Le Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 07:12:57PM +0100, Job Snijders via NANOG a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 05:41:12PM +, Ray Orsini via NANOG wrote:
> > What tools are you using to monitor BGP announcements and route changes?
>
> The wonderful BGP.tools already has been mentioned a few times.
>
>
Le Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 03:24:21PM -0800, David Conrad a écrit :
> This doesn’t seem all that positive to me, particularly because it’s temporary
> since the underlying problem (limited resource, unlimited demand) cannot be
> addressed.
>
I agree with this.
Yet I am in favor of changing the
Le Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 07:52:09AM -0600, Mike Hammett a écrit :
> For those of you who list your network (usually wireline, but sometimes
> wireless) with third parties, are you supplying just the KMZ or lit buildings
> as well? If lit buildings, are you including residential? How are you
>
Le Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 11:17:22AM -0500, Mike Hammett a écrit :
> Has anyone else noticed a trend of some network operators that previously
> offered street-level detailed maps, not only upon request, but also posted
> publicly have started to only provide them upon quotes?
>
There is no small
Le Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 03:12:29PM -0300, Jean Franco a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I know this must have been on the table before, but I'm looking for a
> in-house solution, something I can host on our own datacenter to document
> fiber networks, maps and so forth.
>
I use a mix of Qgis, PostgreSQL,
Le Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 02:42:47AM +0100, Ignas Bagdonas a écrit :
> A brief overview of developments happening in the IETF working groups
> related to BGP evolution. The view is current as of mid-2023, in the
> timeframe between IETF meetings 116 and 117, and looking back several years
> to cover
Le Wed, May 03, 2023 at 06:20:48AM +, Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG a écrit :
>
> Additionally, I am sure that in many countries/Metro it is cheaper to lay
> down a new fiber than to provision DWDM, even if it is a pizza box. The
> colored interface is still very expensive.
> Of course, there
Le Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:16:13AM -0700, Chris Grundemann a écrit :
> Update: The survey has received almost 4 dozen responses already!
>
> Of course, for the most meaningful results possible, I'd like to see that
> about 10x higher.
>
Don't expect too much when you need a Google account to
Le Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 01:39:59PM -0500, Bryan Fields a écrit :
> On 11/18/22 6:44 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
> >> We could, but many of our DIA customers have all manner of CPE's that
> >> may or may not support this. Having unique designs per customer does
> >> not scale well.
> > its almost 2023.
Le Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 08:12:07AM -0500, Mike Hammett a écrit :
> Would it matter if it took 10 minutes or an hour?
>
Yes, it means the computer could be off for 50 minutes.
Also everyone who had a connection reset when uploading a big file after 55
minutes understands why it is good if it
Le Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 05:08:43PM -0800, William Herrin a écrit :
> I don't recall there being any equipment or software compatibility
> concerns with 1.0.0.0/8. If you do, feel free to refresh my memory.
Perhaps not the whole /8 but definitely some buggy implementations :
Le Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Bill Woodcock a écrit :
> If you’re peering with an MLPA route-server, you’re welcome to include just
> the route-server’s ASN, if that’s easiest, rather than trying to include each
> of the peer ASNs on the other side of the route-server. Either way is
> You mention a 25-minute difference between racking a no-tools rail kit and
> one that requires a screwdriver. At any reasonable hourly rate for someone
> to rack and stack that is a very small percentage of the cost of the
> hardware. If a device that takes half an hour to rack is $50 cheaper
Le Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:46:34AM +0100, Steve Lalonde a écrit :
>
> We always use PeeringDB data and refuse to peer with networks not in PeeingDB
>
That !
Le Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:40:21PM -0600, Clinton Work a écrit :
> Is there any compiled information for Tier1 providers on the supported BGP
> filter generation data sources and frequency?
>
> This is what I have been able to determine so far:
> - TATA AS6453: IRR and RPKI ROAs
>
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 07:52:17AM -0700, Damian Menscher via NANOG wrote:
> > There is a persistent mythos -- a worst practice, actually -- among many
> > operations that obfuscating the reasons why messages are rejected is
> > useful.
> > This is wrong.
> >
> > Consider: either the sender is
On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 05:58:39PM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> 8.8.4.5.13.9/40
> 8.8.4.5.17.168/40
>
This is so unreadable to me :/
My brain keeps on wondering if this is an "IPv4+" or a phone number or a typo...
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:05:28PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Matthew Walster wrote on 12/02/2019 14:50:
> > For initial deployment, this can seem attractive, but remember that one
> > of the benefits an ROA gives is specifying the maximum prefix length.
> > This means that someone can't hijack
> Yup, super professional of them.
>
Have you tried to order a port on DirectConnect to check if it was hassleless ?
:p
> On 28/Nov/16 19:53, Kasper Adel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Vendor X wants you to run their VNF (Router, Firewall or Whatever) and they
> refuse to give you root access, or any means necessary to do 'maintenance'
> kind of work, whether its applying security updates, or any other similar
> type of task
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:49:40AM -0600, William Astle wrote:
> it usually boils down to "we don't want to put any effort or resources into
> updating anything".
>
And they must be right as their clients won't go away... :p
Hi all,
Is there any study on ERPS/G.8032 interoperability between different equipment
manufacturer ?
Denis
> How does Solid Optics compare on pricing? They don't list them on their
> website.
>
Last time I checked, it was roughly US$90 for a SFP-10G-LR+-SO.
> >>Plus one to that. We are such a provider, and IPv6 is on my list of
> >>things to implement, but the barriers are still plenty high. Firstly, I
> >>do have an Ipv6 assignmnt and bgp (v4) and an asn, but until I can get
> >>IPv6 transit,
> >
> >There are lots of transit providers that provide
> Building a secure firewall takes more than just knowing how to issue
> ip6table commands; one also needs to know exactly what goes into those
> commands. NANOG concentrates on network operators who need to provide a
> good Internet experience to all their downstream customers, which is why I
>
Hi experts
Cisco has open sourced one part of their BGP monitoring system - YABGP
And hosted source code on GitHub. https://github.com/smartbgp/yabgp
Documentation: http://yabgp.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
I don't want to be mean but is it of any use in 2015 to release a tool that
doesn't
the possibility of building a true 'Internet kill switch' with effects far
beyond what various governmental bodies have managed to do so far in the DNS
space.
Could you elaborate ? I don't see how it could be worse.
Comparing with DNS is not relevant IMHO. Everyone is managing its own
I was wondering which tool(s) can I use to measure the performance of my 3
DNS servers (1 primary, 1 secondary, 1 solely cacheDNS)? From the stats I
would like to know if my DNS server is serving as it should be or if any of
it's options are set inappropriately and others alike.
Perhaps
Hi,
Price and functionality-wise Planet MGSW-28240F and GSD-1020S look
pretty close to what I'm looking for. Anyone have real experience
with using them on a large scale? Performance?
Thank you for the pointer to MGSW-28240F. I am also curious to hear some
feedback as the gear is awfully
Le 12/08/2014 17:15, Justin Wilson a écrit :
Another thing to consider is how you feel about the configuration.
Mikrotik has a more polished GUI and command subset. UBNT is still
working things out. A lot of what you have to to do with the UBNT line
has to still be done in command
Hi all,
Le 23/03/2014 20:13, Mark Tinka a écrit :
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 09:05:54 PM Cb B wrote:
i would say the more appropriate place for this policy is
the printer, not a firewall. For example, maybe a
printer should only be ULA or LLA by default.
I would support adding security
31 matches
Mail list logo
