Re: IPv6 Test Pages for Fortune 500 and Top 100 web sites are back

Well that data is disappointing. From: NANOG on behalf of Owen DeLong via NANOG Date: Monday, February 12, 2024 at 5:03 PM To: NANOG list Subject: IPv6 Test Pages for Fortune 500 and Top 100 web sites are back Don’t know how much anyone will still care about these pages as there are lots of

IPv6 Test Pages for Fortune 500 and Top 100 web sites are back

Don’t know how much anyone will still care about these pages as there are lots of other sources of similar data these days. However, I finally got around to fixing the two pages I maintain: http://www.delong.com/ipv6_fortune500.html and http://www.delong.com/ipv6_alexa500.html In the case of Al

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

> Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 4:28:43 PM > Subject: Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC) > It’s been absurd for a while now… > > Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways... > >> On Oct 6, 2023, at 1:15 PM, Warren Kumari

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

It’s been absurd for a while now…Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...On Oct 6, 2023, at 1:15 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 2:58 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: The Disability Advocacy Community has been extensively involved with CMAS/WEA sinc

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 2:58 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: > The Disability Advocacy Community has been extensively involved with > CMAS/WEA since President Bush signed the WARN Act, passed by a republican > house and republican senate, in 2006. > > The dozens of disability groups helped design the sou

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

The Disability Advocacy Community has been extensively involved with CMAS/WEA since President Bush signed the WARN Act, passed by a republican house and republican senate, in 2006. The dozens of disability groups helped design the sound and vibration cadence (which is different than EAS), a

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

es of alerts can be suppressed in >software, but the fifth nine deliberately can't be suppressed. > >> Furthermore, it's simply unnecessary. It is incredibly easy to add a one-bit >> flag indicating whether or not it's a test to such alerts. > >There is

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

t be suppressed. Furthermore, it's simply unnecessary. It is incredibly easy to add a one-bit flag indicating whether or not it's a test to such alerts. There is a test flag. My phone shows an option to ignore tests. My phone does ignore weekly tests without any problem. It seems to be

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

adios use? Is this by chance a Specific Area Message Encoding (S.A.M.E.) filtering / lack of data issue? Can anyone corroborate NOAA weather radios not alerting? I was told this was intentional, as the intent was to test IPAWS and associated technologies vs. the NPT chain.   I work at a

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

- Original Message - > From: "Sean Donelan" > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, William Herrin wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:21 AM Sabri Berisha wrote: >>> Makes me wonder what I have to do to opt out of this. We all remember what >>> happened in Hawaii. >> >> For the national alert you can't. T

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, William Herrin wrote: On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:21 AM Sabri Berisha wrote: Makes me wonder what I have to do to opt out of this. We all remember what happened in Hawaii. For the national alert you can't. That's intentional. Although for some reason my silenced phone made

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

> > This > whole test was a display of poor engineering and disrespect for people's > first amendment rights. > You are certainly free to criticize the system or the implementation, but nothing about this is a First Amendment issue. Just don't. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

- On Oct 4, 2023, at 1:02 PM, Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net wrote: > Once upon a time, Grant Taylor said: >> I don't know if today's test is the same thing or not, but I >> remember in the last X years where there was a presidential test of >> the EAS and

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:21 AM Sabri Berisha wrote: > Makes me wonder what I have to do to opt out of this. We all remember what > happened in Hawaii. For the national alert you can't. That's intentional. Although for some reason my silenced phone made no noise. I got the alert, it popped up o

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Matthew Petach wrote: Ah, I didn't realize that was locally set on the device--I thought that was part of the message header in the message being sent out. Thanks for the clarification.  ^_^ Yep. That's why countries with a Prime Minister (or monarch or both) were complai

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 12:37 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Matthew Petach wrote: > > Well, today's alert still showed up as "Presidential Alert", so I guess > the > > US hasn't quite finished changing over yet. ^_^; > > (Samsung Galaxy phone) > > Yeah, Samsung is bad about releasi

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

rnado). I would expect the Presidential Alert class to be the same, if it exists. Can anyone corroborate NOAA weather radios not alerting? My weather radio went off for the regular weekly test a couple of hours before the national alert test, and did not go off for the national alert. -- Chris

