Nokia you want the G6 XS-010XR-P line and the 230 enclosure
UBNT also has XG and GPON PoE devices, you can dual power them from their USB +
24V passive - Their XGS unit does not do POE.
I don’t recommend using the GPON SFP modules, the device they go in may not
signal to you enough information
Calix just announced this today.
GPR4001XH
XGS pon with 4 poe ports. One 10G three 1G.
https://eng2e.seismic.com/i/SKeXK2oT6LIeLYiJ9M34v3KmSECpxeMqY6LBELSMD5NrHbPHQMax6LgQq___VX3rmzgEL5I1STXPLUSSIGNGdM4fR3p15v670b1ZmzzJJPLjtUpPdMS8EQUALSIGN
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 9:31 AM Chris Hills wrote:
>
On 19/06/2024 16:35, Brandon Martin wrote:
I believe many of these were resolved with XGSPON, but you should
consult your OLT vendor. At minimum, expect to potentially into a
situation where you cannot bulk upgrade the ONT firmware from the OLT
over the OMCI but instead have to do it with L3 c
pect to potentially into a
> situation where you cannot bulk upgrade the ONT firmware from the OLT
> over the OMCI but instead have to do it with L3 connectivity to each ONT.
Sure there were issues, but the OMCI specification got updates and BBF also
tests ONTs
https://www.broadband-for
On 6/19/24 09:50, daveb wrote:
You could try a GPON/XGSPON ONT SFP (SFU mode provisioning) in your
favorite PoE switch/router.
This is probably your best bet. I think basically everybody has a "ONT
on a stick" in their catalog now for both XGSPON and GPON. Then provide
your own switch that
On 6/19/24 09:30, Karsten Thomann via NANOG wrote:
As the ONT should all be using OMCI, any reason not using Zhone ONT with
another OLT Vendor to avoid the CLI issue?
Or are they that special and don't work with other OLT?
I know with GPON, there are some nuances in the OMCI that cause frequent
You could try a GPON/XGSPON ONT SFP (SFU mode provisioning) in your
favorite PoE switch/router.
On 6/19/2024 5:55 AM, chiel via NANOG wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for a for a vendor that has XGS-PON/GPON ONT's with PoE
ports (preferable 4).
Adtran and Calix don't seem any model that has PoE.
Calix GPR8802x is the only Calix XGSPON capable device that I know of with
POE, but it's a full 1RU business oriented device and not really designed
(or priced) for standard residential CPE.
380W total, up to 60W per port spread across 6x Gigabit ports, and 2x 2.5G
ports
Rest is a 10G WAN SFP+ (f
Yes, Nokia has some ONTs with PoE, but are not really the requested size.
I'm only aware about the U-090CP-P and the bigger U-00160CP-P, but they have 9
Ports or more...
Not aware about any standard G- or XS- residential ONT with PoE..
I've never used the U series ONT, so no real life
I think Nokia has a few ONT's with POE
Thank you
Travis Garrison
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of
chiel via NANOG
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 4:55 AM
To: list
Subject: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs
Hello,
I'm looking for a for a vendor that has XGS-PON/
Hello,
I'm looking for a for a vendor that has XGS-PON/GPON ONT's with PoE
ports (preferable 4).
Adtran and Calix don't seem any model that has PoE.
Zhone (DZS) has one but we don't like the CLI/config, to complex.
Huawei also has PoE models but we prefer not to use them.
Anybody knows any ot
I know that this list is normally big picture Internet-centric, but I have a
last-mile question for the group.
Have you seen any Passpoint-certified residential ONTs? The use case is to
provide cellular offload over our last-mile fiber infrastructure. Often these
projects are pitched towards
On 14/1/22 2:45 am, Dave Taht wrote:
Thx. I started a thread over on the cerowrt-devel mailing list on this,
it was cool to find several linux based SFPs worth playing with, Finding
a set of "common" ONTs worth configuring in a way more suited for
an fq_codel'd router (and espec
ing it would hold true with XG/s/PON, NGPON, etc.
>
> The way at least my gear (Adtran) works is that you configure
> shaping/policing as part of the provisioned service. That information
> is communicated to the ONTs via the OMCI.
>
> AFAIK, the ONT enforces admission control
you configure
shaping/policing as part of the provisioned service. That information
is communicated to the ONTs via the OMCI.
AFAIK, the ONT enforces admission control on the upstream (and
coordinates for timeslot assignments with the OLT since upstream
oversubscription is supported and common
I would have to imagine any QOS/traffic shaping is done in the OMCI and
hence would probably be in the GPON spec, g.984. I would look there.
