I have to recommend Linode in the UK, from my experience they have
their act together and their prices are reasonable.
Sam Moats
Circle Net
On 2014-02-18 12:50, Carlos Kamtha wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone could share some experiences with
server providers specifically in argentina
+1 Same feeling here.
Sam Moats
On 2014-02-06 16:22, Matthew Crocker wrote:
IMHO Cogent bandwidth is fine so long as it isn’t your only
bandwidth. Good, Cheap, Fast, Pick any two.
--
Matthew S. Crocker
President
Crocker Communications, Inc.
PO BOX 710
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
E: matt
This might be an interesting example of it's (mis)use.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_wiretapping_case_2004%E2%80%932005
Sam Moats
On 2013-12-30 11:16, Enno Rey wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 04:03:07PM +, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Dec 30, 2013, at 10:44 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Thanks to everyone who responded off list and on.
Sam Moats
On 2013-12-26 11:21, Josephson, Marcus wrote:
Start at slide 50:
This is documented further by the following Nanog presentation.
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Sunday/RAS_Traceroute_N47_Sun.pdf
-Marcus
and I want to
understand it
Thanks,
Sam Moats
On 2013-12-24 18:55, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2013-12-25 00:16, Sam Moats wrote:
Hello Nanog community,
I would like to enlist your help with understanding this latency I'm
seeing.
You are likely seeing the effects of asymmetric routing.
That's what I was thinking to.
[..]
Tracing route
That's the day we decided we needed better edge routers :-).. I watch a
modem pool infected with code red melt a cisco 3640. Had to throw a
Linux box in it's place while I waited for Cisco equipment.
Sam Moats
On 2013-12-17 09:54, Blake Dunlap wrote:
All I remember from the TNT days
I still have a soft spot for the Portmasters :-). We had rows of PM2's
with US robotics 33.6K sportster modems attached on 8mm tape racks.
Back when a town of 40K people could all connect through 2XT1's and
everyone was happy.
Sam Moats
On 2013-12-13 16:59, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec
I'm not sure about the current state of the industry it's been a while
since I was responsible for an access network. In the past we would keep
radius logs for about 4 months, these would include the username,IP
address and yes (to date myself) the caller id of the customer at the
time.
Sam
as close
to their customers as possible. As soon as you can drop that packet on
the floor the better. The giant zombie
bot armies are a pain to them to.
Thats all I can think of at 4am, I bet you can see why nobody would
ever appoint me big cheese of the internet.
Sam Moats
On 2013-11-13 00:57
There are good guys out there :-), and some are gorilla sized thats why
I
obfuscated the names in my response. No offense intended to the goood
ones.
Sam Moats
On 2013-11-13 05:48, Paul Bennett wrote:
I can't speak directly for them, as I'm not an official company
spokesperson
Don't have access to a normal PC right now but I agreed with this
approach so much that I'm typing a response on a 10 button pad.
Sam
On 2013-11-13 21:33, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Sam Moats s...@circlenet.us [1]
wrote:
about its long term benefit to the entire
with this approach and I'm open to ideas!
Thanks
Sam Moats
On 2013-11-12 16:58, Jonas Björklund wrote:
Hello,
We got often abuse reports on hosts that has been involved in DDOS
attacks.
We contact the owner of the host help them fix the problem.
I also would like to start send these abuse
contacts may be. I'll keep my restrictive
network settings for the time being.
Sam Moats
On 2013-11-12 20:43, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Sam Moats s...@circlenet.us wrote:
We used to use a small perl script called tattle that would parse
out the
/var/log/secure
Works for me from Nova, Level3 and Cogent.
Sam Moats
On 2013-10-09 12:17, Anthony Williams wrote:
Same. Works for me (WashDC/NoVA Area).
-Alby
On 10/9/2013 12:14 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
On 10/9/2013 9:00 AM, Blair Trosper wrote:
Can someone from Google Drive or Gmail contact me off
wrote:
--- s...@circlenet.us wrote:
From: Sam Moats s...@circlenet.us
There only options are to:
Disobey the law, unacceptable in my opinion
Close down services, noble but I need to eat and you probably want to
keep getting email
Compromise your principles and obey the law, the path often choosen
I believe you are correct, whatever technical hurdles we put in place
will be overcome by policy. As long as you can legally require me to
make my network intercept able for lawful purposes and are able to
prevent me from explaining these purposes to my users any security that
I would put in
True I shot from the hip, he does address the concerns later. I'm used
to implementing technologies to solve security problems. It's just damn
frustrating to have your hands tied in such a way that you can not and
that's the position that I see myself and most other network ops in.
Our
+1 I couldn't have said it any better.
Sam
On 2013-09-06 10:27, Naslund, Steve wrote:
The error in this whole conversation is that you cannot take it
back as an engineer. You do not own it. You are like an architect
or carpenter and are no more responsible for how it is used than the
I don't suggest a riot. I do believe in the rule of law, as a member of
a democracy
I need to accept that I will not always agree with the laws that are
enacted. If we
lived in China or somewhere else where there was no method to change
laws that were
unfair or unjust then yea I would support
This is part of the purpose behind the separation of powers between
executive, legislative and judicial.
William Pitt wrote Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of
those who possess it . As such constraints
are needed and in place.
We expect politician to cheat,lie,be stupid and self
opinion
Close down services, noble but I need to eat and you probably want to
keep getting email
Compromise your principles and obey the law, the path often choosen.
Sam Moats
On 2013-09-06 13:20, Nicolai wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 02:27:32PM +, Naslund, Steve wrote:
If everyone
the data in Mysql/Oracle but no-joy from
splunk so that I can use other tools on it easily.
+1 Free demo. You can download an eval version that is rate limited and
cripples itself after a fixed time.
-1 because The license costs are a bit high if your moving lots of data
through it
Sam Moats
On 2013-08-01 10:57, Sam Moats wrote:
Good Morning Nanog List,
I'm not normally the tinfoil hat type howerver I do want to know
other operators opinions on the FCC 477, 499 and the 214 license
requirements in light of the recent revealations.
Do you think the info is actually for the stated
Good Morning Nanog List,
I'm not normally the tinfoil hat type howerver I do want to know other
operators opinions on the FCC 477, 499 and the 214 license requirements
in light of the recent revealations.
Do you think the info is actually for the stated purposes? I'm trying
hard not to become
25 matches
Mail list logo
