On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:22 AM Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
>
>
> Occurs to me that "the last second of today" is approximately a million
> times
> more likely as a scheduling target than "the next to last second"; they
> should
> drop 23:59:5*8* instead.
You’re probably one of those folks who wonder
orically
> eliminate sensitive information. As a result, ExpressVPN can never be
> compelled to provide customer data that does not exist.
>
...until the NSL arrives.
Matthew Kaufman
e.
If you are in the new PST and set your timezone to MST then all times
before November 2023 are displayed incorrectly.
Matthew Kaufman
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 5:44 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 10/5/21 14:08, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG wrote:
>
> > Maybe withdrawing those routes to their NS could have been mitigated by
> having NS in separate entities.
>
> Well, doesn't really matter if you can resolve the A//MX records,
> but
,
plus the antenna gains are lower)
Matthew Kaufman
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 7:18 PM Dave Phelps wrote:
> Perhaps I'm being cynical, but thank [deity of choice] that the cell
> carriers want it made available for this purpose.
>
> Reference: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments
peninsula. Not looking forward to
that.
Matthew Kaufman
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 7:15 PM Benson Schliesser via NANOG
wrote:
> Indeed, this does seem like good news under the current situation. It's
> good for users, and it's nice PR for both the FCC and the WISPs. But I'm
> c
hard, try using a novel IP protocol number.
Matthew Kaufman
>
>
> I suppose it’s not impossible, but I’m wondering how they afford the other
> expenses associated with maintaining such a network.
>
> Owen
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2019, at 09:00 , Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
> I administer two networks that use legacy IPv4 blocks (one al
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 5:55 PM Valdis Klētnieks
wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2019 13:47:36 -0800, Matthew Kaufman said:
>
> > User apps prefer IPv6, Netflix stops, users complain
>
> And fallback to IPv4 fails to happen, why, exactly?
>
Because of the layer at which fai
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 4:57 PM Brandon Martin
wrote:
> On 11/30/19 4:48 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> > See previous message about legacy IPv4 holders without budget for IPv6
> blocks
>
> How slim are your margins to have been around long enough to have a legacy
> IPv4 blo
2014. This is just one example of many.
Matthew Kaufman
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 1:29 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
> And how did that stop you deploying IPv6? It’s not like you were turning
> off IPv4.
> --
> Mark Andrews
>
> On 1 Dec 2019, at 04:03, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
See previous message about legacy IPv4 holders without budget for IPv6
blocks
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 12:15 PM Filip Hruska wrote:
> You can announce your own IPv6 subnets through TunnelBroker.
>
> Filip
>
>
> On 30 November 2019 8:37:33 pm GMT+01:00, Matthew Kaufman <
User apps prefer IPv6, Netflix stops, users complain
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 1:29 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
> And how did that stop you deploying IPv6? It’s not like you were turning
> off IPv4.
> --
> Mark Andrews
>
> On 1 Dec 2019, at 04:03, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
Won’t come back until
both my up streams properly support it.
Matthew Kaufman
>
>
This is a great example (but just one of many) of how server software
development works:
IANA IPv4 runout January 2011.
Kubernetes initial release June 2014. Developed by Google engineers.
ARIN IPv4 runout September 2015.
Support for IPv6-only Kubernetes clusters alphas in 1.9, December 2017.
adopters are still sometimes early adopters.
But you’re right, what could have been supported on a volunteer basis is
now a profit center. Especially for IPv6, which is once-and-done if sized
properly.
Matthew Kaufman
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM wrote:
>
> If the commitment really was to
Are any of the rats using routable IP addresses?
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:11 AM wrote:
>
> There's a fairly famous animal behavior experiment where rats are
> allowed to multiply in a room-sized cage without control, food and
> water and basic sanitation are provided.
>
> When the cage becomes
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:36 PM John Curran wrote:
> On 22 Jul 2019, at 4:17 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
> ...
>
> That's why a real RIR for this space would have had a policy development
> process where *the community* could weigh in on ideas like "sell of 1/4
pped being used solely for its original purpose. That's why
a real RIR for this space would have had a policy development process where
*the community* could weigh in on ideas like "sell of 1/4 of it so we can
have a big endowment". Which, heck, we might have all agreed to... if there
w
out).