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

Once upon a time, Grant Taylor said: > I don't know if today's test is the same thing or not, but I > remember in the last X years where there was a presidential test of > the EAS and there was supposedly no way to disable it short of > turning your device off. IIRC i

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

ntial Alert class to be the same, if it exists. > Can anyone corroborate NOAA weather radios not alerting? My weather radio went off for the regular weekly test a couple of hours before the national alert test, and did not go off for the national alert. -- Chris Adams

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023, at 15:09, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: > > I don't know if today's test is the same thing or not, but I remember in > the last X years where there was a presidential test of the EAS and > there was supposedly no way to disable it short of turning y

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

> On Oct 4, 2023, at 3:27 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 12:25 PM Sean Donelan > wrote: >> >> Emergency alerts are built into all android, ios and other mobile phones >> sold in almost every country during the last 5 years. GSM standards are >

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Matthew Petach wrote: Well, today's alert still showed up as "Presidential Alert", so I guess the US hasn't quite finished changing over yet.  ^_^; (Samsung Galaxy phone) Yeah, Samsung is bad about releasing software updates for its older (a few months old) products. Thin

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

I think this is what he was referring to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Hawaii_false_missile_alert Apparently we don't "all remember". On 10/4/2023 1:39 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Sabri Berisha wrote: Makes me wonder what I have to do to opt out of this. We all remember

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

Inter-agency bureaucracy. FEMA is part of Homeland Security. National Weather Service is part of the Commerce Department. Different departments of the government. Weather radios will active for a White House issued alert from the President. NOAA doesn't activate weather radios for FEMA t

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 12:25 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > > Emergency alerts are built into all android, ios and other mobile phones > sold in almost every country during the last 5 years. GSM standards are > global. The U.S. finally changed "presidential alert" to "national alert" > recently. We

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, nanog08 wrote: Move?  ...  :-) Off planet? All countries in the European Union, plus at least 35 other countries around the world, have or will soon implement their county-specific version of Emergency Mobile Alerts. Emergency alerts are built into all android, ios and

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On 10/4/23 1:45 PM, Aaron de Bruyn via NANOG wrote: I was kinda surprised that none of my NOAA weather radios went off. I sorta assumed they'd be tied into the whole "national" alert setup. That surprises me. Did the newer alert not get bridged into the same system that NOAA radios use? Is

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On 10/4/23 1:21 PM, Sabri Berisha wrote: So, this "worked". Despite me ensuring that my settings for Amber Alerts, Emergency Alerts, Public Safety Alerts, and Test Alerts are all off, my phone went nuts. I'm in a similar situation. Makes me wonder what I have to do to opt out

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

My watch and phone went off neither Streaming TV nor any of my computers displayed anything. On 10/4/23 13:38, Joe Klein wrote: Received it twice on the smartphone. Did not trigger the emergency weather system, nor impact stream on TV in NCR. Joe Klein "inveniet viam, aut faciet"^ --- Senec

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Ryan A. Krenzischek wrote: Yes, I already tried rebooting several times. Perhaps a large hammer will fix it! At least I know I'll be well notified in an emergency. Everytime you turn off a mobile device, it clears the cache of previous alerts. You will receive the

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

There are dozens of WEA alerts every day, 365x7 days a year. If you leave a hidden burner phone turned on the other 364 days a year, it will make a noise from something else. Software mute buttons never mute everything. Some groups use once a year events to get publicity for their causes (

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

Yes, I already tried rebooting several times. Perhaps a large hammer will fix it! At least I know I'll be well notified in an emergency. > On Oct 4, 2023, at 14:42, Sean Donelan wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Ryan A. Krenzischek wrote: >> I've only gotten the alert now ...9 times. > > Unless

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

Move?  ...  :-) On 10/4/23 12:21, Sabri Berisha wrote: - On Oct 1, 2023, at 3:24 PM, Sean Donelan s...@donelan.com wrote: Hi, This year's test of the U.S. national emergency alert includes something for ISPs and network operators. So, this "worked". Despite me ensuring t

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

T, Sean Donelan <mailto:s...@donelan.com> wrote: > > This year's test of the U.S. national emergency alert includes something > for ISPs and network operators. > > The wireless portion of the national test is scheduled 2 minutes (2:18pm > EDT or 1818 UTC) before the main bro

