Re: Issues with deliverability to hotmail -- any Microsoft contacts?

questform/8ad563e3-288e-2a61-8122-3ba03d6b8d75 > > > > *From:* NANOG *On Behalf Of *Brock > Tice > *Sent:* Tuesday, 21 July 2020 4:11 am > *To:* nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* Issues with deliverability to hotmail -- any Microsoft > contacts? > > > > We have

Issues with deliverability to hotmail -- any Microsoft contacts?

We have been having issues delivering email to hotmail users again, no bulk mail, just various personal emails from a server on our network. We have signed up for SNDS, only identified one mail server of a customer on our network that was flagged as an issue, and it has been remedied, no longer sho

Technical Contact at Yahoo

Yahoo have done a very good job of locking down their contact info. We have an issue where they seem to be blocking one of our CGN public addresses. Does anyone know how I can get in touch with an appropriate person there?

Technical Contact at Yahoo

Yahoo have done a very good job of locking down their contact info. We have an issue where they seem to be blocking one of our CGN public addresses. Does anyone know how I can get in touch with an appropriate person there?

Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE

On 10/11/2018 09:39 PM, Tom Ammon wrote: > What did you experience with the dual-stack/CGN approach that keeps you > from recommending it? Nothing, sorry if my writing was confusing. It was the 464XLAT that I don't recommend at this time, lack of vendor support by the brands we currently use (espe

Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE

On 10/09/2018 06:24 PM, Philip Loenneker wrote: > I have asked several vendors we deal with about the newer technologies > such as 464XLAT, and have had some responses indicating they will > investigate internally, however we have not made much progress yet. One > vendor suggested their device supp

Re: Blockchain and Networking

On 1/23/2018 6:17 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote: The potential is there to go a step beyond replacing RPKI, as a blockchain could be the AS number authority itself, thus eliminating the need to have any centralized organizations for tracking and managing number resource assignments. I am a long-time f

Re: 48vDC Output UPS

On December 29, 2017 5:58:02 PM MST, "Lewis,Mitchell T." wrote: >Greetings again, >I have been looking for a Rack Mount UPS that accepts AC power input >but has 48vdc output(telco voltage). Anyone have any recommendations? > > > >Regards, > >Mitchell T. Lewis > >[ mailto:mle...@techcompute.ne

Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too

Hi Lyndon, thanks for taking the time to address my questions. Responses below. On 2017-12-28 17:57, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: >> On Dec 28, 2017, at 3:28 PM, Brock Tice wrote: >> We are currently handing out /52s to customers. Based on a reasonable >> sparse allocation scheme

Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too

On 12/28/2017 03:44 PM, James R Cutler wrote: > There is no prohibition of requesting an allocation which matches your > network. That is, simply request what is needed with suitable data for > justification and get your /40 or whatever. We are currently handing out /52s to customers. Based on a

Re: Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP

On 2017-12-28 04:11, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Thanks for sharing. It's interesting to see enterprise customers > adopting OpenWRT/LEDE despite no official support from CPE vendors for > 3rd party firmware on their products. One reason we are using Linksys so far is their nominal s

Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP

We recently deployed our first half-dozen IPv6-only customers after 6+ months of testing, using 464XLAT. It took me ages to sort all this out, so I hope someone finds this helpful. Feedback very much welcome. https://blog.brocktice.com/2017/12/27/deploying-464xlat-for-ipv6-only-clients-on-a-s

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

On 12/27/2017 04:11 PM, Jima wrote: > On 2017-12-27 15:50, William Herrin wrote: >> Net 196/8 is part of the swamp. Just speculating, but perhaps the >> original registration of 196.53.96.0/22 >> pre-dated the reassignment of 196/8 to AfriNIC? > > Maybe? This snippet from W

Subnet being blocked by Level3 due to prior owner's misuse

We have a subnet that used to belong to someone else. One of our business customers that was recently moved to that subnet is being blocked from accessing one of their supplier's web site that's hosted by Level3. Our attempts to work through the supplier to resolve the issue have not worked as the

Re: Google DNS64 misconfigured?

On 09/26/2017 11:00 PM, Joel Whitehouse wrote: > A forum topic [0] suggests this behavior might be intermittent but no > official response from google there. I have seen intermittent issues with IPv6 queries to google's nameservers as well. Some sites simply would not load, which is what caused me

Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp

We are small but we are just about out of IPv4 and aren't going to get or buy any more. We have been testing for a while. > Shall I go for IPv6-only deployment or dual stack? You should plan for adding customers eventually that are IPv6-only, unless you have all the v4 you will ever need, and you

Re: Admiral Hosting in London

On August 8, 2017 6:25:56 PM MDT, Mike Hammett wrote: >I've heard of some people that don't have the capital to purchase their >own block yet, but want PI space so they can move away from whomever is >providing their transit + IP space now. I'm sure the discussed reason >is much more prevalent, th