So providers should stamp this out (because it is “bad”) and support
customers who are running TOR nodes (because those are “good”). Did I get
that right?
Matthew Kaufman
>
>
In other words, they’re on The Internet and you (and your transit provider)
are not.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:40 AM David Hubbard <
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote:
> Google and HE don't have IPv6 connectivity with Cogent because Cogent's
> CEO has been in some decades long pissing match wi
Every IP of mine that's banned is banned because of a hacked Mikrotik
router. Despite keeping up with the numerous updates, it seems almost every
one I own got hit in the last week.
Matthew Kaufman
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 11:13 AM Dennis Burgess via NANOG
wrote:
> I am looking for some
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 7:03 PM Jason Hellenthal
wrote:
> Mind pointing out where in the GDPR that it directly relates to these
> types of mail services ?
>
>
>
Like most regulations, it doesn’t call out a specific thing like email or
social networking sites or ecommerce. But it follows quite dir
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:56 PM Fletcher Kittredge wrote:
> What about my right to not have this crap on NANOG?
>
What about the likely truth that if anyone from Europe mails the list, then
every mail server operator with subscribers to the list must follow the
GDPR Article 14 notification requ
Section 3 of https://tunnelbroker.net/tos.php
It isn't "free". It may be included with a service that is currently
available for free, but they aren't providing free address space for an
unlimited period.
Matthew Kaufman
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:45 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
Exactly what Matt Harris says here... ULA is free. Space obtained from ARIN
is not. You want to discourage someone from doing the right thing, charge a
lot for that.
Matthew Kaufman
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:30 AM Matt Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Owen DeLong wr
I sent email there and to another contact I had at the time.
And I'm not going to break my users by turning IPv6 back on, so someone
else will need to work with them.
Matthew Kaufman
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:48 AM Lee wrote:
> On 11/16/16, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> > The good
The good news is that I reported this particular site as a problem two and
three years ago, both, and it isn't any worse.
Matthew Kaufman
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:29 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message , JORDI
> PALET M
> ARTINEZ writes:
> > I think it is not just a m
I fixed it (and Netflix) by turning off IPv6 for all my users... but any
chance this is a path MTU issue causing the apparent hang?
Matthew Kaufman
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:26 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <1479249003.3937.6.ca...@ns.five-ten-sg.com>, Carl Bying
n the process by now, for all types of
sources and destinations.
Matthew Kaufman
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:08 PM William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Bryan Fields
> wrote:
> > On 9/30/16 1:22 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> >> Note that you can't sell th
Personally, I'd think twice before putting a box that does unthrottled
reflection of ICMP packets to their claimed source anywhere, especially not
one with a well-known address.
Matthew Kaufman
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:01 AM James Greig wrote:
> On one of these lists around 6 mont
that anywhere in about 1/3rd of the
earth. When I travel, my IPSEC VPN extends that port to anywhere in the
world.
And?
Matthew Kaufman
-- Original Message --
From: "Spencer Ryan"
To: "Blair Trosper"
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: 6/6/2016 8:25:40 PM
Subj
If early adopter PI IPv6 was the same price as early adopter PI v4 space, my
wife would be totally on board with this solution.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Spencer Ryan wrote:
>
> Well if you have PI space just use HE's BGP tu
Good for them. For things like Apple TV you need to turn it off at the router
of course.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Cryptographrix wrote:
>
> The information I'm getting from Netflix support now is explicitly telling
> me to turn o
urn it off globally for the whole
house.
Thanks Netflix for helping move us forward here.
Matthew Kaufman
ps. Would still be helpful if the support techs could tell from the
error codes that the denied VPN is an IPv6 tunnel
-- Original Message --
From: "Matthew Kaufman"
To: &qu
y refuse to
escalate. Even if you tell them that you are essentially your own ISP.
So... where's the Netflix network engineer on the list who all of us can
send these issues to directly?
Matthew Kaufman
John Levine:
>
> Bonus question: is there any way to find out whether and where a
> number's been ported without spending telco level amounts of money?
> Free would be nice.
https://www.npac.com/the-npac/access/permitted-uses-of-user-data-contact-list
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
I come to the opposite conclusion - that this situation can persist with
apparently no business impact to either party shows that IPv6 is still
unnecessary.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Mar 13, 2016, at 7:31 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
>
> In the end, google has made a
How come we have real property "ownership"? It is nothing but a record of
invisible boundary lines on the surface of the earth, despite the earth and its
land area being a shared resource for its animal and plant inhabitants.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Feb 22, 201
or when they do something
>> properly bad.
