Re: Satellite IP

2011-01-11 Thread mikea
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 04:33:30PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Valdis Kletnieks" > > > > Why the hostility, Valdis? > > > > As I said several times - it's not hard to be 98% or 99% sure you can make > > all your commitments. However, since predicting the

Re: Satellite IP

2011-01-10 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:33:30 EST, Jay Ashworth said: > > From: "Valdis Kletnieks" > > Remember, we're coming out of a solar minimum. ;) > > Are we in fact coming out of it yet? I heard it was getting deeper, > and that we were looking at a Dalton, if not another Maunder. Hmm.. guess Sunspots 1

Re: Satellite IP

2011-01-10 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Valdis Kletnieks" > > Why the hostility, Valdis? > > As I said several times - it's not hard to be 98% or 99% sure you can make > all your commitments. However, since predicting the future is an inexact > science, > it's really hard to provide a *100% guaran

Re: Satellite IP

2011-01-10 Thread Jay Ashworth
every > single customer who wants to book 4 hours on Thursday on short notice. > > Like I said - 98% is easy. 100% is hard. Sure. But 100% is also your strawman, I believe; no? Particularly in the specific space we're presently talking about: iDirect Satellite IP service over tr

Re: Satellite IP

2011-01-10 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday, January 10, 2011 01:28:07 pm Jay Ashworth wrote: > My motivation for asking the question *here* was of course to get the operator > perspective on the actual transport, if anyone had any. I helped a radio station put together a remote trailer using a mobile satellite system back in 2

Re: Satellite IP

2011-01-10 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Valdis Kletnieks" > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:06:32 EST, Kelly Olsen said: > > That would only happen with an outrageously over-subscribed > > provider. > > OK - I'll feed the troll. What's the proper amount of unused and therefor > non-revenue-generating capac

Re: Satellite IP

2011-01-10 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:06:32 EST, Kelly Olsen said: > That would only happen with an outrageously over-subscribed provider. OK - I'll feed the troll. What's the proper amount of unused and therefor non-revenue-generating capacity the operator is supposed to reserve in order to *guarantee* that ba

Re: Satellite IP

2011-01-10 Thread Ryan Wilkins
On Jan 10, 2011, at 9:08 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > I'm looking into satellite-based 2-way IP transport, on the scale of > SCPC DVB-RCS or iDirect, as an adjunct to the already installed > "traditional" one-way satellite gear installed in the Frontline DSNG > truck owned by my new employer, both

Re: Satellite IP

2011-01-10 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:08:57 EST, Jay Ashworth said: > Almost all of what I'll need to do will be what the satellite guys call > "occasional use", ie: "I need a six hour block Thursday night, starting > at 7pm", as opposed to the "monthly service with an FAP" that most > people seem to sell. Wha

Satellite IP

2011-01-10 Thread Jay Ashworth
This is admittedly a touch end-usery, my apologies... I'm looking into satellite-based 2-way IP transport, on the scale of SCPC DVB-RCS or iDirect, as an adjunct to the already installed "traditional" one-way satellite gear installed in the Frontline DSNG truck owned by my new employer, both for