Owen DeLong writes:
> I fully expect the record to be placed soon and it looks like that
> is the last remaining hurdle. Once that is done, I will pay my dues.
There have been records in the zone for ages. I don't have a
problem with you calling out our oversight on a public mailing
On Feb 7, 2011, at 3:23 PM, John van Oppen wrote:
I'd be happy if https://newnog.org/join.php loaded a page instead of an
SSL error.
>
> Good to see that you have working v6 connectivity. :)This is being
> worked on now, it is ironically only broken in v6.
>
>
> John
>
Cool.
- Original Message -
> >>>I'd be happy if https://newnog.org/join.php loaded a page instead
> >>>of an SSL error.
>
> Good to see that you have working v6 connectivity. :) This is being
> worked on now, it is ironically only broken in v6.
>
>
> John
Ahhh... that makes sense :-) Will che
>>>I'd be happy if https://newnog.org/join.php loaded a page instead of an SSL
>>>error.
Good to see that you have working v6 connectivity. :)This is being worked
on now, it is ironically only broken in v6.
John
No SSL errors here using Chrome, IE, or Firefox.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the
>> web site to do so
>> on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
>>
>> Owen
>
> I'd be happy if htt
- Original Message -
> I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the
> web site to do so
> on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
>
> Owen
I'd be happy if https://newnog.org/join.php loaded a page instead of an SSL
error.
-Randy
Apologies to Mike,
It was not my intention to brow-beat him publicly. Indeed, I acknowledge
that he has the problem well in hand and is actively working on resolving
the issue.
My only intent was to point out to the person who claimed an ip6.arpa
record and a host which had an IPv6 address on its
We all know that many people have no IPv6 connectivity. But I've only heard
about future Internet-users without IPv4 connectivity... I didn't realize it
was reality for Owen today.
(Even my IPv6 phone via T-Mobile has NAT64 connectivity to www.newnog.org.)
Cheers,
-Benson
On Feb 7, 2011, at
[Reply-To: set to -futures@, as I don't think this is an operational issue.]
On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Reaching the web site requires more than an ip6.arpa record.
>
> It requires an record:
In the e-mail to which you are replying (and top-posting, no less :), Mike
Reaching the web site requires more than an ip6.arpa record.
It requires an record:
baikal:owen (68) ~ % host -t www.newnog.org
2011/02/07 13:51:23
www.newnog.org has no record
And it requires the host answer on port 80 at its
---
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:40:41PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the
> > web site ot do so on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
Yes it does. 2001:4970::::2 I'm bugging the powers-tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Majdi S. Abbas [mailto:m...@latt.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 1:29 PM
> To: Owen DeLong
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: Membership model
>
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:40:41PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > I'll h
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:40:41PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the
> web site ot do so on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
I noticed that too, but shoot, I'm not even sure their
host supports it.
Besides, you'd still be
On Feb 7, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the web site
> to do so
> on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
http://newnog.org/wg.php
I'm sure the technical WG will be happy to hear you're volunteering.
--
kris
I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the web site to
do so
on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
Owen
15 matches
Mail list logo