>>
>> brandon
>
> Selling a service that is considered internet but does not deliver full
> internet access is generally considered properly bad.
>
> I would not do business with either company, since neither of them provide
> a full view.
>
> CB
I note that if IPv6 was actually important, neither one could have gotten away
with it for so long.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
Why do you care if there's a bridge? Seems you care about higher latency,
packet loss, lower reliability, etc. Measure what matters and act on that,
rather than trying to guess performance from link type.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:48 AM, Dave Tah
If all the complaining waits until Monday morning, why fix it over the weekend?
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> All in favor of 9x5 network operations say aye.
>
> Geeze.
>
> -Jim P.
and it being possible to support hundreds or
thousands of websites on a single IPv4 address, there's really no excuse.
Will this be different in the future? I sure hope so. But we're not
there yet.
Matthew Kaufman
> On Oct 7, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
> I don't have to. I'm sure some AG will do so soon enough.
There's always an optimist around.
Good luck with that.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Oct 7, 2015, at 7:00 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
> In message , Matthew Kaufman
> w
> rites:
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2015, at 5:01 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> Instead, the followup quest
esn't have and can't get an IPv4 address
isn't "on the Internet".
That may change in the future, but right now this is the web site's fault, not
your ISP's.
Wishing that the IPv6 transition had gone differently does not change reality.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
Cheaper than buying everyone TCAM
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> Much m ore than I'm willing to spend. ;-)
>
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.i
A /24 isn't that expensive yet...
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 7:32 AM, Justin Wilson - MTIN wrote:
>
> I was in a discussion the other day and several Tier2 providers were talking
> about the idea of adjusting their BGP filters to accept pref
ition?
And, as FB has shared, IPv6 is more performant for end users, and more
performant is more profitable
Isn't that also at least partially a consequence of your engineering
decision to use 464xlat?
Matthew Kaufman
Maybe Google should return the money you paid for access to their search engine
and associated free applications during the time it was down.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Sep 27, 2015, at 6:38 PM, Lyle Giese wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 09/27/15 16:16, Saku Yt
.
Let me be gentle about this. Why were you allowing 80/udp and 443/udp
in the first place into your production environment?
Which ISP do you run that blocks UDP by default? I'm curious, so I can
be sure I don't buy mislabeled "Internet" service from you.
Matthew Kaufman
If you can't hang 4k customers off a switch, why does IPv6 need so many bits
for the host portion?
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 12:54 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:40:44 -, Josh Moore said:
>
>&g
IT in those environments too, but that
doesn't make it so that nobody needs IPv4 addresses to deploy servers to
keep talking to these folks.
Matthew Kaufman
the random
consumer gear people bring in (cameras, printers, tablets, etc.) and see
how easy it is to get everything talking on an IPv6-only (no IPv4 at
all) network... including using IPv6 to do automatic updates and all the
other pieces that need to work. We're nowhere near ready for that.
Matthew Kaufman
On 7/15/2015 8:25 AM, John Levine wrote:
It would be nice if it were possible to implement BCP 38 in IPv6,
since this is the reason it isn't in IPv4.
Too bad the hazards of allowing people to use arbitrary source addresses
weren't known when IPv6 was designed.
Matthew Kaufman
My proposal to dump the rest of the v4 space this way was rejected as a policy
proposal already.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Jul 14, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
>
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I vote for a /24 lotto to get rid of the rest!
>
> That would
> On Jul 10, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
>>> On Jul 10, 2015, at 03:57 , Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 11:53 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 23:
> On Jul 9, 2015, at 11:53 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 23:33:25 -0700, Matthew Kaufman said:
>
>> One of the hopeful outcomes of IPv6 adoption was that an ISP could get
>> enough to last "forever" in a single transaction. But &
On 7/9/2015 6:31 PM, John Curran wrote:
On Jul 9, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Matthew Kaufman <mailto:matt...@matthew.at>> wrote:
On Jul 9, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Owen DeLong <mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote:
...
You are correct… In order for 20% of Google’s traffic to come from
IPv6 connec
enough to last "forever" in a single transaction. But "forever" isn't
very long at one /48 (or more) per customer.