Just guessing it would hold true with XG/s/PON, NGPON, etc.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, O
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:27 PM Josh Luthman
wrote:
>
> That's usually an OMCI control thing on the OLT (traffic shaping, qos). Do
> you have a specific question in mind?
My dream, of course, is fq_codel (nowadays, sch_cake) on every
potential bottleneck link. FQ for essentially zero latency f
That's usually an OMCI control thing on the OLT (traffic shaping, qos). Do
you have a specific question in mind?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:04 PM Dave Taht wrote:
> Does anyone have any insig
Does anyone have any insight as to the OS and overall capabilities of
various ONT's? Traffic shaping/QoS and statistics?
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:01 PM Shawn L via NANOG wrote:
>
> Yes. In our scenario the ONT is basically an ethernet bridge and provides a
> SIP end-point for calls. There ar
lecom@nanog.org] On Behalf
Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:18 AM
To: 'Pete@TCC'; Jean-Francois Mezei; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: FTTH ONTs and routers
FYI, Calix has GPON support for the 836GE ONT on the E7 today, and it
will be supported in GPON mode in Release 9.0 on
@nanog.org
Subject: Re: FTTH ONTs and routers
There are many ONTs out there with various abilities. I can only
comment on what I deploy, and what various telcos deploy that I am
familiar with.
A few years ago, all of our AE and GPON ONTs were deployed as bridges.
Port 1 was generally an
There are many ONTs out there with various abilities. I can only
comment on what I deploy, and what various telcos deploy that I am
familiar with.
A few years ago, all of our AE and GPON ONTs were deployed as bridges.
Port 1 was generally an Internet VLAN, and port 2,3,4 were IPTV VLANs
- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Tinka"
> On Thursday, May 15, 2014 07:24:33 PM Aled Morris wrote:
> > I notice Cisco's new ME4600 ONT's come in two flavors,
> > one (the "Residential GateWay") with all the bells and
> > whistles that you'd expect in an all-in-one home router
> > (voice
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 07:24:33 PM Aled Morris wrote:
> I notice Cisco's new ME4600 ONT's come in two flavors,
> one (the "Residential GateWay") with all the bells and
> whistles that you'd expect in an all-in-one home router
> (voice ports, small ethernet switch, wifi access point)
> and anoth
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 07:11:20 PM Jean-Francois Mezei
wrote:
> Can anyone confirm whether ONTs generally have routing
> (aka: home router that does the PPPoE or DHCP and then
> NAT for home) capabilities?
I know of a well-known vendor coming out with a new OLT that
supports bot
Calix's indoor ONT (836GE) come with RG functionality by default:
http://www.calix.com/systems/p-series/calix_residential_services_gateways.html
but they also have a software load for their 700GE-series ONTs:
http://www.calix.com/news/press_releases/press_release_20130611.html
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
Are there examples where a telco has deployed ONTs with the router
built-in and enabled ? Or would almost all FTTH deployments be made with
any routing disabled and the ONT acting as a pure ethernet bridge ?
Can we please stop equating FTTH and
Calix makes a number of ONTs some with residential gateways, some that are
just bridges
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Aled Morris wrote:
> I notice Cisco's new ME4600 ONT's come in two flavors, one (the
> "Residential GateWay") with all the bells and whistles tha
Many thanks for the answers so far.
On 14-05-15 13:35, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
>>The assertion that ONTs have built-in routing capabilities has been
>>challenged.
>
> By who?
A rather large company in Canada whose name contains the last name of
the inventor of the Telephone
At 01:11 PM 15/05/2014, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
It had been my impression that ONTs, like most other consumer modems,
came with built-in router capabilities (along with ATA for voice).
The assertion that ONTs have built-in routing capabilities has been
challenged.
By who?
Can anyone
that looks a lot more basic
and is likely to be deployed as a bridge.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/me-4600-series-multiservice-optical-access-platform/datasheet-c78-730446.html
Aled
On 15 May 2014 18:11, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
>
> It had been my impression t
Jean-Francois,
I've seen it done both ways, and _usually_ newer ONTs will have the
capacity even if its not used. Having said that there is no real
standardization between vendors other than the physical layer (and even
that's not great) so what's common for one vendor may well be
On May 15, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei
wrote:
>
> It had been my impression that ONTs, like most other consumer modems,
> came with built-in router capabilities (along with ATA for voice).
>
> The assertion that ONTs have built-in routing capabilities has be
It had been my impression that ONTs, like most other consumer modems,
came with built-in router capabilities (along with ATA for voice).
The assertion that ONTs have built-in routing capabilities has been
challenged.
Can anyone confirm whether ONTs generally have routing (aka: home router
that
34 matches
Mail list logo
