On March 2, 2015 at 13:21 na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) wrote:
> The most important point is yes, that no one cares. If people wanted it, it
> would be sold to them. End. of. story.
That presumes you can predict what will be sold tomorrow, which is
more what this discussion is about.
If pe
Well, it's not quite that simple. I run a global network so I buy lots of
services in lots of countries and areas so I can tell you what out there even
though I don't see FIOS commercials on my local TV channels, we are quite aware
of the capabilities of FIOS and its competitors. I have lots o
"Naslund, Steve" writes:
>>>From a Verizon press release last summer, all FIOS speeds are now symmetric.
>>>
>>> And no one cares. I don't even see Verizon commercials crowing about
>>> how great it is to have symmetry. If customers loved it that much
>>> don't you think they would market t
>>From a Verizon press release last summer, all FIOS speeds are now symmetric.
>>
>> And no one cares. I don't even see Verizon commercials crowing about
>> how great it is to have symmetry. If customers loved it that much
>> don't you think they would market that way?
>You must not get ou
"Naslund, Steve" writes:
>>From a Verizon press release last summer, all FIOS speeds are now symmetric.
>
> And no one cares. I don't even see Verizon commercials crowing
> about how great it is to have symmetry. If customers loved it that
> much don't you think they would market that way?
Y
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 02:41:30PM -0500, Fletcher Kittredge wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> > The most important point is yes, that no one cares. If people wanted it,
> > it would be sold to them. End. of. story.
>
>
> I will repeat myself, speaking very slowly
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> The most important point is yes, that no one cares. If people wanted it,
> it would be sold to them. End. of. story.
I will repeat myself, speaking very slowly. Please see original message for
citations.
Verizon has eight million FIOS custo
On 03/02/2015 02:19 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
The backend is still symmetric. It's still something like 1.25 gigs up and 2.5
gigs down. You can only beat that going to AE.
Truth is, once the user is achieving what they consider to be acceptable
performance they don't care if it is symmetric
"NANOG list"
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 1:19:29 PM
Subject: RE: Symmetry, DSL, and all that
>The backend is still symmetric. It's still something like 1.25 gigs up and 2.5
>gigs down. You can only beat that going to AE.
>
>
Truth is, once the user is achieving w
>The backend is still symmetric. It's still something like 1.25 gigs up and 2.5
>gigs down. You can only beat that going to AE.
>
>
Truth is, once the user is achieving what they consider to be acceptable
performance they don't care if it is symmetric or not.
>
>
>Not a very informative discu
Damn A key... I mean asymmetric.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett"
To: "NANOG list"
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 1:00:04 PM
Subject: Re: Symmetry, DSL, and all that
The backend is still symmetric. It's still something like 1.25 gigs up and 2.5
gigs down. You can only beat that going to AE.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Fletcher Kittredge"
To: "NANOG list"
Sent: Mon
12 matches
Mail list logo