Matthew Kaufman
; devices connected over IPv6.
>
> Owen
>
That doesn't follow at all.
One guy who has v6 and really loves youtube can account for most of it.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
What's excessive is >32 bits for a subnet.
No reason subnets should have been as big as they are. Bad for local forwarding
decisions, waste of bits, etc.
Nobody has a physical subnet technology that works for more than a few thousand
hosts anyway.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhon
eal concern, because
you and everyone else moved to a nearly 100% IPv6 Internet years ago.
Matthew Kaufman
Except for AfriNIC
And so we'll get to hear "the sky is falling" one last time
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Jun 27, 2015, at 2:57 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> the rirs have run out of their free source of short ints to rent to us.
> i am sure everyone
ticed that Android has no
support for DHCPv6, and a rather odd issue thread discussing it:
curious about the reasoning, for what is probably singular devices on a LAN ?
Lack of RDNSS support in Windows? That's the complication on my
IPv6-only network.
Matthew Kaufman
On 6/3/2015 4:56 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 2, 2015, at 4:08 PM, Matthew Kaufman <mailto:matt...@matthew.at>> wrote:
On 6/2/15 2:35 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 2, 2015, at 5:49 AM, Matthew Kaufman <mailto:matt...@matthew.at>> wrote:
On 6/1/2015 6:32 PM, Mark Andrews
available in stores this year to
reduce the search space to a manageable size
- hack the site where you get automatic updates from and use its logs
That's just off the top of my head
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Jun 2, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
>
> Tell
On 6/2/15 2:35 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 2, 2015, at 5:49 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
On 6/1/2015 6:32 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message
, Christopher Morrow writes:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Ca By wrote:
On Monday, June 1, 2015, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message
, Christopher
On 6/1/15 10:12 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <556d35df.8080...@matthew.at>, Matthew Kaufman writes:
On 6/1/2015 6:32 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message
com
, Christopher Morrow writes:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Ca By wrote:
On Monday, June 1, 2015, Mark Andrews wrot
in points, and probably a bunch of security nightmare
still waiting to be discovered. And it for sure isn't free.
Matthew Kaufman
On 6/1/2015 12:12 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
1) An all-IPv6 network inside, so the hosts can all talk to each other over
IPv6 without using (potentially overlapping copies of) RFC1918 space...
this point keeps coming up... I don'
asier to manage that full dual-stack
to every single host (because you pay all the cost of supporting v6
everywhere with none of the savings of not having to deal with the
ever-increasing complexity of continuing to use v4)
Matthew Kaufman
osted
services.
IMHO, forward-thinking application developers will eschew AWS in favor
of clouds that have dual-stack support and build dual-stack capable
applications.
Forward-thinking developers are using big clouds that have the resources
to enable IPv6 long before having IPv6 actually mat
opportunity in your future.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On May 31, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Sigh…
>
> IPv6 has huge utility.
>
> AWS’ implementation of IPv6 is brain-dead and mostly useless for most
> applications.
>
> I think if y
non-ham-radio traffic stays off the ham-band links.
Matthew Kaufman
+1
Th spectral split between down and up is real, has existed for a very long
time, and isn't a master of remapping.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 6:15 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> You should really learn how DOCSIS systems work.
http://wireless.fcc.gov/signal-boosters/faq.html
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Dec 15, 2014, at 6:59 PM, Ammar Zuberi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Although this might not apply to you in the US, anyone else thinking about
> trying this might want to check up on possi
Lots of other good reasons to oppose this (Comcast customers parking in your
driveway to get the service, etc.)
What would you tell AT&T if they installed a coin phone at every residential
outside demarc?
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Dec 11, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Owen DeLong
This is why I need to pull logs the next time I need to pay the FCC. There are
several rounds of redirects involved from clicking the payment button on the
FCC site to the final landing at pay.gov, and one of the last steps never
connects if IPv6 is enabled.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my
On 3/17/2014 11:43 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
Random IPv6 complaint of the day: redirects from FCC.gov to pay.gov
fail when clients have IPv6 enabled. Work fine if IPv6 is off. One
more set of client computers that should be dual-stacked are now
relegated to IPv4-only until someone remembers
"Patterns in Network Architecture"
You might not agree with it, but it does stimulate some thinking.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:48 AM, James Bensley wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> What is the single best book you have read on networking?
