Yes the Verisign auth stuff is done by Symantic as of 2010.
-Grant
On Thursday, December 27, 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Blake Pfankuch
> >
> wrote:
> > Our stuff is currently through Verisign because of the "reliability of
> the name" and the nature of th
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Our stuff is currently through Verisign because of the "reliability of the
> name" and the nature of the industry.
verisign sold this business (like 2+ years ago?), maybe it's time to
find someone else with a reliable name? (who hasn't sol
On 12/27/12, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
It does make no sense, and I would say it is an unusual restriction,
but a CA can put any certificate usage restriction they want in their
policy, and technically, they have likely included a right to audit
and issue out a revokation/CRL for any certificates
I've found rapidssl wildcards are generally the cheapest (~$120), and
are not limited to a number of servers. In practice, neither are the
other brands.
Ken
On 12/27/2012 1:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to validate something
> a vendor is t
Thanks everyone for the quick responses. Our stuff is currently through
Verisign because of the "reliability of the name" and the nature of the
industry. Any suggestions for who I should look at to replace them with? I
know I will be saving money, but looking to keep the name reliability as w
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Vendor is telling me that the Wildcard certificates are licensed
> per physical device it is installed on.
If you stay at a $200 hotel, you pay an extra $10 for Internet access.
If you stay at a $40 motel, Internet is included. Same differe
I did and it was vendor dependent which is why I switched a year and a half ago.
TTFN,
Larry
http://www.linkedin.com/in/llabas
On Dec 27, 2012, at 11:47, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to validate something
>
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to validate something
> a vendor is telling me and hoping some people here have expertise in this
> area...
>
> I am working with a SSL certificate provider. I am trying to purchase
Many vendors do this and I highly recommend someone like Digicert that won't
play the per-machine licensing game with you.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 27, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to validate something
> a vendor is tell
Yes, some SSL providers (mostly the overpriced ones) like to "license"
their certs on a per-server basis. If you read the contract language,
this is how it's written. However, this is strictly a contractual
issue, not a technical one. It's just a way to squeeze more money out
of people who
10 matches
Mail list logo