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

Some people have to for their safety or medical health (e.g. they're hiding a burner phone from an abusive relative, or their blood pressure goes up dangerously high when jumpscared). The kinds of people who remove batteries from smoke alarms are going to unfortunately use this affordance, if i

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Ryan A. Krenzischek wrote: I've only gotten the alert now ...9 times. Unless you keep turning your phone off, alerts have a serial number. Phones check the serial number for recently received alerts. Or so Android and iOS developers claim. If you are getting duplicate

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Sabri Berisha wrote: Makes me wonder what I have to do to opt out of this. We all remember what happened in Hawaii. Do you mean the 98 people (at least) who died due to the Maui Lahaina wildfires. Seems like the same people who complain about the testing of public warnin

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

Received it twice on the smartphone. Did not trigger the emergency weather system, nor impact stream on TV in NCR. Joe Klein "inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene 1) "*I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been." -- *Wayne Gretzky "I never

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

I've only gotten the alert now ...9 times. Ryan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

My watch went off. scared the beejeebus out of me -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Sabri Berisha Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2023 2:21 PM To: Sean Donelan Cc: nanog Subject: Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC) WARNING: This message

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

- On Oct 1, 2023, at 3:24 PM, Sean Donelan s...@donelan.com wrote: Hi, > This year's test of the U.S. national emergency alert includes something > for ISPs and network operators. So, this "worked". Despite me ensuring that my settings for Amber Alerts, Emergency

U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

This year's test of the U.S. national emergency alert includes something for ISPs and network operators. The wireless portion of the national test is scheduled 2 minutes (2:18pm EDT or 1818 UTC) before the main broadcast test at 2:20. Mobile phones usually receive the alert about a m

Re: Test Lab Best Practices

a while with a 60 day license. …also vSRX, vQFX, and the new vJunos-switch (I think vEX). Aaron > On Sep 28, 2023, at 3:16 PM, Mark Prosser wrote: > > ++ all that was said thus far. Physical equipment with console access is the > best way to test software/firmware is

Re: Test Lab Best Practices

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:14:24AM -0400, Kenneth Vedder wrote: Hello NANOG, We have been struggling with firmware bugs from a specific router vendor. I am looking to set up a test lab of our core network and a few remote site routers. Protocols would include SR-MPLS, ISIS, EVPN MPLS and L3VPN

Re: Test Lab Best Practices

++ all that was said thus far. Physical equipment with console access is the best way to test software/firmware issues. As for virtualization, it's great for expanding your topology quickly. Use a virtual bridge in GNS3 or EVE-NG and you can make your smaller footprint physical lab i

Re: Test Lab Best Practices

from a specific router vendor. I am looking to set up a test lab of our core network and a few remote site routers.  Protocols would include SR-MPLS, ISIS, EVPN MPLS and L3VPN with a little OSPF sprinkled in. I'd be grateful for any tips or resources anyone has that might cover testing strat

Re: Test Lab Best Practices

Appliance virtualization is perfectly acceptable for a lot of things. But there are large sets of problems that you will never catch that way. To the OP : With respect to 'strategies' : 1. Test something to make sure it works. 2. Then test it to see where and how it breaks. Lots of

Re: Test Lab Best Practices

: > > > >  > > Hello NANOG, > > > > We have been struggling with firmware bugs from a specific router > vendor. I am looking to set up a test lab of our core network and a few > remote site routers. Protocols would include SR-MPLS, ISIS, EVPN MPLS and > L3VPN

Re: Test Lab Best Practices

ote: > >  > Hello NANOG, > > We have been struggling with firmware bugs from a specific router vendor. I > am looking to set up a test lab of our core network and a few remote site > routers. Protocols would include SR-MPLS, ISIS, EVPN MPLS and L3VPN with a > little OSPF sp

Test Lab Best Practices

Hello NANOG, We have been struggling with firmware bugs from a specific router vendor. I am looking to set up a test lab of our core network and a few remote site routers. Protocols would include SR-MPLS, ISIS, EVPN MPLS and L3VPN with a little OSPF sprinkled in. I'd be grateful for any ti

starlink deluge test and 33 (-2) engine static fire

I know it is a bit off topic for nanog, but this test was very exciting today: https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1695158759717474379 Happy friday! While they have filed for a launch license for august 31st, it is impossible for me to believe that date! It was also difficult to believe the deluge

