On 2010/10/06 11:36 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Well, anyway, here's three more hijacked blocks that they (AS6517)
are routing. This is in addition to the 75 such blocks I've already
reported. (I guess that makes 78 hijacked blocks for them, in total.)
Out of curiosity, are you also
Well, anyway, here's three more hijacked blocks that they (AS6517)
are routing. This is in addition to the 75 such blocks I've already
reported. (I guess that makes 78 hijacked blocks for them, in total.)
Out of curiosity, are you also reporting these blocks to Spamhaus? I expect
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Heath Jones hj1...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, anyway, here's three more hijacked blocks that they (AS6517)
are routing. This is in addition to the 75 such blocks I've already
reported. (I guess that makes 78 hijacked blocks for them, in total.)
Out of curiosity
On Oct 7, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
in stabbing around today on the ARIN online website I noticed this:
ARIN provides access to a list of number resources in the database
which have no valid POC data. A POC handle is marked invalid by ARIN
staff when the POC has not
that via
smoke signal or something.
Well, anyway, here's three more hijacked blocks that they (AS6517)
are routing. This is in addition to the 75 such blocks I've already
reported. (I guess that makes 78 hijacked blocks for them, in total.)
198.99.245.0/24NET-198-99-245-0-1
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:52:26 CDT, Jorge Amodio said:
In the transition from the old IANA to FrICANNstein
Well, that monitor needed cleaning anynow... ;)
pgpnWwneWCOxL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sep 14, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
...
For example: Ron Guilmette has recently pointed out that notorious
spammer
Scott Richter has apparently hijacked *another* /16 block --
150.230.0.0/16.
I've dropped that block into various local blacklists, and in some
cases,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Chris Marlatt cmarl...@rxsec.com wrote:
Christopher Morrow wrote:
The end of the discussion was along the lines of: Yes, we know this
guy is bad news, but he always comes to us with the proper paperwork
and numbers, there's nothing in the current policy set to
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:05 AM, John Curran jcur...@arin.net wrote:
On Sep 14, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
...
For example: Ron Guilmette has recently pointed out that notorious
spammer
Scott Richter has apparently hijacked *another* /16 block --
150.230.0.0/16.
oh lokoie,
Christopher Morrow wrote:
The end of the discussion was along the lines of: Yes, we know this
guy is bad news, but he always comes to us with the proper paperwork
and numbers, there's nothing in the current policy set to deny him
address resources. Happily though he never pays his bill after
, September 14, 2009 9:40 AM
To: Chris Marlatt
Cc: John Curran; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Hijacked Blocks
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Chris Marlatt cmarl...@rxsec.com wrote:
Christopher Morrow wrote:
The end of the discussion was along the lines of: Yes, we know this
guy is bad news, but he
Morrow; Chris Marlatt
Cc: John Curran; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Hijacked Blocks
I haven't followed this entire string. Are you saying ARIN is repeatedly
handing out address space to known abusers? If that's the case then yes, some
form of policy should be worked on. If on the administrative
In Europe RIPE has a nice database. Hijacking is not possible since most
ISP's use filters based on RIPE Database.
Why ARIN don't use a similar tool ?
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Adrian Minta wrote:
Hijacking is not possible since most ISP's use filters based on RIPE
Database.
This is not true. Some filter, but most don't.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
If this is the case one could argue that ARIN should be reserving this
worthless address space to be used when they receive similar requests
in the future. There's no reason personX should get fresh, clean address
space when they make additional requests.
That implies some process
I haven't followed this entire string. Are you saying ARIN is repeatedly
handing out address space to known abusers? If that's the case then yes,
some form of policy should be worked on.
i might walk more slowly and with a bit less self-righteousness. this
is not a simple area. are we
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
I haven't followed this entire string. Are you saying ARIN is repeatedly
handing out address space to known abusers? If that's the case then yes,
some form of policy should be worked on.
i might walk more slowly and with a
1) not allocating to known offendors (even those who've been through
the court system and had judgements against them, which would be
following your proposed path)
[ i made no proposal. i was just a bit scared by the instant we need
to DO SOMETHING reaction. ] but what you say seems somewhat
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
1) not allocating to known offendors (even those who've been through
the court system and had judgements against them, which would be
following your proposed path)
[ i made no proposal. i was just a bit scared by the instant we
Be careful about what you are asking for.
i am not saying all is well here. i am just trying to move slowly and
pretend to think while on my first cuppa.
I agree with Randy that this is a reasonable approach.
In the transition from the old IANA to FrICANNstein and the separation
of numbers
20 matches
Mail list logo
