On Jun 26, 2013, at 4:40 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:06:10 -0400, "Justin M. Streiner" said:
>>> We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
>>> mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though their
>>> relationship w
On 6/26/2013 5:11 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
Thanks everyone.
It sounds like (a) customer needs to clarify contract terms with Paetec, and
(b) unless they have an ongoing relationship, the best long-term plan is to
renumber.
I did check reg dates on the blocks, and it is much more recent than the
c
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>> It's got to be PA space. Paetec isn't in a position to assign PI space.
>>
>>
>> No distinction is drawn between PA and PI for ARIN-region
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:06:10 -0400, "Justin M. Streiner" said:
> > We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
> > mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though their
> > relationship with Paetec ended a long time ago.
> >
> > Is this a common situa
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, William Herrin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
It's got to be PA space. Paetec isn't in a position to assign PI space.
No distinction is drawn between PA and PI for ARIN-region address
space assigned prior to ARIN's inception in 1997. That's "le
Abley
Cc: Adam Greene; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Paetec PI space?
f the assignment predated ARIN, then its not clear if current ARIN policy is
applicable.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:18:54PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2013-06-26, at 13:52, "Adam Greene" wrote:
>
>
f the assignment predated ARIN, then its not clear if current ARIN policy
is applicable.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:18:54PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2013-06-26, at 13:52, "Adam Greene" wrote:
>
> > We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
> > mid-90's
>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> It's got to be PA space. Paetec isn't in a position to assign PI space.
No distinction is drawn between PA and PI for ARIN-region address
space assigned prior to ARIN's inception in 1997. That's "legacy"
address space.
Since the end of filteri
Jon,
On Jun 26, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>>> We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
>>> mid-90's
>> They should plan to renumber out of that space in the very near future.
It'd be nice for routing system hygiene, but there probably is no requirement
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though their
relationship with Paetec ended a long time ago.
Is this a common situation? Does the customer risk hav
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
> We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
> mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though their
> relationship with Paetec ended a long time ago.
>
> Is this a common situation?
It was back i
Joe,
On Jun 26, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
>> We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
>> mid-90's
> I think it's correct to say that the only entities that can assign PI IPv4
> space are RIRs and the IANA.
Nope. Historically, there was no distinction
On 2013-06-26, at 13:52, "Adam Greene" wrote:
> We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
> mid-90's
I think it's correct to say that the only entities that can assign PI IPv4
space are RIRs and the IANA. If I'm right, what you're talking about is PA
space, rega
We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though their
relationship with Paetec ended a long time ago.
Is this a common situation? Does the customer risk having that space
reclaimed by Paetec at some point,
On Jun 26, 2013, at 1:52 PM, "Adam Greene" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
> mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though their
> relationship with Paetec ended a long time ago.
>
>
>
> Is this a common situ
Hi,
We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though their
relationship with Paetec ended a long time ago.
Is this a common situation? Does the customer risk having that space
reclaimed by Paetec at
16 matches
Mail list logo