Re: Best TAC Services from Equipment Vendors

It may be a pain in the butt to get Cisco equipment, but their TAC is sublime.  If something is critical enough, and you push hard enough, Cisco will move heaven and earth to solve your issue.  — Sent from my iPhoneOn Mar 6, 2024, at 13:42, Pascal Masha wrote:For us this has been the experience t

Re: Any info on AT&T Wireless Outage?

/me waves my hand dismissingly— Sent from my iPhoneOn Feb 29, 2024, at 14:55, Javier J wrote:Where did you see this? Erik Prince was on the PBD podcast saying he has a 70% chance in his head it was China. I tend to learn towards human error from my experience in the IT biz.- JOn Wed, Feb 28, 2024

Re: How threading works (was Re: Root Cause Re: 202401102221.AYC Re: Streamline The CG-NAT Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block)

Things you have to remember.  Not everyone uses thunderbird.  Not every mail client threads like thunderbird.  — Sent from my iPhoneOn Jan 13, 2024, at 17:39, Abraham Y. Chen wrote: Hi, Bryan: 0)    Thank you so much for coming to the rescue!!!

Re: Auth0 geolocation?

I bet money it’s maxmind. — Sent from my iPhoneOn Apr 6, 2023, at 20:33, Tim Burke wrote: Anyone know who Auth0 is using for geolocation services? Have a customer reporting that Auth0, Lowes, Bank of America, and some other sites are reporting their IP in the wrong location. Checked the usual

Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions

> On Dec 16, 2022, at 12:04 PM, ic wrote: > > Hi there, > >> On 16 Dec 2022, at 17:13, William Herrin > > wrote: >> >> Most email clients assume that a change to the subject line (other >> than adding "Re:" to the front) indicates that the sender wants to >> discuss a n

Re: What say you, nanog re: Starlink vs 5G?

> On Jun 24, 2022, at 3:38 PM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > > It’s not entirely clear, without knowing the technical details of the > Starlink modulation scheme whether or not they could successfully share the > 12Ghz spectrum. > > I have no reason to disbelieve their claims. Exactly. W

Re: Flow collection and analysis

Are you asking for commercial solutions? Free solutions? Open Source? > On Jan 25, 2022, at 10:46 AM, David Bass wrote: > > Wondering what others in the small to medium sized networks out there are > using these days for netflow data collection, and your opinion on the tool? > > Thanks!

Re: OpenDNS contact

Tell your friend to head over to talosintelligence.com/support and file a dispute. — Sent from my  iPad > On Nov 19, 2021, at 08:41, Mark Costlow wrote: > > Does anyone have a contact within OpenDNS? A friend's business is in > extreme pain because a false-positive blacklisting and he h

Re: Hulu and HBO

I believe HBO is using MLB's network. -- Joel Esler Sent from my iPhone On May 17, 2015, at 6:38 PM, Josh Reynolds mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>> wrote: Mike, to test, change DNS. On May 17, 2015 2:04:18 PM AKDT, Mike Hammett mailto:na...@ics-il.net>> wrote: When I fire up th

[no subject]

--- Begin Message --- Seeing them here too. -- Joel Esler Sent from my iPhone On May 7, 2015, at 9:58 PM, Paul Ferguson via NANOG mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> wrote: --- End Message ---

Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers

So am I correct in assuming that unless you go >100Mb, and other than the N router to replace the G router, there isn’t anything beneficial? -- Joel Esler Open Source Manager Threat Intelligence Team Lead Talos Group On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Matthew Huff mailto:mh...@ox.com>&g

Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers

I don't believe Quantum has any changes relative to the external of the house. Fios has been capable of pushing those speeds with the "old" modem for years. The difference between the old modem and the new one is that the wireless is 802.11n whereas the old one was only capable

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

Can we all just agree that the whole pole needs to be restrung? That's horrible! On Aug 20, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Harry Hoffman wrote: > What? That's totally legit. Look! There's even bubble wrap there for > cushioning! ;-) > > On 08/20/2012 03:09 PM, Eric Wieling wrote: >> For a while we have had

Re: EBAY and AMAZON

These are exploit kit teasers. Black hole exploit kit specifically. I wouldn't click on any of the links in there. Anyone who would like to send me copies of these, I'll take. -- Joel Esler On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote: > I have a spam pit email ad

Re: Cat Humor

But a Cat 6 is one more isn't it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbVKWCpNFhY -- Joel Esler On Monday, June 4, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Eric Wieling wrote: > > I'm not looking for help, just thought this was hilarious. > > "Mark called in from XO he stated a tech was

Re: NANOG Digest... digest or closer to IM?

