On 20 Feb 2013, at 5:22 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:59:53AM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>> If only there were some kind of method for Jay to publish which
>> addresses are actually authorized to send mail on behalf of [snip]
>
> SPF is snake-oil. Here's something
On 06 Feb 2013, at 11:58 AM, Ray Wong wrote:
> Does anyone have details on tonight's apparent worldwide emergency
> router upgrade? All I managed to get out of the portal was 30 minutes,
> "Service Affecting" (no kidding?) and the NOC line gave me the
> recording about it and disconnected me.
Not
On 14 Jan 2013, at 4:00 PM, James Wininger wrote:
> All,
>
> We are running into an issue with Brocade where we are finding it difficult
> to to graph VLAN interfaces for bits (in/out) across a tagged (trunk)
> interface. On Cisco this is not an issue. So what we end up with in Cacti is
> a bl
On 10 Jan 2013, at 6:41 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> No. A /64 has 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses. Even if you
> had machines that supported zettabytes of data the zone would never
> load in human lifetimes.
Because hitting things in memory is the only way we can ever respond to a data
reque
On 02 Jan 2013, at 3:20 PM, Luis Palma Lopez via LinkedIn
wrote:
> This email was intended for ***Ted Fischer***
A whole new year and things are still the same…
-J
On 13 Dec 2012, at 12:25 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 13/12/2012 10:10, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
>> nevertheless, IPPlan, PHPIP, PHPIPAM are good enough as per the need. The
>> first one I assume should serve your purpose for both v4 and v6.
>
> I've had a lot more success with Racktables and Netdo
On 07 Dec 2012, at 10:33 AM, Seiichi Kawamura wrote:
> FYI, another big earthquake in Japan just now. M7.3
Inland or coast?
On 23 Oct 2012, at 11:52 PM, Ryan Singel wrote:
> A colleague is working on a story that a particular country not to be named
> implemented technology to block a particular infamous riot-inducing video
> for a certain section of its populace.
>
> The questions are: 1) how hard is this to do at sc
On 17 Oct 2012, at 5:35 AM, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten
wrote:
> I want to like IPv6. I do. But I'm seriously considering turning off IPv6
> support from our servers.
>
> First off, I'm using djbdns internally and it doesn't support records.
> So we really aren't using it internally.
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:06:15 +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko
wrote:
Google DNS was down few minutes, at least for few European locations
Here is sample traceroute:
4 213.242.116.25 (213.242.116.25) 39.692 ms 39.776 ms 39.774 ms
5 ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net (4.69.143.238) 50.933 ms 50
10 matches
Mail list logo
