Re: Spamhaus BGP feed experiences?

At dnswl.org we check our data against the DROP list every once in a while. The overlap of DROP with legitimate sources of SMTP traffic is very, very small: a low single-digit number, and most of them are crappy to start with (so we don’t publish them, but only keep them in o

Re: Spamhaus BGP feed experiences?

In article <555b8313.5080...@netassist.ua> you write: >How much false positives (i.e. blackholing traffic users want to reach)? Very little. The DROP list, which is what's in the BGP feed, is a small subset of the SBL, and only includes blocks that send no legitimate traffic at all. > >On 18.05

Re: Spamhaus BGP feed experiences?

How much false positives (i.e. blackholing traffic users want to reach)? On 18.05.15 21:04, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 17, Mike Lyon wrote: > >> Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to >> prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your experience been? Is >>

Re: Spamhaus BGP feed experiences?

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Mike Lyon wrote: > Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to > prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your experience been? Is > it worthwhile? Has it helped? On / off list responses are appreciated in > advance. We've been us

Re: Spamhaus BGP feed experiences?

On May 17, Mike Lyon wrote: > Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to > prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your experience been? Is > it worthwhile? Has it helped? On / off list responses are appreciated in > advance. We use Spamhaus DROP (not the BGP v

Spamhaus BGP feed experiences?

Howdy! Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your experience been? Is it worthwhile? Has it helped? On / off list responses are appreciated in advance. Thank You, Mike -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com