Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers

RFC 6177: This document obsoletes RFC 3177, updating its recommendations in the following ways: 1) It is no longer recommended that /128s be given out. While there may be some cases where assigning only a single address may be justified, a site, by definition,

Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:54:48 +0200, Ricardo Ferreira said: > Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed? > We are starting to plan the roll-out IPv6 to mobile subscribers (phones) I > am interesting in knowing the mask you use for the assignment; whether it > is /64 or /128. > >

Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers

* Baldur Norddahl > Den 22. jul. 2016 20.25 skrev "Ca By" : > > > Phones, as in 3gpp? If so, each phone alway gets a /64, there is > > no choice. > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6459 > > Here the cell companies are marketing their 4G LTE as an alternative > to DSL,

Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers

NOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> on behalf of Baldur Norddahl <baldur.nordd...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:10:41 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Den 22. jul. 2016 20.25 skrev "Ca By" <cb.li...@gmail.com>: > Phones, a

Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers

Den 22. jul. 2016 20.25 skrev "Ca By" : > Phones, as in 3gpp? If so, each phone alway gets a /64, there is no choice. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6459 Here the cell companies are marketing their 4G LTE as an alternative to DSL, Coax and fiber for internet access in

Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers

Good day, On 22 Jul 2016, at 10:54, Ricardo Ferreira wrote: > Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed? I am not, but I can answer from the consumer's point of view: > Basically a sole device will be connecting to the internet so I am > wondering if this rule is follwed.

Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers

On Friday, July 22, 2016, Ricardo Ferreira wrote: > Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed? > We are starting to plan the roll-out IPv6 to mobile subscribers (phones) I > am interesting in knowing the mask you use for the assignment; whether it

Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers

uly 22, 2016 12:57:58 PM To: Ricardo Ferreira Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ricardo, I know from previous discussions on this list that Android phones are looking for DHCPD leases and not /128's or /64's. From what I remember this is due to the current requirement

Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers

Ricardo, I know from previous discussions on this list that Android phones are looking for DHCPD leases and not /128's or /64's. From what I remember this is due to the current requirement for multiple ipv6 subnets for various applications (vpns among others) to function correctly. As a result

IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers

Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed? We are starting to plan the roll-out IPv6 to mobile subscribers (phones) I am interesting in knowing the mask you use for the assignment; whether it is /64 or /128. In RFC 3177, it says: 3. Address Delegation Recommendations The