On Thursday, January 12, 2012 12:06:42 PM Jay Ashworth
wrote:
I'm not saying you need the whole 19mbps (though,
remember here, we are not talking about Additional
Carriage; we are talking about *being the only way
people can see that game* -- and my example was the
Super Bowl).. but unless
On (2012-01-11 17:45 -0500), Justin M. Streiner wrote:
If multicast is used it shouldn't take 150pbps, it should be much lower.
That could be one of the things that helps spur v6 adoption -
multicast being somewhat less of an afterthought :)
While v4 multicast works, and delivering video
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, Saku Ytti wrote:
This is misguided, IPV6 does no magic to help scale multicast to Internet
scale compared to IPV4.
Actually, IPv6 embedded RP improves scalability over IPv4 MSDP peering and
ASM.
--
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp:
On (2012-01-15 09:47 -1000), Antonio Querubin wrote:
This is misguided, IPV6 does no magic to help scale multicast to Internet
scale compared to IPV4.
Actually, IPv6 embedded RP improves scalability over IPv4 MSDP
peering and ASM.
Unfortunately that does exactly nothing to help with
On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
Unfortunately that does exactly nothing to help with Internet scale.
Now scaling for your local environment embedded RP might be beneficial, but
actual practical applications where you need ASM are very few.
Most vendors took out hardware
On Jan 15, 2012 1:40 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
Unfortunately that does exactly nothing to help with Internet scale.
Now scaling for your local environment embedded RP might be beneficial,
but
actual practical applications
It will be at least 9-10 years before Google could bid. I think the TV
networks get a chance to renew before anyone else can even bid. Unless the
NFL decides to do something with the NFL Network games they are likely SOL.
ESPN renewed their MNF contract through 2021.
In this week's CES coverage on Marketplace, venture capitalist Mark Suster
of GRP Partners opines that Google will bid on the broadcast rights to MNF
within the next 5 years.
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/ces-2012/future-television-way-we-watch
Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:41:15 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live 1080p HD with very close to zero
dropouts to 25-30 million viewers for 4 hours straight every week, yet?
Depends how much compression you use. :)
pgprMJ4o8lC7c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 19:11, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:41:15 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live 1080p HD with very close to zero
dropouts to 25-30 million viewers for 4 hours straight every week, yet?
Depends how much compression
Smart tv's should help, no?
- Original Message -
From: Darius Jahandarie [mailto:djahanda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 08:04 PM
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Monday Night Footbal -- on Google?
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 19:11, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:19:57 GMT, George Fitzpatrick said:
Smart tv's should help, no?
Only so much.
No matter what they show on CSI about enhancing video, if that stream got
compressed so the football Tim Tebow just threw is just a brown ellipse,
there;s no legitimate way to put the seams back
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:32 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:19:57 GMT, George Fitzpatrick said:
Smart tv's should help, no?
Only so much.
No matter what they show on CSI about enhancing video, if that stream got
compressed so the football Tim Tebow just threw is
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Dorr wrote:
But the TV should only be receiving one stream at a time, unless there
is pip. Each stream would probably be around 5mbps.
If multicast is used it shouldn't take 150pbps, it should be much lower.
That could be one of the things that helps spur v6
Darius Jahandarie wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 19:11, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:41:15 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live 1080p HD with very close to zero
dropouts to 25-30 million viewers for 4 hours straight every week, yet?
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 21:40, Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com wrote:
Not sure where/what you're talking about, but here in the U.S.A, Dish
Network and DirecTV seem to put a max of 7 MPEG 4 HD channels on a
*transponder*.
http://www.satelliteguys.us/thelist/index.php?page=sub
--Michael
- Original Message -
From: Philip Dorr tagn...@gmail.com
But the TV should only be receiving one stream at a time, unless there
is pip. Each stream would probably be around 5mbps.
I believe you're an optimist.
Weekly football is probably the second most important thing on a TV
- Original Message -
From: Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com
Not sure where/what you're talking about, but here in the U.S.A, Dish
Network and DirecTV seem to put a max of 7 MPEG 4 HD
channels on a *transponder*.
http://www.satelliteguys.us/thelist/index.php?page=sub
Yup; at
Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com
Not sure where/what you're talking about, but here in the U.S.A, Dish
Network and DirecTV seem to put a max of 7 MPEG 4 HD
channels on a *transponder*.
19 matches
Mail list logo
