RE: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-08 Thread John van Oppen
LLC Direct: 206.973.8302 Main: 206.973.8300 Website: http://spectrumnetworks.us -Original Message- From: Skywing [mailto:skyw...@valhallalegends.com] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 10:31 PM To: Suresh Ramasubramanian; Raleigh Apple Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: UCEProtect Level 3 I

RE: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread Aaron Wendel
Yes. Is that a problem? -Original Message- From: Raleigh Apple [mailto:rap...@rapidlink.com] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 1:34 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: UCEProtect Level 3 Is anyone else out there aware that the UCEProtect Level 3 email blacklist blocks entire AS? r

Re: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread Colin Alston
On 2009/05/07 08:34 PM Raleigh Apple wrote: Is anyone else out there aware that the UCEProtect Level 3 email blacklist blocks entire AS? Yes. We don't use them anymore.

Re: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 7 May 2009 13:43:14 -0500 Aaron Wendel aa...@wholesaleinternet.net wrote: Yes. Is that a problem? It is. I understand what they are trying to do but we were cut off from some places because someone else in the huge upstream we are with did something that appeared to be spam. It's too

Re: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread Jeffrey Meltzer
We stopped using UCEProtect in most places recently after using for I think a year or two -- Level 2 was blacklisting giant-sized netblocks (ie, most Cablevision cablemodem IP Space, twice, as well as large chunks of AboveNet space, and that's just what I noticed). - Original Message

Re: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread Matt Liotta
On May 7, 2009, at 4:10 PM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: It is. I understand what they are trying to do but we were cut off from some places because someone else in the huge upstream we are with did something that appeared to be spam. It's too broad of a brush. Indeed. That is the sort of

Re: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:21:26 -0400 Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote: (a) This discussion should probably be happening someplace other than NANOG (spam-l or mailop, perhaps?), and True. I didn't bring it up but this is my last post on the subject. (b) If you feel that UCEProtect L3 paints with

RE: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread Tomas L. Byrnes
: Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Raleigh Apple wrote: Is anyone else out there aware that the UCEProtect Level 3 email blacklist blocks entire AS? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=uceprotect+level+3

Re: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Raleigh Apple rap...@rapidlink.com wrote: Is anyone else out there aware that the UCEProtect Level 3 email blacklist blocks entire AS? Is there anyone out there aware of any significant (or larger than 'man and his dog on a DSL') mail provider using UCEPROTECT?

RE: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread Skywing
...@rapidlink.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: UCEProtect Level 3 On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Raleigh Apple rap...@rapidlink.com wrote: Is anyone else out there aware that the UCEProtect Level 3 email blacklist blocks entire AS? Is there anyone out there aware of any significant

Re: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Skywing skyw...@valhallalegends.com wrote: I seem to recall that Mailstreet/MXlogic firewalls off (not rejects at SMTP level) any AS listed in UCEProtect, at least of about a year or so ago. - S I would be very surprised indeed if MX Logic did something like