As many of you know, both Trend Micro and Spamhaus have published warnings
about a Wikileaks mirror site 'wikileaks.info' which is run by the person or
persons behind 'AnonOps' from an IP address of a Russian dedicated cybercrime
host (Heihachi) on which there is nothing but malware and other cy
On 12/18/2010 6:58 AM, Steve Linford wrote:
For trying to warn about the crime gangs located at the wikileaks.info mirror
IP, Spamhaus is now under ddos by AnonOps. The criminals there do not like our
free speech at all.
It appears that wikileaks.org is operational again and redirecting to
On Dec 18, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 12/18/2010 6:58 AM, Steve Linford wrote:
>> For trying to warn about the crime gangs located at the wikileaks.info
>> mirror IP, Spamhaus is now under ddos by AnonOps. The criminals there do not
>> like our free speech at all.
>>
>
> It appe
On 12/18/2010 5:15 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I get nothing from wikileaks.org, although the DNS is active :
$ host wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org has address 64.64.12.170
$ telnet 64.64.12.170 80
Trying 64.64.12.170...
Connected to 64.64.12.170.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: w
> On 12/18/2010 5:15 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> >
> > I get nothing from wikileaks.org, although the DNS is active :
> >
>
> $ host wikileaks.org
> wikileaks.org has address 64.64.12.170
Doesn't it seem vaguely suspicious that whois was just updated?
Domain ID:D130035267-LROR
Domain Name:WIKI
ikileaks.info's claims can be publicly
refuted?
Kind regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 3:00 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Spamhaus under DDOS from AnonOps (Wikileaks.info)
On 12/18/2010 6:58 AM,
todirekt.com." Any chance that will be done, so
> wikileaks.info's claims can be publicly
> refuted?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 3:00 PM
> To: nanog@n
On Dec 19, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
>> On 12/18/2010 5:15 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>>>
>>> I get nothing from wikileaks.org, although the DNS is active :
>>>
>>
>> $ host wikileaks.org
>> wikileaks.org has address 64.64.12.170
>
> Doesn't it seem vaguely suspicious that whois was
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:46:33PM -0600, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
> While I tend to trust Steve and Spamhaus because of their built up
> reputation, it would be helpful if some concrete facts were published about
> the "more than 40 criminal-run sites operating on the same IP address as
> wik
additional evidence
http://www.malwaredomainlist.com/mdl.php?search=41947&colsearch=All&quantity=50&inactive=on
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:46:33PM -0600, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
> > While I tend to trust Steve and Spamhaus because of
On 19/12/10 18:51, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> Not for nothing, but Spamhaus wasn't the only organization to warn about
> Heihachi:
>
> http://blog.trendmicro.com/wikileaks-in-a-dangerous-internet-neighborhood/
All the domains listed by Trend Micro as neighbours appear to be down.
Have to say as someo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Simon Waters wrote:
> On 19/12/10 18:51, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>> Not for nothing, but Spamhaus wasn't the only organization to warn about
>> Heihachi:
>>
>> http://blog.trendmicro.com/wikileaks-in-a-dangerous-interne
On 12/19/2010 08:33 PM, Ned Moran wrote:
> additional evidence
>
> http://www.malwaredomainlist.com/mdl.php?search=41947&colsearch=All&quantity=50&inactive=on
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:46:33PM -0600, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
>>>
announcement was not so clear.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ferguson [mailto:fergdawgs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 12:52 PM
To: frnk...@iname.com
Cc: Jack Bates; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Spamhaus under DDOS from AnonOps (Wikileaks.info)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
14 matches
Mail list logo