On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 7:37 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> We actually had an IETF "Help Desk" at NANOG 63 (San Antonio, 2015) and
> NANOG 64 or 65 ―
> https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2015/01/
> chris-grundemann-nanog-63-talking-bcop-ietf-and-more/ and
> https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2014/1
> We actually had an IETF "Help Desk" at NANOG 63 (San Antonio, 2015) and
> NANOG 64 or 65 ―
> https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2015/01/chris-grundemann-nanog-63-talking-bcop-ietf-and-more/
> and
> https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2014/11/operators-and-the-ietf-update-from-ietf-91/
>
> We
etings
> in a row, and I know the board is giving them a lot of thought, and I’m
> just trying to support those efforts from outside the board.
>
>
>
> Maybe this should have gone to the members mailing list, but I couldn’t
> find one.
>
>
>
> Lee
>
>
>
>
>
>
From: Tom Beecher
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 10:53 AM
To: Howard, Lee
Cc: Warren Kumari ; nanog
Subject: Re: NANOG 90 Attendance?
This message is from an EXTERNAL SENDER - be CAUTIOUS, particularly with links
and attachments.
Maybe this should have gone to the members mailing list
should have gone to the members mailing list, but I couldn’t
> find one.
>
>
>
> Lee
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* NANOG *On
> Behalf Of *Warren Kumari
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 11, 2024 2:50 PM
> *To:* Mike Hammett
> *Cc:* nanog
> *Subject:* Re: NANOG 90
ard is giving them a lot of thought, and I'm just trying to support
those efforts from outside the board.
Maybe this should have gone to the members mailing list, but I couldn't find
one.
Lee
From: NANOG On Behalf
Of Warren Kumari
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 2:50 PM
To: Mike
None of the conversation was about COVID protocols.
Lowered in person attendance because of *individual concerns about health
risks* was mentioned. The conversation then went sideways into public
health policy and definitions, which absolutely doesn't belong on the list.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 7
mhammett> This seems more ideological and not overly appropriate for
mhammett> NANOG.
No, covid protocols are something that every conference that is serious
about inclusion should be *very* concerned with.
Saying that NANOG doesn't care about this says that NANOG can't be
bothered to make an eff
)
Subject: Re: NANOG 90 Attendance?
On 11/02/2024 7:56 a.m., Tom Beecher wrote:
> Yup. Post pandemic, the unfortunate hotel situation, and a non-zero
> number of companies still have tight travel budgets.
>
> It's been slowly creeping back though.
Except we aren't really "
On 13/02/2024 7:39 p.m., Tom Beecher wrote:
Except we aren't really "post-pandemic" despite the claims that we
are.
"post-pandemic" the way that I used it was to mean "after the COVID
lockdowns, with close to normal travel gatherings".
It certainly wasn't intended to be commentary
>
> Except we aren't really "post-pandemic" despite the claims that we are.
>
"post-pandemic" the way that I used it was to mean "after the COVID
lockdowns, with close to normal travel gatherings".
It certainly wasn't intended to be commentary on the current state of
COVID, if it's referred to a
On 11/02/2024 7:56 a.m., Tom Beecher wrote:
Yup. Post pandemic, the unfortunate hotel situation, and a non-zero
number of companies still have tight travel budgets.
It's been slowly creeping back though.
Except we aren't really "post-pandemic" despite the claims that we are.
As long as COVID
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 8:31 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I haven't been to a NANOG meeting in a while. While going through the
> attendee list for NANOG 90 to try to book meetings with people, I noticed a
> lack of (or extremely minimal) attendance by several organizations that
> have traditionally
n Hamel"
Cc: "Mike Hammett" , "nanog"
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 7:56:28 AM
Subject: Re: NANOG 90 Attendance?
Yup. Post pandemic, the unfortunate hotel situation, and a non-zero number of
companies still have tight travel budgets.
It's been slowly creeping ba
Yup. Post pandemic, the unfortunate hotel situation, and a non-zero number
of companies still have tight travel budgets.
It's been slowly creeping back though.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 8:44 AM Ryan Hamel wrote:
> Mike,
>
> The numbers have not bounced back to pre-pandemic levels, and it doesn't
Mike,
The numbers have not bounced back to pre-pandemic levels, and it doesn't help
that NANOG 90 has had some hotel issues.
Ryan
From: NANOG on behalf of Mike
Hammett
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 5:31:02 AM
To: nanog
Subject: NANOG 90 Attendance?
Cautio
16 matches
Mail list logo