On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 21:45, Josh Luthman
wrote:
Can you have an ethernet switch with dying gasp?
> Our ONTs (Calix, PON) have it but I don't see how you'd do it with
> ethernet.
>
At least via efm-oam you can have a dying gasp.
You could probably add it to autonegotiation, by sending some
> On Nov 27, 2023, at 11:45, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>
> That’s exactly what I did. I was able to get a 3/4 conduit from my furnace
> room/network closet to the exterior of my home where utilities enter. It took
> some doing but I got it in, terminated in a NEMA box.
Why would 1” be
ACX7100-48L
…or…
ACX7100-32C
?
Aaron
> On Nov 27, 2023, at 3:59 PM, Edwin Mallette wrote:
>
>
> In attempting to operationalize the ACX7100 I have run into quite a few
> challenges with the platform once I stray outside of traditional routing and
> switching. The EVPN instances seem to
In attempting to operationalize the ACX7100 I have run into quite a few
challenges with the platform once I stray outside of traditional routing
and switching. The EVPN instances seem to have quite a few caveats and
things like CFM and RFC2544 traffic generation. Many of the show commands
don't
That’s exactly what I did. I was able to get a 3/4 conduit from my furnace
room/network closet to the exterior of my home where utilities enter. It took
some doing but I got it in, terminated in a NEMA box.
When we got fiber a few years ago, the installer told me it was the easiest
install
Can you have an ethernet switch with dying gasp?
Our ONTs (Calix, PON) have it but I don't see how you'd do it with ethernet.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:25 AM Tom Samplonius wrote:
>
> Adva, RAD, and Telco Systems are all good NID options.
>
> You can go with just any switch, but “proper”
On 11/27/2023 09:12, Josh Luthman wrote:
If I was building a house I'd just get some 1" conduit from the outside
to the inside. Put it in a NEMA box. That solves the problem forever.
1" is great if you can get it, and I'd try to argue for it. I'd settle
for 3/4"
Builders and resi
> On Nov 21, 2023, at 7:42 AM, Dale W. Carder wrote:
>
> Thus spake Tom Samplonius (t...@samplonius.org) on Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at
> 07:02:52PM -0800:
>>> On Nov 17, 2023, at 6:58 AM, Christopher Morrow
>>> wrote:
>>> IRR filters provide control over whom is provided reachability through
>>>
Adva, RAD, and Telco Systems are all good NID options.
You can go with just any switch, but “proper” NIDs have dying gasp. If the
NID is going on a customer premise, I consider dying gasp a must. The dying
gasp allows your NOC to determine the difference between a network break and
For those carriers that do not mind, they have already accepted the cost that
comes to a truck roll and may pass the cost onto the customer depending on the
result. Where as there are a number of carriers like Cogent, Colt, Comcast,
Cox, Crown Castle, Lumen, Zayo, are capable of testing the
Around here, Spectrum uses an Adva for demarc and it can not do rfc2544
testing. They will unplug the Adva and plug in the techs' mobile unit
(Viavi I think). VZW/Tmo/Sprint/etc don't seem to mind.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 9:34 AM Ryan Hamel wrote:
> The problem with using switches as a CPE
The problem with using switches as a CPE device is the lack of RFC2544 (or
equivalent) testing, and monitoring of the complete circuit with TWAMP. Both of
which are used to ensure compliance with an SLA.
Ryan Hamel
From: NANOG on behalf of Josh
Luthman
Sent:
When you say fiber, is it Ethernet? If you just want layer 2 and a media
converter, Mikrotik is a super good answer.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:19 AM Christopher Hawker
wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> I've found these Mikrotik devices to be excellent and reliable:
>
> CRS310-8G+2S+IN: 8 x 2.5G copper
If I was building a house I'd just get some 1" conduit from the outside to
the inside. Put it in a NEMA box. That solves the problem forever.
As a fiber ISP, and assuming you're doing your own WiFi in the house, you
can do conduit inside or we can just run the fiber. We don't want to run
14 matches
Mail list logo