You're funny. What percentage of legacy holders have or will sign the LRSA do
you suppose?
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Aug 29, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
>
> Matthew Kaufman writes:
>
>> I look forward to the ARIN fee schedule f
I look forward to the ARIN fee schedule for legacy IPv4 holder RPKI
registrations.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Aug 28, 2014, at 8:28 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
>See "whois -r AS43239".
>
>The long term solution is to deploy RPKI and only
I guess you expect infrastructure to build itself for free?
Matthew Kaufman
Sent from my iPad
> On Aug 18, 2014, at 7:30 PM, Alejandro Acosta
> wrote:
>
>
>
> El 8/18/2014 12:23 PM, Aaron Hopkins escribió:
>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>>
>&g
On 8/6/2014 9:39 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
So is what I am proposing. In fact, I'm pretty sure my proposal is cheaper,
especially in the long run.
So build one already!
Matthew Kaufman
model?
In the meantime, I'd like to see the city where an ISP can buy as many
of the microducts as they want. I'd like to buy them all, please...
though I have no intention of running anything though them, as I'm an
investor in the local cable TV company.
Matthew Kaufman
Is that what I said?
Matthew Kaufman
On 7/21/2014 1:26 PM, Aaron wrote:
Do you have an example of a municipality that gives free internet
access to it's residents?
On 7/21/2014 2:26 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
I think the difference is when the municipality starts throwing in
free or h
I'd rather ask Adobe, since their peer-to-peer transport (and layers
above) has been dual-stacked since it was first designed.
Matthew Kaufman
On 7/21/2014 1:24 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Ask Skype just how easy it is to do that with a dual-stacked service.
Owen
On Jul 21, 2014, at
I think the difference is when the municipality starts throwing in free or
highly subsidized layer 3 connectivity "free with every layer 1 connection"
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Jul 21, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
>
> My power is pretty much alw
If you're an ISP and you can't afford even the highest price per IP on
that list, you have bigger problems than how much it costs to bring
Netflix traffic to your customers.
Matthew Kaufman
On 7/15/2014 7:58 AM, Brett Glass wrote:
Matt:
Here's the thing. With physical g
rate streaming, there's
often low overlap between the segments adjacent customers wish to
load... even if the content is not encrypted, or is encrypted with the
same DRM key for everyone.
Of course, the facts of the situation don't appear to matter really...
Matthew Kaufman
venture. You would undoubtedly learn a lot
about the costs Netflix has experienced while gaining the right to
stream (and now create) content that users want to see.
But since complaining about the latest thing is so much easier, I expect
we'll see a lot more of that instead of this s
My Apple TV appears to use IPv6, but since there's no UI for it (last I
checked) I had to disable SLAAC on that subnet to keep it from trying to use my
slow connection.
So in my book, "some" v6 support is actually worse than "none"
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhon
No, they just intercept whatever gear you do purchase before it gets to your
loading dock and then seal it back up with their modifications.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On May 13, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> I didn’t see the NSA telling us what we had t
, assigning a new address and
adding another firewall rule that didn't exist.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Apr 18, 2014, at 3:19 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:02 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:31 A
I think I got you to say "NAT"
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Timothy Morizot wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2014 7:52 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" wrote:
> >
> > While you're at it, the document can explain to admin
While you're at it, the document can explain to admins who have been burned,
often more than once, by the pain of re-numbering internal services at static
addresses how IPv6 without NAT will magically solve this problem.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
> On Apr 17, 2014, at
On 4/17/2014 1:45 PM, George Herbert wrote:
This is why listening to operators is important.
Why start now? After all, most of the useful input operators could have
provided would have been much more useful at the beginning.
Matthew Kaufman
It was reachable by hand-typed URL, but the machines trying to follow a
redirect from the FCC site during payment flow failed. Had to be brought back
online, so once it was determined that turning v6 off was sufficient, that was
the end if the debugging.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone
Windows 8 running Google Chrome as the browser.
Matthew Kaufman
On 3/17/2014 11:46 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
No Happy Eyeballs?
Perhaps also time to ditch XP and IE for something new as well.
-as
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Matthew Kaufman <mailto:matt...@matthew.at>&
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