Re: Test Dual Queue L4S (if you are on Comcast)

seems to be boilerplate. > > > > From: "Livingood, Jason" > Date: Friday, June 16, 2023 at 15:46 > To: "Eric C. Miller" , nanog > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Test Dual Queue L4S (if you are on Comcast) > > > > We’re working to fix that. Sorry! >

RE: Test Dual Queue L4S (if you are on Comcast)

In the meantime please just select some unrelated industry on the form. We don’t care – it seems to be boilerplate. From: "Livingood, Jason" Date: Friday, June 16, 2023 at 15:46 To: "Eric C. Miller" , nanog Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Test Dual Queue L4S (if you are on Com

Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Test Dual Queue L4S (if you are on Comcast)

We’re working to fix that. Sorry! From: "Eric C. Miller" Date: Friday, June 16, 2023 at 15:18 To: Jason Livingood , nanog Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Test Dual Queue L4S (if you are on Comcast) FYI, when trying to sign up, it tells me that my input isn’t required because I work in

RE: Test Dual Queue L4S (if you are on Comcast)

FYI, when trying to sign up, it tells me that my input isn’t required because I work in the telco industry. Eric From: NANOG On Behalf Of Livingood, Jason via NANOG Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 2:30 PM To: nanog Subject: Test Dual Queue L4S (if you are on Comcast) FYI that today we (Comcast

Test Dual Queue L4S (if you are on Comcast)

FYI that today we (Comcast) have announced the start of low latency networking (L4S) field trials. If you are a customer and would like to volunteer, please visit this page. For more info, there is a b

Mail Sending Self-Test Platform

well, especially given that it includes a full IPv6 readiness test for mail infra (recursive DNS, authoritative DNS, and v6 mail delivery ;-)). I'd be happy to hear your feedback, especially if things do not work as expected (then, your test ID and ideally stored emails would be really helpful

Re: Google Speed Test

ch are still the only few that sample tcp_info enough to get cwnd and rtt statistics directly from the streams. waveform's speedtest leverages cloudflare's cdn. The new speedtest.net apps test for the presence of "FQ" more than bufferbloat, but also come in command line versions.

Re: Google Speed Test

Cloudflare has https://speed.cloudflare.com and Apple has http://test.edge.apple/debug/ too. The Cloudflare speed test usually gives lesser results vs. Ookla while Apple's test URL is only useful to test on which cluster an end-customer ends up. I'll take notes about the "networkQ

Re: Google Speed Test

> On Jan 3, 2023, at 08:24, Mike Hammett wrote: > > I think this is why Netflix came out with fast.com , but > AFAIK, they're the only ones that have their own tool using their own > infrastructure. macOS have a built-in “networkQuality” command line tool (`man networkQuali

Re: Google Speed Test

I think this is why Netflix came out with fast.com, but AFAIK, they're the only ones that have their own tool using their own infrastructure. Speedtest.net came out with a test that simulates video streaming and gives a bit more information than a feeling, but it can only go so far,

Re: Google Speed Test

st-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > -- > *From: *"Jared Mau

Re: Google Speed Test

while your service could deliver Y megabit. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Jared Mauch" To: "Mike Hammett" Cc: "Tom Beecher" , "NANOG" Sent: Tuesday, Jan

Re: Google Speed Test

Ok. But to the layperson, that is still not a meaningful test of Google's capacity. Say I'm a 'layperson' residential customer of an ISP with 1G service. I run this speedtest, and I only get 500M to Google. 1. That may still be plenty of capacity for what the user WANTS

Re: Google Speed Test

> > > There's not a problem to be solved, but information of a variety of types to > be gleaned for a variety of purposes. Most SLAs only cover on-net services, I recommend having a good on-net server for testing purposes and knowing your immediate upstream and p

Re: Google Speed Test

to be gleaned for a variety of purposes. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Tom Beecher" To: "Mike Hammett" Cc: "NANOG" Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 9:07:57

Re: Google Speed Test

> > Are you saying that congestion doesn't exist? > Not sure how you took that from what I said. No, I am not. I am saying your request for a 'layperson' to run a speed test doesn't seem particularly useful to identify that anyways. It's not a first order

Re: Google Speed Test

ary 3, 2023 8:50:35 AM Subject: Re: Google Speed Test Does AS15169 have a speed test? It would be nice to gauge the capacity to a particular network that's something laypeople could do. 15169 has enough capacity to external networks that a speed test from a random 'laypers