I think you just volunteered. -- Joel Esler On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Mark Kent wrote: > I got 29 NANOG Digest messages in the past 24 hours. > > Where are those people who have time to complain about the noise on > this list? Did they all leave? Is anyone else willin

Re: medicare.gov / cms.gov DNSSEC Validation Failures

Ditto. On Dec 29, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 06:39:21PM -0600, Richard Laager wrote: >> I'm looking for a DNS contact for medicare.gov (and cms.gov). They are >> failing DNSSEC validation. > > Seeing it still broken, I contacted someone over at

Re: medicare.gov / cms.gov DNSSEC Validation Failures

On Dec 28, 2010, at 11:39 PM, William Warren wrote: > On 12/28/2010 8:43 PM, Nate Itkin wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 06:39:21PM -0600, Richard Laager wrote: >>> I'm looking for a DNS contact for medicare.gov (and cms.gov). They are >>> failing DNSSEC validation. >> Ditto. Similar to uspto.gov

Re: wikileaks unreachable

I copied and pasted that from another list, however, when I brought up the twitter feed it said "six hours ago" (when i sent that first email). Now I don't see the tweet. So, the truth may vary. Sent from my iPad On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:06 PM, "kmedc...@dessus.com" wrote: >> Uh... huh? > >

Re: wikileaks unreachable

I've heard it's a DOS (not DDOS) according to twitter. Allegedly according to the person doing the DOS: Just so we are all straight and clear - wikileaks hit is not a 'Distributed' DoS, its a simple DoS - I dont use intermediaries or botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST http://twitter.com/th3j35t3r

Re: Gratuitous syn/ack

I am betting backscatter. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:31 PM, Pete Carah wrote: > I'm seeing a significant number (about 1/minute 24 hr/day) of syn/ack > packets coming from port 80 of random addresses to random ports on my > nameserver and a few other systems. This isn't enoug

Re: ARIN recognizes Interop for return of more than 99% of 45/8 address block

On Oct 20, 2010, at 4:58 PM, David Conrad wrote: > On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Joel Esler wrote: >> There are lots of places that /8, and multiple ones at that that aren't >> using them. > > Which /8s are those? As someone else mentioned the Gov't has /8&#

Re: ARIN recognizes Interop for return of more than 99% of 45/8 address block

ely to be greater? That was my overall point. There are lots of places that /8, and multiple ones at that that aren't using them. I'm not saying it'll put off going to v6 for years, but it'll help in our current time. -- Joel Esler http://www.joelesler.net

Re: ARIN recognizes Interop for return of more than 99% of 45/8 address block

op's return will not significantly extend the life of >> IPv4. ARIN continues to emphasize the need for all Internet stakeholders to >> adopt the next generation of Internet Protocol, IPv6. >> >> Regards, >> >> Communications and Member Services >> American Registry for Internet Numbers >> > > -- Joel Esler http://www.joelesler.net

Re: Network Naming Conventions

; discarded. > > Andrew > > Greg Whynott wrote: >> We use confidence inspiring names here for our devices, shakey, broken, >> jitter, crusty >> >> G >> > > -- Joel Esler http://blog.joelesler.net

Re: unsubscribe

Please review the link at the very bottom of every email for instructions on how to unsubscribe. -- Joel Esler Sent from my iPhone On Mar 12, 2010, at 10:27 AM, "Ramsden, Colt" wrote: unsubscribe -- Colt Ramsden Programmer Analyst II Sam Houston State University 936.294.4

Re: CRS-3

quot; here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they >> are?" > > Because in some organisations, the only vendor that matters is Cisco. -- Joel Esler http://blog.joelesler.net

Re: CRS-3

Yes, it says that right in the press release. J -- Joel Esler joel.es...@me.com http://www.joelesler.net On Tuesday, March 09, 2010, at 03:09PM, "Brandon Galbraith" wrote: >It was mentioned that Att is already testing this with a 100gbps fiber run. > >On Mar 9, 2010 1:

Re: Security Guideance

Why does there need to be blame? Diagnose the problem, fix the problem, move on with life. Someone made a mistake, learn from it, move on. -- Joel Esler joel.es...@me.com http://www.joelesler.net On Tuesday, February 23, 2010, at 05:13PM, wrote: >On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:27:21 -1000, N

Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee

ugh to supply everything you need is big enough to > take everything you have." > > Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals. > > Requiescas in pace o email > Ex turpi causa non oritur actio > Eppure si rinfresca > > ICBM Targeting Informatio

Re: Google to offer fiber to end users

I have gig copper ran all over my house. Handy for large file transfers. I have fios as well, and wish it was faster. (yes, all I know is it's a setting, it costs them nothing more) -- Joel Esler 302-223-5974 Sent from my iPhone On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:02 PM, "Luan Nguyen"

Re: more news from Google

On Jan 13, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote: >> You don't like the law, don't do biz in that country. But blatantly >> breaking a law is bad joo-joo. > > OT. > Please don't say "joo-joo" every time the TechCrunch folks see that > they get diarrhea That is a horrible name for a product. J

Re: Default Passwords for World Wide Packets/Lightning Edge Equipment

s providing "default" > > security for the folks who won't change the default password. > > The MyFi apparently does this. According to > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/07/technology/personaltech/07pogue.html"The > network password is printed right there on the bottom of the MiFi > itself." > > At least it's not "". But yes, my Mifi *had* the password on the bottom. -- Joel Esler

Re: IPv6 Training

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00:28PM -0800, Marty Anstey wrote: > Greetings, > > Just wondering if anyone has had any experience with IPv6 training courses. > > A quick search turns up a few results on the subject, but it would be > handy to hear if anyone has any firsthand experiences or recommend

Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style)

at you need to write in a way that makes > it easier for your reader to read: use real sentences with real > capital letters at the beginnings of them, and do try to spell as many > words right as you can muster. > > So mind your manners, learn to communicate better, stop insulting your > readers, and then come back and contribute your intellect to [this] > mailing list. If you keep acting like a jerk I'm going to wake > up some morning, yawn, make a cup of tea, and then vaporize your > mailbox. Sometimes we supremely powerful technocrats just have a bad > day. > > --- End of Forwarded Message > > This is a great email, it belongs on countless blogs. Written back then, still relevant now. J -- Joel Esler | 302-223-5974 | gtalk: jes...@sourcefire.com

Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style)

On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:18 PM, Lou Katz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:48:25PM -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote: >> >> On Dec 7, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: >> >>> >>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:29 PM, John Levine wrote: >>> > Will be interesting to see if ISPs respond to a large scale t

Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style)

On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:35 PM, John R. Levine wrote: >> It's why I run an ssh server on 443 somewhere -- and as needed, I ssh-tunnel >> http to a squid proxy, smtp, and as many IMAP/SSL connections as I really >> need... > > Same here. It's the most reliable way to break out of a hotel jail. F

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Jack Bates wrote: > jim deleskie wrote: >> >> I agree we should all be telling the FCC that broadband is fiber to >> the home.  If we spend all kinds of $$ to build a 1.5M/s connection to >> homes, it's outdated before we even finish. > > I disagree. I much prefer f

Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.

sane legal forum. (I*A*AL) This ISN'T the first time this has happened. Exactly. Now you see the problem ? -- Joel Esler  http://www.joelesler.net  http://www.twitter.com/joelesler [m]

Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.

eciated. No ears enclosing clue will be reached via normal channels at ~950E on a Sunday, but this is clearly a problem needing addressing, resolution, action and, who knows - suit? Thanks in advance all for insight, comments, -jamie -- Joel Esler  http://www.joelesler.net  http://www.twi

Re: Google News Down?

