IPv6 route annoucement

2014-08-07 Thread John York
Hoping to not start a war... We (a multi-homed end-user site) are finally getting IPv6-enabled Internet connectivity from one of our ISPs. In conversations regarding our BGP config, the ISP has balked at allowing us to advertise our ARIN-assigned /44, saying things like, "do you know how many addr

Re: IPv6 route annoucement

2014-08-07 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 No, it's not mis-sized. And no, you should advertise it all. I would advertise the /44 without reservation. Stuart Sheldon ACT USA AS22937 On 08/07/2014 01:58 PM, John York wrote: > Hoping to not start a war... > > We (a multi-homed end-user sit

Re: IPv6 route annoucement

2014-08-07 Thread Corey Touchet
Pretty strong reaction for a single prefix. Now if you said you wanted to advertise all your /64¹s that would be a different conversation. On 8/7/14, 2:58 PM, "John York" wrote: >Hoping to not start a war... > >We (a multi-homed end-user site) are finally getting IPv6-enabled Internet >connec

Re: IPv6 route annoucement

2014-08-07 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, John York wrote: Hoping to not start a war... We (a multi-homed end-user site) are finally getting IPv6-enabled Internet connectivity from one of our ISPs. In conversations regarding our BGP config, the ISP has balked at allowing us to advertise our ARIN-assigned /44, saying

RE: IPv6 route annoucement

2014-08-07 Thread John York
John -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Justin M. Streiner Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 1:56 PM To: North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: IPv6 route annoucement On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, John York wrote: > Hoping to not start a

Re: IPv6 route annoucement

2014-08-07 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , John York writes: > Hoping to not start a war... > > We (a multi-homed end-user site) are finally getting IPv6-enabled Internet > connectivity from one of our ISPs. In conversations regarding our BGP > config, the ISP has balked at allowing us to advertise our ARIN-assigned > /44, sa

Re: IPv6 route annoucement

2014-08-07 Thread Owen DeLong
It may also help to point out to them that under ARIN policy, if you need more than a single /48, you will get at least a /44. ARIN does not issue non-nibble-aligned blocks any more. You can get /12, /16, /20, /24, /28, /32, /36, /40, /44, /48, but you can't get a /45, /46, or /47. IMHO this