On 20 May 2010, at 13:06, Net wrote:
> Are there any policies set by internet registries and/or transit providers
> today that prohibits organizations from using a Partially used IP Block
> allocated in one region say AP through APNIC to be comissioned and Propagated
> in another region such a
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
LoL... In my experience, the guys that are getting money from you will
route what you want routed unless they have reason to believe you are
not legitimately entitled to route it.
Like spammers buying IPs from RIPE region LIRs such as jump.ro, and then
On May 20, 2010, at 9:13 PM, John Lee wrote:
> Some pseudo random thoughts and questions? (my BGP is rusty.)
>
> 1. Does it violate your AUP with APNIC?
>
Not if he has infrastructure in the remote location and infrastructure and/or
HQ in APNIC region.
> 2. If the larger routing prefix is fro
Some pseudo random thoughts and questions? (my BGP is rusty.)
1. Does it violate your AUP with APNIC?
2. If the larger routing prefix is from APNIC will your upstream in the EMEA
region filter or black hole the sub prefix since it is from APNIC and not RIPE
and would appear to be a hijacked blo
; Cc: George Bonser; nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Partial Use Of one Regions IP Block in another
>>
>> On 2010-05-20 09:36, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> > We're scraping the bottom of the barrel for IPv4 space these days.
>> > It is what it is, and it's only
> -Original Message-
> From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joe...@bogus.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 10:05 AM
> To: Owen DeLong
> Cc: George Bonser; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Partial Use Of one Regions IP Block in another
>
> On 2010-05-20 09:36, Owen DeLong w
On 2010-05-20 09:36, Owen DeLong wrote:
We're scraping the bottom of the barrel for IPv4 space these days.
It is what it is, and it's only going to get worse in IPv4. Time to go
to IPv6.
in ipv6 we're using our arin /32 in all regions where we appear...
joel
Owen
On May 20, 2010, at 9:14 AM, George Bonser wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 7:37 AM
>> To: Net
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Partial Use Of one Regions IP
> -Original Message-
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 7:37 AM
> To: Net
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Partial Use Of one Regions IP Block in another
>
>
> You state "Obv, the best approach...".
There is absolutely nothing wrong with an organization getting all of it's
IP resources world wide from a single registry if they prefer to do so.
There is no policy prohibiting this in any registry. The policies are
designed to prevent "registry shopping" by organizations with neither
infrastruct
From my experience with the provider I have, when I try to acquire
IP space to let's say on the RIPE side (Im on the LACNIC side) for
reasons like greater visibility (some how). I believe that RIPE
requires me to have a company registered on the EMEA side or have my
provider place it for me. but
11 matches
Mail list logo
