On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:56:44 -0800, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:30 PM,
Anthony Roberts na...@arbitraryconstant.com wrote:
It has been my experience that when you give someone a huge address
space
to play with (eg 10/8), they start doing things like using bits
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:08:44 +1030, Matthew Moyle-Croft
m...@internode.com.au wrote:
Let's face it - the current v6 assignment rules are to solve a 1990s set
of problems. A /64 isn't needed now that we have DHCP(v6).
It's needed to prevent people from NATing in v6, as they'll still want
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:41:01 +1030, Matthew Moyle-Croft
m...@internode.com.au wrote:
And ARP tables are propogated around networks? No, they're local to a
router.
I don't think there's any need for the ISP's routers to advertise all the
prefixes they delegate. They'll advertise the /48 or
Let's face it - they're going to have to come up with much more creative
$200/hour chucklehead consultants to burn through that much anytime soon.
It has been my experience that when you give someone a huge address space
to play with (eg 10/8), they start doing things like using bits in the
4 matches
Mail list logo
