On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:12:34PM -0800,
Peter Eckersley p...@eff.org wrote
a message of 86 lines which said:
To date, the leading role the US has played in this infrastructure
has been fairly uncontroversial [sic and re-sic] because America
is seen as a trustworthy arbiter and a
I would strongly suggest that operators work with their legal
departments to endorse this paper by Crocker and others.
If other ISP organizations (such as say MAAWG) come out with
something, other operators could sign on to that as well.
The EFF petition has way too much propaganda and far less
: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship
I would strongly suggest that operators work with their legal
departments to endorse this paper by Crocker and others.
If other ISP organizations (such as say MAAWG) come out with
something, other
/files/news/MAAWG_US_Congress_S968-HR3261_Comments_2011-12.pdf
Mike
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [ops.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 December 2011 05:12
To: Hal Murray
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against
4 matches
Mail list logo
