To close the loop on this, Verizon Wireless reported to me that they
fixed the issue (whatever it was).
They further said that 63.56.37.4 was a typo; all IPs should have been
in 63.59.x.x.
I am able to reach the 63.59.0.0/16 IPs in question: 63.59.39.232 &
63.59.67.68.
Justin: Thanks for t
Based on the ASName of both AS, including CELLCO which is the actual name of
the corporate entity known as Verizon Wireless, I would agree that both are in
fact Verizon Wireless. The contacts are just corporate standard entities.
Shane
> On Feb 19, 2024, at 9:01 PM, Richard Laager wrote:
>
>
I see the route originated by two different ASNs. I agree that when I
use the AS6167 path, it is broken (for the destinations where it is
broken; 63.59.166.100 was working despite using the AS6167 path).
BGP routing table entry for 63.59.0.0/16
Paths: 2 available
6939 701 22394
184.105.3
at that one.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Laager <rlaa...@wiktel.com>
To: Justin Krejci <jkre...@usinternet.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Verizon Business Contact
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:41:04 -0600
On 2024-02-09 18:10, Justin Krejci
ronan-online.com
To: "Justin Krejci"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 1:54:43 PM
Subject: Re: Verizon Business Contact
Verizon Business is the fixed line business focused entity, formerly MCI and
UUNET. Verizon Wireless is the wireless business entity.
Shan
rect geography." I laughed and
I cried at that one.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Laager <rlaa...@wiktel.com>
To: Justin Krejci <jkre...@usinternet.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Verizon Business Contact
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:41
Krejci
mailto:justin%20krejci%20%3cjkre...@usinternet.com%3e>>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
mailto:%22na...@nanog.org%22%20%3cna...@nanog.org%3e>>
Subject: Re: Verizon Business Contact
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:41:04 -0600
On 2024-02-09 18:10, Justin Krejci wrote:
For a good long while (mo
On 2024-02-09 18:10, Justin Krejci wrote:
For a good long while (months) we have had similar issues with various
Verizon destinations.
Only Verizon *Wireless* destinations, or other Verizon *Business* things?
As of today, I'm told (via an upstream provider) that Verizon Business
says this is
;
To: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Verizon Business Contact
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 13:01:14 -0600
Can someone from Verizon Business please contact me?
It appears that your network is losing traffic from Verizon Wireless
(e.g. 63.59.39.232, 63.56.37.4, or 63.59.67.68) to me (AS
Can someone from Verizon Business please contact me?
It appears that your network is losing traffic from Verizon Wireless
(e.g. 63.59.39.232, 63.56.37.4, or 63.59.67.68) to me (AS33362, e.g. to
69.89.207.16). Note that 63.59.166.100 -> 69.89.207.16 was successfully
(around 2023-11-27).
This
10 matches
Mail list logo
