-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 11:19 -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> 1. They needed to stop doing so a few decades ago. Anybody still
> doing it today is doing it on purpose, which of course leads directly
> to the question: why?
One reason as to "why" is
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 11:19:36 -0400, Rich Kulawiec may have
written:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 05:53:48PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing
> > so.
>
> 1. They needed to stop doing so a few decades ago. Anybody still doing
> it
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 05:53:48PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing so.
1. They needed to stop doing so a few decades ago. Anybody still doing
it today is doing it on purpose, which of course leads directly to the
question: why?
2.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Rich Kulawiec
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 5:36 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> can we please just stop this nonsense?
An excellent
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> can we please just stop this nonsense?
An excellent way to stop this particular nonsense is to firewall out
every network allocation under the control of Psychz. This achieves
lossless compression of incoming data.
---rsk
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:13 PM Christopher Morrow <
morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> it's totally possible that the person who 'runs' the abuse@ is not the
> person that 'runs' the mail system at the places in question.
At my work you'll get an email issue addressed if you send it to
Maybe he’s hoping there’s an off chance that someone from psychz.net is
subscribed and listening. After all they run a network and this is an
operational mailing list.
at 10:54 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
Why are you telling us here on Nanog?
-mel
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:55 PM Dan Hollis wrote:
> I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing so.
>
>
it's totally possible that the person who 'runs' the abuse@ is not the
person that 'runs' the mail system at the places in question.
the larger the organization the
Why are you telling us here on Nanog?
-mel
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:43 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
> In article you write:
>> I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing so.
>
> See Canute, King.
>
> R's,
> John
In article you write:
>I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing so.
See Canute, King.
R's,
John
I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing so.
-Dan
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Mel Beckman wrote:
Dan,
Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your complaint
is.
-mel via cell
On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
On Tue, Jul
I bet you can search the nanog list archive and find this very discussion
topic surface about ever 8-12 months...
folk always fall in this trap (or a form of it):
"Welp, we've had 1 too many people in $CORP get infected via email, spam
filter all the things!!!"
... wait...
"Oh, yea duh..
Seemed pretty clear to me. He sent an abuse report to ab...@psychz.net and
it was rejected as spam.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 8:11 PM Mel Beckman wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your
> complaint is.
>
> -mel via cell
>
> > On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37
Dan,
Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your complaint
is.
-mel via cell
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
>> can we please just stop this nonsense?
>>
>> ip under your direct
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> can we please just stop this nonsense?
>
> ip under your direct control originates sewage. you should accept reports
> as-is.
>
> requiring victims of your sewage to go through special contortions to
> report it to you is not
can we please just stop this nonsense?
ip under your direct control originates sewage. you should accept reports as-is.
requiring victims of your sewage to go through special contortions to
report it to you is not acceptable.
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
16 matches
Mail list logo
