Any idea if Juniper will support that on MX? On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 at 03:35, Michael Still <stillwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 3:59 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote: > >> >> >> On 2/25/22 09:04, Saku Ytti wrote: >> >> >> Then you went too far. For many users the 40G port is there to increase >> 10G density, by offering 4x10GE breakout. It is already difficult to >> support 1GE customers and 10GE is starting to become problematic. But SP >> networks actually have these customers, and not every application on the >> Internet will always need more and more capacity, so many of these >> customers have no requirement to ever purchase faster ports. >> >> If you live in cloudyworld, sure, denser and faster. But this mode of >> thinking is making life at SP networks rather difficult. >> >> >> 100%. >> >> New boxes from Juniper that have shipped with a minimum of 10Gbps when we >> still have 1Gbps use-cases has meant we've put orders off. 12 months later, >> they have new iterations of the boxes now allowing for all the way down to >> 1Gbps. >> >> > Check out the Adva MicroMux Nano for this use case if you haven't already. > 10x 1g in a single 10g transceiver using a 24S MPO. They also have a 10x > 10g in a single QSFP28 as well. > > >> CloudyWorld is giving OEM's the impression that NetworkWorld also have >> the same requirements. It's good to see some OEM's are getting back to >> their roots, but it's not easy work. >> >> DWDM vendors are the worst, because they look at all orders with DCI eye >> glasses. >> >> Mark. >> > > > -- > [stillwa...@gmail.com ~]$ cat .signature > cat: .signature: No such file or directory > [stillwa...@gmail.com ~]$ cat all-opinions-are-my-own > All opinions are my own and do not represent any of my employer. > > -- M Tees