It's obviously a nontrivial number otherwise why would Netflix block it? :)
Aled Morris wrote:
Maybe HE's IPv6 tunnel packets could be flagged with a destination option
(extension header field) that records the end-user's IPv4 tunnel endpoint
so geolocation could be done in the "old fashioned"
On Jul 26, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Jul 26, 2013, at 09:32 , Ryan Pavely para...@nac.net wrote:
I doubt that will ever happen. So it's time for me to update my arin
contact as this past weekend I got exactly that 2am porn call and it was
quite
I saw the same issue for getting OpenFlow stats, you need the new 8x10 or 100GE
cards afaict.
On Jan 14, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Jeroen Wunnink | Atrato IP Networks
jeroen.wunn...@atrato-ip.com wrote:
Sneaky hack: Slap an in+out rate limit on the vlan with high settings (i.e.
same as port/lag
It came back for me.. was doing txt messages between iPhones but now iMessage
but delayed.
On Nov 18, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Zaid Hammoudi zaid.hammo...@gmail.com wrote:
Seeing the same thing here in Edmonton AB.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-11-18, at 1:13 PM, Grant Ridder
Roland,
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 15, 2012, at 7:47 PM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
I know all about the forwarding capabilities of modern general-purpose CPUs,
ring-buffers, et. al. I know what is possible, and what isn't possible. And
please, no more from the Vyatta
On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
Ok, then let's take a step back, perhaps not permanently, and say DNS
resolution is only really useful for routers with more than just a
single default external route.
So DNS could be reduced to an inter-router only
On Jul 6, 2012, at 5:04 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Steven Noble sno...@sonn.com wrote:
On Jul 6, 2012, at 4:16 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
6) Puffed it up a little (worked with Cisco routers, but in the 7200
era
On Jun 15, 2012, at 6:53 PM, John Curran wrote:
On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:05 PM, Steven Noble wrote:
Part of the issue is how hard it is to update ARIN, they gladly take your
money but it's like pulling teeth to get anything updated and sometimes you
run out of teeth.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 15, 2012, at 3:53 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Scott Weeks wrote:
if arin would clamp down and revoke allocations that had provably
wrong/fraudulent whois data, we would probably get 50% IPv4 space back.
Part of the issue is how hard it is
On May 1, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Dominik Bay wrote:
Yesterday I received the following mail, from a CDN:
**snip**
Should your company decline this option, or if we do not have an agreement
regarding the settlement in place prior to May 31st 2012, Limelight Networks
will terminate the peering
10 matches
Mail list logo
