Fwd: [lacnog] LACNOG2022 - Call for Presentations

FYI, Come join NANOG’s kid brother from the South ! :-) This year’s event will be hybrid, so traveling shouldn’t be an issue. Cheers! /Carlos Forwarded message: From: Jorge Villa vía LACNOG To: Latin America and Caribbean Region Network Operators Group Cc: Jorge Villa Subject:

Re: DoD IP Space

That would be true if “the Internet” was still fully comprised of American providers and customers. That hasn’t been the case for a long, long time. On 26 Apr 2021, at 16:27, Mel Beckman wrote: Owen, Well, no. The Internet — meaning the ISPs and customers that comprise it — get substantial

Re: Gaming Consoles and IPv4

Delay, or “lag” in gamer parlance is everything. Have too much lag and you are dead without realizing you are dead. Lag frustrates gamers enormously and is probably one of the main drivers of NOC calls. It seems to me that a purely client/server model will inherently have more lag issues than

Fwd: [lacnog] LACNOG 2020 - Call for Presentations

Hi all, LACNOG (the Latin American and Caribbean Network Operators Group) will be a virtual meeting this year. Looking forward to great talks from our big brother NANOG members :-) /Carlos LACNOG PC Forwarded message: From: Jorge Villa To: Latin America and Caribbean Region Network

Re: No IPv6 by design to increase reliability...

It is an interesting question to ponder. It is true that IPv6 tends to be somewhat more problematic than IPv4, but these days the incidents where IPv6 becomes unavailable or has issues are rare. BTW I have had recently an issue where I had IPv4 reachability problems while IPv6 worked

Contact at SpeedTest.net

Hi all, If anyone has a contact at SpeedTest it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! /Carlos

Contacting AS6589 - "Beneficial Technologies"

Hello all, I’m trying to reach anyone at AS 6589, “Beneficial Technologies”. They are announcing large chunk of LACNIC unallocated space, as can be seen here: https://bgp.he.net/AS6589 Although I usually give people the benefit of doubt, in this case we are talking about 5 /16 prefixes.

Fwd: [lacnog] Call for Presentations – LACNOG 2017

FYI, apologies for duplicates. Forwarded message: From: Tomas Lynch To: lac...@lacnog.org Subject: [lacnog] Call for Presentations – LACNOG 2017 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:55:17 -0400 LACNOG, the Latin American and Caribbean Network Operators Group,

Re: BGP IP prefix hijacking

We use a mix of BGPMon and RPKI+RIPE Validator. On 30 Jan 2017, at 4:41, Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG wrote: > Hi All, > > I am planning to write a tool to detect real time BGP IP prefix hijacking. > I am glad to know some of the open problems faced by > providers/companies/community. > I would

Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

Or (90S,0), so they get a bit of fresh air and have some time think during the voyage :-) On 4/11/16 2:14 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Or 0,0, send the FBI to Africa on a boating trip. that would probably be > easier than "unknown" or "null". > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct:

Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement

Hello, On 12/4/2014 2:33 PM, Andrew Gallo wrote: On 12/4/2014 11:22 AM, William Herrin wrote: Understood and good point. I've heard rumblings of setting up a non-ARIN TAL, though I wonder what the value is in separating RPKI from the registry. Wouldn't this put us in the same position

Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement

Hello, On 12/4/2014 2:33 PM, Andrew Gallo wrote: On 12/4/2014 11:22 AM, William Herrin wrote: Understood and good point. I've heard rumblings of setting up a non-ARIN TAL, though I wonder what the value is in separating RPKI from the registry. Wouldn't this put us in the same position

Re: Network diagnostics for the end user

May sound silly, but in another life I faced a similar problem and by hosting local SpeedTest.net servers in our network we could fend off many of these calls. But I guess it will depend on your customers, whether they take it or not. cheers, ~Carlos On 6/20/13 9:45 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:

RPKI Support on the Juniper SRX line

Hello all, I'm working with a Juniper partner in Colombia on a possible RPKI deployment. As far as I understand Juniper's website, only the T, M and MX lines support RPKI, yet the partner insists that Junos 12.3 / 13.1 supports RPKI on the SRX line. I cannot find any document or reference

Symantec contact

Hello all, I'm looking for a PoC in Symantec who could help me with an issue in this report: http://www.symantec.com/threatreport/topic.jsp?id=namaid=nam_malicious_activity_by_geo I've already tried to contact the emails listed on the website, multiple times, to no avail. Contact me on

Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs

Please, please someone go to http://meemsy.com/videos/add/24 and create 'Hitler reacts to the fraudulent Romanian ASNs' After that we can move on. :=) ~C. On 1/16/13 2:01 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: I'll bet Hitler would have used his real name on the whois entries. There. Now I think we're

Akamai Network Contact

Hello! I'm looking for a contact in Akamai, preferably someone dwelling in the dark realm of layer 3. I've been contacted by a LACNIC member from Suriname who is having reachability issues specifically with sites hosted in Akamai. Thank you! ~Carlos

Re: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header

Just for redundancy's sake: No, L3 is **not** the place for this kind of information. L3 is supposed to be simple, easy to implement, fast to switch. In Spanish we have a very strong adjective for this kind of ideas: pésimo. I couldn't find a similar one in English without using foul words :-) In

Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

We have numbers to share. We have performed two experiments at two different events LACNIC held this year: - June in Port-Au-Prince (~110 attendees) - October in Montevideo (~400 attendees) The question was: What is the relation between IPv4 and IPv6 traffic in a fully dual-stacked network?.

LACNIC RPKI RTA key rollover

Folks, On Thursday, November 29, 2012 LACNIC will be performing a system migration to a new release of the RPKI system. We will take the opportunity to also perform a key rollover of LACNIC's RPKI trust anchor. The new TAL (trust anchor locator) file can be downloaded from [1]. Also a

Re: IPv6 only streaming video

Hello, Due to popular demand ( :=)) ), we are currently offering the streaming of the LACNIC / LACNOG event over an IP6-only channel. Take a look at http://www2.lacnic.net/sp/eventos/lacnicxviii/stream6.html The webpage will load over IPv4 but the video is IPv6-only regards ~Carlos On

Re: quietly....

I think the ship has sailed for the class E /8s. Using them will require significant effort and that effort, both time and money, is better spent on deploying IPv6. regards Carlos On 2/1/11 9:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: On Jan 31, 2011, at 10:43 PM, George Bonser wrote: 3. Busting out 16 more

Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)

Although I support Rpki as a technology, there are legitimate concerns that it could be abused. I now believe that Rpki needs work in this area at IETF level so the concerns are adressed. I imagine some form of secret sharing among different parties or sme form of key escrow. I am sure that it

Re: Level 3's IRR Database

-- -- = Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo http://www.labs.lacnic.net =

Re: quietly....

-- -- = Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo http://www.labs.lacnic.net =

Re: [arin-announce] ARIN Resource Certification Update

Hey! Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no Because they publish data you have signed. They don't have the ability to modify the data and then sign that modification as if they were you if they aren't holding the private key. If they are holding the private key, then, you have,

Re: Level 3's IRR Database

I think we just don't know (yet) how people are going to apply RPKI. If I were operating a large network today, I would try to run RPKI in a sort of warning-only mode, i.e. getting some sort of alert if an invalid route was detected. While this wouldn't have prevented YouTube's incident, it would

Re: Monitoring Tools

On 8/19/2010 5:36 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote: But the configuration learning curve for SNMP is very steep indeed. --Curtis For some esoteric topics (dynamic tables, AgentX) this might be true, however, you can get 80% of the benefit of SNMP with 20% of the whole thing. It's a