Re: Google Speed Test

> > Does AS15169 have a speed test? It would be nice to gauge the capacity to > a particular network that's something laypeople could do. > 15169 has enough capacity to external networks that a speed test from a random 'layperson' is never going to give you any mean

Re: Google Speed Test

No only that - NDT is not even an actual speed test*. That it continues to show as the top sponsored result for "speed test" searches is a real shame. Jason * It does not test the aggregate throughput of a connection, merely what one TCP connection can achieve. It is actually a diagn

Re: Google Speed Test

s cloud flare's CDN. >>> >>> I have a worldwide fleet of iperf, netperf, flent and irtt servers folk >>> are welcome to use, as I don't trust the web best tests >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022, 11:44 AM Douglas Fischer >>> wrote: >

Re: Google Speed Test

n of something like embeded quality testing on youtube. >>> I don't remember if it was a speed test or a latency/jitter test. >>> >>> I looked quickly to see if I could find it... But I couldn't find it. >>> >>> Em qua., 28 de dez. de 2022 às

Re: Google Speed Test

t tests > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022, 11:44 AM Douglas Fischer > wrote: > >> I have recollection of something like embeded quality testing on youtube. >> I don't remember if it was a speed test or a latency/jitter test. >> >> I looked quickly to see if I co

Re: Google Speed Test

ty testing on youtube. > I don't remember if it was a speed test or a latency/jitter test. > > I looked quickly to see if I could find it... But I couldn't find it. > > Em qua., 28 de dez. de 2022 às 13:43, Mike Hammett > escreveu: > >> Does AS15169 have a speed te

Re: Google Speed Test

; , "North American Network Operators' Group" Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2022 12:02:52 PM Subject: Re: Google Speed Test None of them are accurate. The one from a Google search gave me around 280Mbps, the stadia gave me 39Mbps, and Ookla gave me close to 500Mbps.. On We

Re: Google Speed Test

Searching Google for speed test presents a speedtest that runs on MLab, which doesn't necessarily run on Google's network. https://www.measurementlab.net/status/ - Mike Hammett [ http://www.ics-il.com/ | Intelligent Computing Solutions ] [ https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL

Re: Google Speed Test

They axed all that years ago, it was here: https://www.google.com/get/videoqualityreport On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 2:43 PM Douglas Fischer wrote: > I have recollection of something like embeded quality testing on youtube. > I don't remember if it was a speed test or a latency/jitter

Re: Google Speed Test

I have recollection of something like embeded quality testing on youtube. I don't remember if it was a speed test or a latency/jitter test. I looked quickly to see if I could find it... But I couldn't find it. Em qua., 28 de dez. de 2022 às 13:43, Mike Hammett escreveu: > Does A

Re: Google Speed Test

Those are all M-Lab tests - Stadia and google search results. They're not always certainly through Google's network (I would have to imagine they're typically not). On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 1:17 PM Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Robert Webb said: > > None of them are accurate. The one f

Re: Google Speed Test

Once upon a time, Robert Webb said: > None of them are accurate. The one from a Google search gave me around > 280Mbps, the stadia gave me 39Mbps, and Ookla gave me close to 500Mbps.. Browser-based speed testing is a crapshoot for anything above about 100M... Ookla has a native client for just ab

Re: Google Speed Test

AS15169 have a speed test? > > Stadia speedtest is still up today: > > https://stadia.google.com/speedtest > > > Lukas >

Re: Google Speed Test

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 12:50 PM Lukas Tribus wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 17:41, Mike Hammett wrote: > > > > Does AS15169 have a speed test? > > Stadia speedtest is still up today: > > https://stadia.google.com/speedtest "Google partners

Re: Google Speed Test

Hello, On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 17:41, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Does AS15169 have a speed test? Stadia speedtest is still up today: https://stadia.google.com/speedtest Lukas

Re: Google Speed Test

Search "speed test" and Google search had one built in On Wed, 28 Dec 2022, 16:43 Mike Hammett, wrote: > Does AS15169 have a speed test? It would be nice to gauge the capacity to > a particular network that's something laypeople could do. I could host > something in

Google Speed Test

Does AS15169 have a speed test? It would be nice to gauge the capacity to a particular network that's something laypeople could do. I could host something in GCP myself, but cloud is expensive. - Mike Hammett [ http://www.ics-il.com/ | Intelligent Computing Solutions ] [

Test Bed for New Protocol Re: Proposals at ITU-T for Internet Evolution Raise Serious Concerns; According to ISOC Re: 202208121501.AYC

ally, I offered our EzIP RAN (Regional Area Network) configuration as the "New IP" test bed. So that they could have a real life demonstration setup going within the existing Internet environment, yet independent of the current operations. It could avoid spending a lot of efforts o

Re: 4 gbit capable bufferbloat flent test target close to/traversing MegaIX in sydney?

