Re: [NANOG] NANOG TEST

On 07/10/2011 10:03 PM, Steve Feldman wrote: Another test, sorry for the noise. Steve Well, at least the fears that nanog would be IPv4 only are unfounded.. Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::14])... -- Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org

Re: The state-level attack on the SSL CA security model

the friend us for a chance to win $prize gimmicks... not a far jump to friend us, _with trust bits enabled_ for a chance to win $prize Yeah sounds like a wonderful idea. :P -- Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org

Re: Blocking International DNS

is its not a DNS server. :P It's shortsighted and problematic, which is usually what happens when technical discussions are dictated by politics. Yup. -- Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org

Re: Blocking International DNS

and the yell of Search warrant, we hear you're running an uncensored BIND -- Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org

Re: What must one do to avoid Gmail's retarded non-spam filtering?

-- Joe Sniderman