At dnswl.org http://dnswl.org/ we check our data against the DROP list every
once in a while. The overlap of DROP with legitimate sources of SMTP traffic is
very, very small: a low single-digit number, and most of them are crappy to
start with (so we don’t publish them, but only keep them in
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to
prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your experience been? Is
it worthwhile? Has it helped? On / off list responses are appreciated in
How much false positives (i.e. blackholing traffic users want to reach)?
On 18.05.15 21:04, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 17, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to
prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your
In article 555b8313.5080...@netassist.ua you write:
How much false positives (i.e. blackholing traffic users want to reach)?
Very little. The DROP list, which is what's in the BGP feed, is a
small subset of the SBL, and only includes blocks that send no
legitimate traffic at all.
On 18.05.15
On May 17, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to
prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your experience been? Is
it worthwhile? Has it helped? On / off list responses are appreciated in
advance.
We use Spamhaus
Howdy!
Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to
prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your experience been? Is
it worthwhile? Has it helped? On / off list responses are appreciated in
advance.
Thank You,
Mike
--
Mike Lyon
408-621-4826
6 matches
Mail list logo