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 2:48 PM Dave Taht wrote: > > I am curious if there is anyone out there willing to run a server with > irtt and netperf on it that I could do some bufferbloat testing > against (in off peak hours)? I've been getting some severely bloated > (250ms!) results on the 27ms path I

4 gbit capable bufferbloat flent test target close to/traversing MegaIX in sydney?

I am curious if there is anyone out there willing to run a server with irtt and netperf on it that I could do some bufferbloat testing against (in off peak hours)? I've been getting some severely bloated (250ms!) results on the 27ms path I'm on now at rates slightly above 1.2gbit (can share the

Re: Test email

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 6/20/22 4:34 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > I assume the admins are testing out > what has been blocking my emails for the past month and somehow this > email slipped thru. Just ignore and delete. This was not sent by the list admin team. The ema

Re: Test email

Sir - that so sounds like the move of a Cogent rep ha ha *Glenn S. Kelley* On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:48 AM J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote: > > This is like setting a read-receipt-to: to a mailing list. The results > are phenom ! > > But on the other hand you get a nice handy list of replies

Re: Test email

This is like setting a read-receipt-to: to a mailing list. The results are phenom ! But on the other hand you get a nice handy list of replies that say "did not read" ;) leaking their address as a member. Done this by accident myself :( On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 02:11:50AM -0600, h...@interall.co

Re: Test email

Novices 🤪 -- J. Hellenthal The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. > On Jun 20, 2022, at 03:36, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > On 20/06/2022 11:30, Peter Potvin wrote: > > I did not send this to the list. I assume the

Re: Test email

On 20/06/2022 11:30, Peter Potvin wrote: I did not send this to the list. I assume the admins are testing out what has been blocking my emails for the past month and somehow this email slipped thru. Just ignore and delete. -Hank Why did moderation let this through the filters? I don't beli

Re: Test email

Why did moderation let this through the filters? I don't believe that testing email functionality is the intended use case of the NANOG mailing list. Also worth noting that the website for the domain this came from says the owner of the site specializes in "anti-spam", which based on this email al

Test email

Hello, Checking Email Functionality. Hosting Support Thank you,

Re: Opt-in national WEA test in the United States on Aug 11 at 2:20pm EDT

A reminder, by default consumer cell phones do NOT have WEA tests enabled. Your phone would NOT display today's WEA test, unless you manually opt-in. Alerts are enabled by default -- Tests are disabled by default. On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Sean Donelan wrote: Tommorrow, Wednesday, August 11,

Opt-in national WEA test in the United States on Aug 11 at 2:20pm EDT

Tommorrow, Wednesday, August 11, 2021 at 2:20 p.m. EDT the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will be testing the national emergency alert system and wireless emergency alert system. Most of the news reporting has tried to simplify things. The Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) test on

FCC Report on 2019 Nationwide Emergency Alert Test

FCC published its 2019 nationwide EAS test report. The issues haven't changed, and some improved. "With respect to the single largest complication reported from the 2019 nationwide EAS test results – namely, issues with monitoring source failures – FEMA notes that it is activ

Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test

Vincent Bernat писал 2020-04-22 15:26: ❦ 22 avril 2020 12:51 -04, Andrey Kostin: BTW, has anybody yet thought/looked into extending RPKI-RTR protocol for validation of prefixes received from peer-as to make ingress filtering more dynamic and move away prefix filters from the routers? It could

Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test

Christopher Morrow писал 2020-04-22 14:05: a question about the data types here... So, a neighbor with no downstream ASN could be filtered directly with ROA == prefixlist-content. A neighbor with a downstream ASN has to be ROA (per asn downstream) == prefixlist-content. So you'd now have to do

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >