In addition to RSVP or may be worth using minimum modulation settings on
the radios if possible. IE so that links completely drop and you re-route
rather than run with less bandwidth.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 6:34 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
> I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking
Any idea if Juniper will support that on MX?
On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 at 03:35, Michael Still wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 3:59 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2/25/22 09:04, Saku Ytti wrote:
>>
>>
>> Then you went too far. For many users the 40G port is there to increase
>> 10G density,
I did realise a little after this that it would be a no no to talk this
security wise.
On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 12:47, Mark Tees wrote:
> I might be reading this wrong but it appears only one person has raised an
> issue and then not actually backed it up with data.
>
> Out of the ey
I might be reading this wrong but it appears only one person has raised an
issue and then not actually backed it up with data.
Out of the eyes that have views inside the major networks did anyone see
any issues?
Surely cross posting this to other NOG lists is sufficienct.
On Sat, 26 Jan 2019
For the lists benefit, there is a 6 X 10GBE option for the ASR1000
series it seems. No idea on pricing though.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/application-networking-services/wide-area-application-services-waas-software/data-sheet-c78-729778.pdf
Cheers,
Mark
On Wed, May 20,
Flowspec and roll your own firewall rules applied via Netconf
for transit interfaces to achieve the same sort of functionality.
On 02/08/2013, at 3:30 AM, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 10:00:49AM +1000, Mark Tees wrote:
Howdy listers,
I remember
Howdy listers,
I remember reading a while back that customers of nLayer IP transit
services could send in Flowspec rules to nLayer. Anyone know if that is
true/current?
Thanks,
--
Regards,
Mark
7 matches
Mail list logo
