> on
> behalf of Mel Beckman mailto:m...@beckman.org>>
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 10:37 PM
> To: sur...@mauigateway.com<mailto:sur...@mauigateway.com>
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go
--- m...@beckman.org wrote:
From: Mel Beckman
This is discussing politics, not the "operational and
technical issues" of NANOG's charter.
---
BTW, I didn't mean it to be talking politics. He was
mentioned in the current discussion, I looked into a
li
behalf
of Mel Beckman mailto:m...@beckman.org>>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 10:37 PM
To: sur...@mauigateway.com<mailto:sur...@mauigateway.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go again.]
Before this snowball g
: sur...@mauigateway.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Eisenach & the FCC - was: [Re: Here we go again.]
Before this snowball gets any bigger, I would like to reiterate the previous
commenter calling for this present political discussion to move elsewhere.
Here's the NANOG AUP we've
Before this snowball gets any bigger, I would like to reiterate the previous
commenter calling for this present political discussion to move elsewhere.
Here's the NANOG AUP we've all agreed to:
NANOG Acceptable Use Policy
* Discussion will focus on Internet operational and technical issues as
--- jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca wrote:
The president elect chose Mr Eisenach to help fill jobs in FCC
and other telecom areas of govt.
That'll have impact on ops, if some of the papers are correct.
Briefly:
https://www.engadget.com/2016/
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 at 07:08 Dovid Bender wrote:
> Consumers can always chose with their wallet.
>
>
As long as you have options, which is the basic problem. There isn't real
alternative options.
Consumers can always chose with their wallet.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Jean-Francois Mezei <
jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> On 2016-11-09 17:54, William Herrin wrote:
>
> > I think this discussion is premature. We can hypothesize any number of
> > evils from the President Elect but
On 2016-11-09 17:54, William Herrin wrote:
> I think this discussion is premature. We can hypothesize any number of
> evils from the President Elect but until someone introduces a bill we
> can only tilt at windmills.
The president elect chose Mr Eisenach to help fill jobs in FCC and other
telec
https://youtu.be/Yi_2020LJQo
On Nov 10, 2016 18:27, "Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG"
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
> > There are plenty of reasons for thinking people to be terrified today.
> > I don't know why you've chosen to focus on such a small one. He
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> There are plenty of reasons for thinking people to be terrified today.
> I don't know why you've chosen to focus on such a small one. Here's a
> bigger one:
>
> http://bit.ly/2fTdmiG
Ok--so on a somewhat NANOG-related note...please tel
Thank you.
Get Outlook for iOS
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:06 PM -0500, "Job Snijders" wrote:
Hi all,
Please consider our Mail List Charter and Policy: http://nanog.org/list
The NANOG mailing list is established to provide a forum for the
exchange of technical information and the di
Hi all,
Please consider our Mail List Charter and Policy: http://nanog.org/list
The NANOG mailing list is established to provide a forum for the
exchange of technical information and the discussion of specific
implementation issues that require cooperation among network service
providers.
In ord
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> But ask yourself *now* what happens if you get these kinds of orders, so
> that you can give a reasoned answer.
>
> https://plus.google.com/+LaurenWeinstein/posts/TYxXkeQ2jPW
Hi Jay,
I think this discussion is premature. We can hypothesi
In message <1624203180.33527.1478724998723.javamail.zim...@baylink.com>,
"Jay R. Ashworth" wrote:
>The list is not the proper forum for a debate on this topic, and I'm not
>trying to start one.
>
>But ask yourself *now* what happens if you get these kinds of orders, so
>that you can give a reas
On 11/9/16 2:17 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
You're right, this is not the forum. So why are you abusing it?
I do think it's a fair thing to drop in everyone's lap though.
Something to think about, and consider, even if privately and to ones self.
--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Developme
You're right, this is not the forum. So why are you abusing it?
-mel beckman
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
>
> The list is not the proper forum for a debate on this topic, and I'm not
> trying to start one.
>
> But ask yourself *now* what happens if you get these kinds
To: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Here we go again.
The list is not the proper forum for a debate on this topic, and I'm not trying
to start one.
But ask yourself *now* what happens if you get these kinds of orders, so that
you can give a reasoned answer
The list is not the proper forum for a debate on this topic, and I'm not
trying to start one.
But ask yourself *now* what happens if you get these kinds of orders, so
that you can give a reasoned answer.
https://plus.google.com/+LaurenWeinstein/posts/TYxXkeQ2jPW
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashw
19 matches
Mail list logo
