Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

Owen - Correct - ARIN will not allow you to bring non-legacy resources under an LRSA agreement. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers > On 4 Dec 2021, at 9:59 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > I would be more than happy to consilolidate my

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

I would be more than happy to consilolidate my ipv6 addresses under my lrsa, but ARIN will not allow it. Owen > On Dec 4, 2021, at 17:43, John Curran wrote: > >  Yes Owen, that is correct… > > If an organization insists on maintaining multiple contractual relationships > with ARIN (for

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

Yes Owen, that is correct… If an organization insists on maintaining multiple contractual relationships with ARIN (for whatever reason) then they will be billed for each relation separately - and that is indeed likely to be more than having a single consolidated agreement for all number

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

> On Dec 4, 2021, at 8:59 AM, John Curran wrote: > > Just for clarity - ARIN’s fee schedule is such that ISP customers (i.e. those > with registration service plans) pay an annual services fee based on their > higher category of IPv4 or IPv6 resources – i.e. those with IPv4 resources > can

Re: .bv ccTLD

Jaap Akkerhuis wrote on 04/12/2021 21:13: Similar ideas where held for MD and TM but didn'y seem to work out. Furthermore, an indepent Bougainville mighs change the name to something else (as Zimbabwe did). this is not unusual: .tp became one of the shortest-lived cctlds, and was dropped in

Re: .bv ccTLD

"John Levine" writes: > It appears that Jay R. Ashworth said: > >Well, sure, but with the copper deposit measured in double-digit billions, > >it seems sane to assume they've got a plan there... > > It's been 30 years. We can hope but I wouldn't hold my breath. > > >Though given .TV's

Re: .bv ccTLD

It does seem like the rest of the story to me. If the government said no, then that is pretty much it, that is the end of the story regardless of what reason given. (Assuming that it was done correctly and that laws regarding it don't change that is) -Cynthia On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 5:35 PM Jay

Re: .bv ccTLD

On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 5:03 PM Carsten Bormann wrote: > > On 2021-12-04, at 16:18, Cynthia Revström via NANOG wrote: > > > > I think pretty much all codes ending in an X is because there were no > > better ones available. (I am not certain on this part though) > > I don’t think the Mexicans

Re: .bv ccTLD

It appears that Jay R. Ashworth said: >Well, sure, but with the copper deposit measured in double-digit billions, >it seems sane to assume they've got a plan there... It's been 30 years. We can hope but I wouldn't hold my breath. >Though given .TV's benefits to Tuvalu, and the number of

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

Just for clarity - ARIN’s fee schedule is such that ISP customers (i.e. those with registration service plans) pay an annual services fee based on their higher category of IPv4 or IPv6 resources – i.e. those with IPv4 resources can obtain a corresponding size of IPv6 resources without any

Re: .bv ccTLD

- Original Message - > From: "Bjørn Mork" > The rest of the story is here: > https://www.norid.no/en/aktuelt/plans-to-utilize-bv-shelved-en/ Sadly, that's not really The Rest... Of The Story. Sounds like the government regulator nixed it, giving *no reason at all*. Cheers, -- jra --

Re: .bv ccTLD

On 04/12/2021 00:45, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: My favorite youtuber has just pointed out that Bougainville will separate formally from Papua New Guinea in 2027, which, surprisingly, is only 5 or 6 years from now. So I looked up .bv, and of course... it's assigned to Bouvet Island, an uninhabited

Re: .bv ccTLD

Jaap Akkerhuis writes: > SIDN and NORID once considered to market .BV together: > The rest of the story is here: https://www.norid.no/en/aktuelt/plans-to-utilize-bv-shelved-en/ Bjørn

Re: .bv ccTLD

On 2021-12-04, at 16:18, Cynthia Revström via NANOG wrote: > > I think pretty much all codes ending in an X is because there were no > better ones available. (I am not certain on this part though) I don’t think the Mexicans would agree :-) .bx (Benelux) is reserved only, but it is another

Re: .bv ccTLD

- Original Message - > From: "Jaap Akkerhuis" > It is no makred as reserved but assigned. So this sentence in the wikipedia article: "The domain remains reserved for potential future use. " speaks from the viewpoint of NORID, not of the MA. Got it. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth

Re: .bv ccTLD

Oh dear. They actually gave them .SS? Wow. On December 4, 2021 10:18:26 AM EST, "Cynthia Revström" wrote: >Hi, > >Not only is the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code assigned but the ccTLD is >delegated to NORID's nameservers. >NORID also makes it pretty clear that they are not interested in >selling the

Re: .bv ccTLD

Hi, Not only is the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code assigned but the ccTLD is delegated to NORID's nameservers. NORID also makes it pretty clear that they are not interested in selling the TLD, and I suspect that might very well mirror the position of the Norwegian government. While something like

RE: private 5G networks?

Maybe the main argument is: run a Pegasus free 5g/lte network. Mr. Besos was hack by that and it's probably a technical way to start protecting customers against that kind of sophisticated spywares that spread in the normal mobile network. I might be wrong and probably Pegasus can still

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

> On Dec 3, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Edvinas Kairys wrote: > > Hello, > > We're setting up IPv6 network is USA. Our company has branches and different > legal entities in EU and US. We've some ipv6 PI subnets already allocated by > RIPE for EU datacenters. I have few questions: > > 1) Is it

Re: .bv ccTLD

"Jay R. Ashworth" writes: > - Original Message - > > From: "David Conrad" > > > Jay, > > > > On Dec 3, 2021, at 4:46 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > >> In general I could I understand that, but it is my understanding that the > >> domain > >> is still marked reserved at the

Re: .bv ccTLD

David Conrad writes: > Jay, > > On Dec 3, 2021, at 4:46 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > In general I could I understand that, but it is my understanding that = > the domain is still marked reserved at the Secretariat, > > Sorry, which secretariat? I'm curious about that secretariat as well.

Re: .bv ccTLD

Sabri Berisha writes: > - On Dec 3, 2021, at 2:45 PM, Jay R. Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > NORID might try to make a case that BV is the common corporate abbreviation > > in their political subdivision... > > Same for .nl. Most people on this list will be familiar