On May 24, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Paul Kelly :: Blacknight wrote:
>>>
>>> Just because I have operations in one region does not preclude me
>> from having operations
>>> in other regions. YMMV of course.
>>>
>>> /bill
>>
>> That was exactly my point, Bill... If you have operations in RIPE
Actually it's in Japanese. Nifty is one of the oldest (and at one time,
largest) access services in Japan. It's owned by owned by Fujitsu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nifty_Corporation
http://www.nifty.co.jp/english/
From here it looks like it's originated by AS2510, which is also Fujistsu.
So
Note the distinction in the new peering relationship requirement -- only direct
adjacencies with other transit-providing ASes count.
...or did that change happen some time ago and I'm just noticing it now (?)
TV
On Oct 13, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> --- a...@latency.net wrote:
> F
On Sep 26, 2011, at 1:11 AM, Manish Karir wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2011, at 11:31 PM, Tom Vest wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 25, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Manish Karir wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 25, 2011, at 6:31 PM, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
>>>
>>>&
On Sep 25, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Manish Karir wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2011, at 6:31 PM, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
>
>> Message: 9
>> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:37:17 +0300
>> From: Gadi Evron
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: "general badness" AS-based reputation system
>> Message-ID: <4e7f4aad.80
Hi Pascal,
A friendly fyi from a former China and HK surveyor and colocator:
Topologically, China and Hong Kong are not the same place at all; in fact for
some/many requirement-site pairings, Hong Kong may not not even be the closest
place to China.
I don't think it's possible to be both suff
On Mar 11, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I'm sorry, but some people are spending too much time denying
>> history. IPv6 has been largely ready for YEARS. Less than five years ago
>> a lot of engineers were declaring IPv6 dead and telling people that
>> double and triple NAT was the way o
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Feb 26, 2010, at 8:55 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Brandon Kim wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting, why is it causing quite a stir? Is it because they are trying
>>> to allocate a large
>>> pool of addresses?
>>
Sort of makes one wonder how the US came to have ubiquitous roads, or
power, or water distribution...
TV
On Jul 28, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
Lets put aside for a moment the conspiracy theories of government
intervention and
the telcos evil doing, IMHO there is a simple reason wh
9 matches
Mail list logo