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Nitin Sharma wrote: > I can reach Google News through icmp traceroutes, but the HTTP response > says > "Server Error".Anyone seeing this too? > All fine here. -- joel esler | Sourcefire | gtalk: jes...@sourcefire.com | 302-223-597

Re: RE: delays to google

345 ms 2.342 ms 3.132 ms >> > > > 3 axr01asm-7-1-0-1.bellsouth.net (65.83.237.90) 3.338 ms 3.331 ms 3.322 >> > > > ms >> > > > 4 axr00msy-0-3-1.bellsouth.net (65.83.236.46) 3.112 ms 3.105 ms 3.095 ms >> > > > 5 65.83.238.202 (65.83.238.202) 3.503 ms 3.654 ms * >> > > > 6 cr2.attga.ip.att.net (12.122.140.22) 4.489 ms 3.823 ms 3.795 ms >> > > > 7 12.123.22.129 (12.123.22.129) 3.591 ms 3.094 ms 3.079 ms >> > > > 8 12.88.97.6 (12.88.97.6) 3.197 ms 3.172 ms 3.160 ms >> > > > 9 72.14.233.56 (72.14.233.56) 3.322 ms 3.490 ms 72.14.233.54 >> > > > (72.14.233.54) 3.510 ms >> > > > 10 209.85.254.249 (209.85.254.249) 16.887 ms 3.501 ms 72.14.239.127 >> > > > (72.14.239.127) 4.261 ms >> > > > 11 209.85.253.214 (209.85.253.214) 12.987 ms 12.979 ms 209.85.253.218 >> > > > (209.85.253.218) 3.882 ms >> > > > 12 gx-in-f99.google.com (74.125.65.99) 4.357 ms 4.740 ms 4.481 ms >> > > > > > > > > > --Patrick Darden >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- joel esler | Sourcefire | gtalk: jes...@sourcefire.com | 302-223-5974 | http://twitter.com/joelesler

Re: Packet Loss to Google, others

66 60.0%20 317.4 319.6 314.1 328.0 > 4.5 > 13. he-in-f147.google.com45.0%20 323.9 321.5 312.1 332.9 > 6.9 > > > --- > Peter Beckman Internet > Guy > beck...@angryox.com > http://www.angryox.com/ > > --- > > > -- joel esler | Sourcefire | gtalk: jes...@sourcefire.com | 302-223-5974 | http://twitter.com/joelesler

Re: Cart and Horse

On Apr 13, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Robert Glover wrote: This bears investigating. I live 3 blocks away. Looks like I'm going on a stroll after work tonight. Bobby Glover Director of Information Services South Valley Interet (AS4307) - Original Message - From: "Roy" To: "nanog" Sent: Mo

Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless

Exactly. On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > Eliot Lear wrote: > > On 2/8/09 3:24 AM, Jeff S Wheeler wrote: > >> Sure, smart phones are becoming more popular. It's reasonable to assume > >> that virtually all cell phones will eventually have an IP address almost > >> all the

Re: Security Intelligence [Was: Re: Netblock reassigned from Chile to US ISP...]

k for Sourcefire. We make Snort. -- Joel Esler  http://www.joelesler.net [m]

Re: Cap'n Bubba the marine backhoe driver - SEA-ME-WE 3 and 4, FLAG cut

ck to normal. -- Joel Esler  http://www.joelesler.net [m]

Re: Comcast DNS

I have received reports of some strangeness going on with Google on Comcast's networks today as well. Joel On Dec 8, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Matthew Elmore allegedly wrote: No response at all for recursive queries The servers I was using (can't find the IPs at the moment..) I believe were the N

Re: Verizon outage between Baltimore and Washington

Just to agree, I am in Columbia, MD as well, and am unaffected. J On Nov 19, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Steven Fischer wrote: looks like a single breakBaltimore is about 36.4 miles north of Washington, and Laurel is about 16.25 miles north of Washington, with Baltimore being about 20 miles north of

nanog@nanog.org

like 10 bucks). A search of enterprise paging > in AT&T's stuff gives you the info on TAP, as well as the various internet > protocol's supported (which I prefer with TAP as fallback). > > Jack > > -- --Joel Esler ISC Incident Handler http://www.joelesler.net

Re: Verizon Contactg

You've been forwarded. J On Aug 6, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Alan Halachmi wrote: Would someone from Verizon please contact me? Or, if you know of a technical contact for Verizon, please pass it along. Thanks. Best, Alan -- Joel Esler  http://blog.joelesler.net 

Re: Level3 tries cell-phone style billing scam on customers

this same behavior from Level3? (It seems that the larger a telecom company gets, the more they want to act like a scum-sucking ILEC.) --Patrick -- Joel Esler  http://blog.joelesler.net  http://www.dearcupertino.com [m]