Greetings Dave,
Having been one of the authors of this, and, at the time, unfortunately
looking down the barrel of a CGN deployment (in AU). I can say, at least in
our case, it had nothing to do with monitoring or intercept. In fact, CGN
actually made that more difficult in some circu
Greetings I'll +1 Chris's experience with startssl
On 18Feb2012, at 10.57, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:44 AM, John Peach wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:27:05 +0100
>> Phil Regnauld wrote:
>>
>>> toor (lists) writes:
I use http://www.startssl.com/ for all my pe
On 06Dec2011, at 12.28, David Barak wrote:
> From: Jeff Wheeler
>
>> Juniper does not support writing via SNMP. I am glad. Hopefully that
>> is the first step toward not supporting SNMP at all.
>
> If I recall correctly, wasn't the old FORE CLI implemented via localhost
> SNMP? I liked us
+1
--
Pardon the typos - sent from a silly keyboard
On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:09, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 03:06 PM, Brandon Kim wrote:
>> I would love to be a part of this list if there is one!!!
>
> +1
>
On 25Mar2011, at 09.17, Michael Hallgren wrote:
> Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 14:26 -0700, Bill Woodcock a écrit :
>> On Mar 24, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>>> On Mar 24, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Zaid Ali wrote:
> I have seen
Pacific tsunami warning centre has confirmed a deep ocean tsunami. Three dart
bouys have detected > 2 ft wave fronts. Warnings up for entire pacific basin
except for Alaska/canada/us west coast.
Chris
--
Pardon the typos - sent from a silly keyboard
On 10/03/2011, at 23:13, Khurram Khan wr
++
On 30Dec2010, at 12.47, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Josh Smith wrote:
>
>> While certainly not the best stuff made I've found the ubiquiti
>> equipment to be very nice for the price and have a few of their AP's
>> which have been in service 24x7 for a couple of years
nd is trying to prove to
them that he should be a reseller. Lin has told GUILLAUME to stop (not that
that will do any good). Some e-mail fragments below.
Chris
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Lin Du"
> Date: 01 November 2010 17.11.58 +1100
> To: "Christophe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings Owen,
The only problem is that there will be a number of devices that the
eyeballs like that won't ever see an IPv6 packet (specifically thinking about
the CE devices in the home). As such, it won't be IPv6 only, it will be
dual-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yes; no; without reservation; really, why would a competent lawyer have any
problems accepting that contract :) ?
On 27 Mar 2010, at 08.45 , Jeremy Charles wrote:
> Has anyone here had their legal department balk at the legal agreement that
> ARIN w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
I agree with Howard here, I don't think this is a mis-configuration,
but a harvest attempt. The "mailserver" is in different messages, and
I can't see how that could get misconfigured in a honest validation
server. My guess is tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oh, it's the truth - trust me. There was an Interop show (back when
it really was an Interoperability event) that was made quite enjoyable
for the network staff by that set of NIC cards
Chris
On 05 Sep 2008, at 07.53, Scott Berkman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
I think the 0.02 take-away for this discussion is:
If you don't feel safe doing what you are doing, or being where you
are, then stop/leave. In almost any big city, it's really not a
problem - there are lots of people around
Colin Alston wrote:
> On 16/05/2008 20:15 Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:
>> My guess is that they don't want to be tied to only announcing a
>> single /13. Each of those organizations is bigger than a lot of
>> service providers out there...
>
> Since when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
Not to address the political issues here (which are deep, wide, and
WAY too much of a black-hole), remember, that the DoD is not a single
organization from a networking perspective. There are a number of
different organizatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
Interesting comment Paul. However, 16e and evdo are a "bit" heavy
with infrastructure to support mobility. Before giving that answer,
you may want to ask Deepak if he NEEDS mobility
Chris
On 16 May 2008, at 10.23, Paul W
16 matches
Mail list logo
