On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 9:12 AM Neader, Brent
wrote:
>
> 5nines is in that building, they list available carriers on their spec sheet,
> it is a pretty respectable selection. Unsure of how the MMR or cross
> connects work in building though.
>
It's a semi free for all. You'll want to get into
> I can't think of a public presentation off the top of my head that
> explains how each major transition technology works, and the pros and
> cons of each. There must be one, but it's hard to cover the major
> options in an hour.
Actually your post is better than a presentation. I was quite
surpr
Is there a summary presentation someplace laying out the options that
are active in the wild with some deployment stats?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:34 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
wrote:
>
> I understand that, but the inconvenient is the fix allocation of ports per
> client, and not all the
> https://github.com/jda/maintnote-std/blob/master/standard.md
>
> NTT / AS 2914’s NOC follows this process to keep customers and partners
> informed about maintenances.
Is there commercial or open source software that already has this implemented?
MICE is technically a cooperative not a non-profit. The fees cover the
costs and just the costs and the members are owners.
Also MICE does not provide any transport. All transport to remote locations
is provided by the network hosting the remote switch.
Jay
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, 9:16 AM Mike Ham
I'd expect at least a couple of hours of outage while the cable is reconnected.
When doing the move on the live cable (assuming 1 cable). There will
be a splicing crew at each end of the move. They will then break a
tube or ribbon at a time and splice into the new cable.
Splicing unused portions
I think you are talking about different applications of remote peering.
If you connect to a remote IX via transport the routing decision is
more along the lines is this packet destined to me. Having a router
sitting in the "remote" colo is of little value. It would not help to
keep the traffic loc
The peering social at previous NANOG meetings has been excellent and
very useful. As you mentioned, the peering personals are perhaps not
as valuable. It would be great to see the social portion come back in
some form.
Jay
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
> The Peering Personal
There are lots of national carriers in the US. A much smaller number
of those carriers actually own the fiber cables. There are a handful
(Zayo, Level3, CenturyLink, Windstream, Earthlink, Verizon) that have
very large national, or semi-national foot prints.
The carriers frequently trade and lease
Does anyone have experiences they can share regarding the Mellanox
100GE Ethernet switches?
Thanks!
Jay
Getting networks to connect to an ix is Uber expensive in relation to the
overall costs. Specifically before critical mass is reached. Getting the
first X gig of traffic is a hard problem that takes money to fix.
On Apr 19, 2015 7:51 AM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> There is a revenue floor where it d
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
>> Indeed. I think that ISPs who understand their business model well
>> enough to understand the effect the IXP will have on their
>> average-per-bit-delivery-cost is essential. I think it's also essential
>> that they have some basic famil
After a bit of googling, I found some references to an Internet
Exchange in St. Louis, MO called the St. Louis Regional Exchange.
Is this project still active?
Thanks,
Jay
> We have 3 J2320s in the lab, all running 9.3R3.8. That's the last
> *real* JunOS (no session/flow tracking) for these boxes.
>
+1 on that. We have a number of 2300s in our lab for the same purpose
running 8.x code.
We also use Junosphere extensively, but nothing beats real hardware.
j2300s are
How critical is BGP MD5 at Internet Exchange Points? Would lack of
support for MD5 authentication on route servers prevent some peers
from multilaterally connecting? Do most exchange operators support it?
Thanks!
Jay
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Or peer with HE and buy transit from Cogent (or someone on Cogent's friendly
> list) - this is where I think their strategy is going to go after a while
> with a lot of folks (if they have the option - that's the key). HE will
> peer with anyo
[snip]
> Does anybody have some numbers they're able to share? In the "two small
ISPs
> in the boonies" scenario, *is* there enough cross traffic to make an
> interconnect worth it? (I'd expect that gaming/IM/email across town to a
friend
> on The Other ISP would dominate here?) Or are both compe
On 3/4/10 8:57 AM, "Jay Hanke" wrote:
>>
>> We've seen the same issues in Minnesota. Locally referred to as the
"Chicago
>>. Problem". Adding on to point 3, there is also a lack of neutral
facilities
>> with a sufficient amount of traffic to
On Mar 4, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Antonio Querubin wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Sean Donelan wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs
exchange traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest
exchange point
19 matches
Mail list logo
