was a little easier for me than grinding through a NANOG folder. Is there any extant RSS feed for the NANOG list?

Youtube TV Location error. Google Confirms issue but can't fix.

2020-11-02 Thread Nate Burke
Anyone here from the Youtube TV side of Google?   I've had a ticket open for 2 months on one of my /24 subnets getting the wrong City location.  Every ticket reply from Google confirms that they see the incorrect location, They reference that it is part of a larger geo-location problem with

Re: Newbie Questions: How-to remove spurious IRR records (and keep them out for good)?

2020-11-02 Thread Job Snijders
Dear Pirawat, On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 08:13:19PM +0700, Pirawat WATANAPONGSE wrote: > I am seeking advice concerning someone else announcing IRR records on > resources belonging to me. Change is underway in the IRR ecosystem! The situation we are all used to is that it is rather cumbersome to

Re: Newbie Questions: How-to remove spurious IRR records (and keep them out for good)?

2020-11-02 Thread Brandon Martin
On 10/30/20 9:26 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > 1 - You should worry a little, but not much. Filters allowing unwanted > announcements might be created using these erroneous IRR records, but > they won't do any damage by themselves. An actual wrong BGP > announcement is required for any damage to

Re: FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service

2020-11-02 Thread Jorge Santiago
No WISP's just the local CLEC and cable company. Given the terrain in PR a wireless delivery application might suit best. On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:23 AM Sean Donelan wrote: > > FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband > Service As A Result Of Uniendo A Puerto

Re: FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service

2020-11-02 Thread Shane Ronan
I would guess the dollar numbers represent the amount that they are receiving in incentives and not the total cost of construction. Shane On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:58 AM Brandon Svec wrote: > Maybe it *is* for wireless. That would be more likely with those numbers, > but still quite

Mellanox / Cumulus

2020-11-02 Thread Bryan Holloway
Curious to hear if the community has had any real-world experience using Mellanox/Cumulus (nVidia) for L2/L3 things outside of the datacenter. Like other vendors, notably Arista, they seem to be trying to move out of the datacenter and target SPs and the layer 3 market. Personally, I think

Re: FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service

2020-11-02 Thread Brandon Svec
Maybe it is for wireless. That would be more likely with those numbers, but still quite unbelievable. My company does low voltage cabling. We charge more than $100 per drop to provide CAT6 in a newly constructed office building. It would be impossible to provide wires to 1.2 million locations

Re: FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service

2020-11-02 Thread j k
Skeptical about the timing and scoping of the project. Joe Klein "inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene 1) "*I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been." -- *Wayne Gretzky "I never lose. I either win or learn" - Nelson Mandela On Mon,

Re: FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service

2020-11-02 Thread Shane Ronan
Seems you could do something with Wireless much easier, guaranteeing access to speed of +/- 300mbits by using the CBAND spectrum that is coming available. Why run wires to the home at all? On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:22 AM Sean Donelan wrote: > > FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To

Re: FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service

2020-11-02 Thread Brandon Svec
This seems like very good news. I am quite skeptical this can be accomplished per the provided numbers though. > On Nov 2, 2020, at 8:24 AM, Sean Donelan wrote: > > $127.1 million in funding over 10 years covering more than 1.2 million > locations

Re: Asus wifi AP re-writing DNS packets

2020-11-02 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Hi Alarig I tried that but somehow DNS traffic still does not work. I tried adding rules in prerouting as well and still no impact. anurag@RT-AC58U:/tmp/home/root# iptables -t nat -L PREROUTING -v -n Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 25 packets, 3147 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in

FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service

2020-11-02 Thread Sean Donelan
FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service As A Result Of Uniendo A Puerto Rico Fund Nearly a Third of Locations Will Get Speeds of At Least 1 Gbps with All Other Locations Getting Speeds of At Least 100 Mbps

Re: att or sonic "residential" fiber service at a "nontraditional" residence.

2020-11-02 Thread Scott McGrath
I’d say ‘it depends’ on the sales organization being willing to sell it. The non-profit also has to realize that they get the same service restoration speeds and customer support that a residential customer gets. On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 8:24 PM Mark Seiden wrote: > att 1Gb/sec symmetric fiber

Re: 100G over 100 km of dark fiber

2020-11-02 Thread Ariën Vijn via NANOG
Hi Jared, 4x25Gbit/s, 'directly detected' MAY work but it won't be easy at all. As many already have suggested, coherent detection will give you much much less headaches. If you want to go with directly detected for financial reasons than first make sure you know the type(s) of fibers and

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

2020-11-02 Thread Karl Auerbach
Let me jump in and add a bit more information. I am not an RF guy - I stopped playing with radios [and TV] in the days when they used vacuum tubes (yes, really.) Many laptops share radio and antenna resources between WiFi and bluetooth. Bluetooth lives on the 2.4ghz band.  Wifi presently

Brazil Transit

2020-11-02 Thread Rod Beck
Hey Folks, I would be interested in understanding 100 GigE transit pricing in Sao Paulo. If you have any insight, contact me off line. Thanks. Regards, Roderick. Roderick Beck VP of Business Development United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com

Re: plea for comcast/sprint handoff debug help

2020-11-02 Thread Job Snijders
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: > On the other hand, the fallback exposes a Malicious-in-the-Middle > replay attack surface for 100% of the prefixes published using RRDP, > 100% of the time. This allows attackers to prevent changes in ROAs to > be seen. This is a

Re: plea for comcast/sprint handoff debug help

2020-11-02 Thread Tim Bruijnzeels
Hi Randy, all, > On 31 Oct 2020, at 04:55, Randy Bush wrote: > >> If there is a covering less specific ROA issued by a parent, this will >> then result in RPKI invalid routes. > > i.e. the upstream kills the customer. not a wise business model. I did not say it was. But this is the